دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش: نویسندگان: Mordechai Kremnitzer, Talya Steiner, Andrej Lang سری: ISBN (شابک) : 9781108497589, 1108497586 ناشر: Cambridge University Press سال نشر: 2020 تعداد صفحات: 690 زبان: English فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود) حجم فایل: 5 مگابایت
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Proportionality in Action: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives on the Judicial Practice به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب تناسب در عمل: دیدگاه های تطبیقی و تجربی در رویه قضایی نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
تحلیل تطبیقی و تجربی تناسب در رویه قضایی شش دادگاه قانون اساسی و عالی کشور.
A comparative and empirical analysis of proportionality in the case law of six constitutional and supreme courts.
Cover Half-title Series information Title page Copyright information Contents List of Figures List of Tables List of Contributors Preface Table of Cases Introduction: Analysing Proportionality Comparatively and Empirically I Scholarship on Proportionality: Strands and Developments A The Predominance of Normative Approaches to Proportionality B The Appeal of Comparative Constitutional Inquiries into Proportionality C The Value of the Empirical Turn in Proportionality Scholarship II The Goals of This Book III Methodology and Research Design 1 Proportionality Analysis by the German Federal Constitutional Court I Introduction II Legal and Institutional Context A The Expansion of the Court's Powers B A Powerful Court and Its Limits C The Ways in Which Cases Are Brought before the FCC III Structure of Limitation Analysis A The Place of Proportionality in the Structure of Fundamental Rights B The Basic Contours of the Proportionality Test C Contexts of Proportionality Analysis D Division of Labour between the Different Proportionality Subtests E Deviations from the Standard Sequential Model of Proportionality IV Limitation of a Fundamental Right A Scope of a Fundamental Right B What Triggers the Infringement of a Fundamental Right? C Limitation of Fundamental Rights 1 Limitation Clauses 2 Limits of Rights Limitations except Proportionality V Worthy Purpose A Establishing What the Purpose Is 1 Reliance on Statutory Text and Legislative History 2 Purposes Supplied by the Court 3 Multiple Purposes B What Are Worthy Purposes? 1 Determining the Worthiness of a Purpose 2 Importance and Urgency of the Worthy Purpose C What Are Unworthy Purposes? D Administrative Efficiency and Cost Savings as Worthy Purpose? VI Suitability A Establishing that the Measure Achieves the Purpose 1 Partial and Abstract Suitability 2 The Burden of Proof and the Limited Role of Evidentiary Issues 3 The Preference for Ex-ante Review 4 Measures Deemed Unsuitable B Effectiveness of Purpose Achievement C Substantiation over Time VII Necessity A Is There a Less Restricting Alternative? 1 Strict Exclusion of Less Restrictive but More Expensive Means 2 Comparative Law as Proof for the Existence of Less Restrictive Means B Comparative Effectiveness of Alternatives 1 Degree of Comparative Effectiveness Required 2 Conditions of Uncertainty and Deference to Policy-Makers C Can the Chosen Means Be More Narrowly Tailored? 1 What Characterizes Laws That Fail the Necessity Test? 2 A Narrow Conception of Necessity VIII Strict Proportionality A Interplay between the Strict Proportionality Test and the Other Tests 1 Interplay with the Worthy Purpose Stage 2 Interplay with the Suitability and Necessity Stages B Formulations and Applications of the Strict Proportionality Test 1 Formulas of Strict Proportionality 2 Modes of Strict Proportionality 3 Rules of Thumb C Interplay between Strict Proportionality and Remedy IX Overview of the Means Struck Down 2 Proportionality Analysis by the Canadian Supreme Court I Introduction II Legal and Institutional Context III Structure of Limitation Analysis A Overview B The Relationship between Section 1 Limitation Analysis and Internal Balancing Clauses C Contexts of Proportionality Analysis D Division of Labor between the Stages of the Analysis IV Limitation of a Constitutional Right A The Scope of a Constitutional Right B What Triggers the Limitation of a Constitutional Right? V Worthy Purpose A Establishing What the Purpose Is B What Are Worthy Purposes? C What Are Unworthy Purposes? D Administrative Efficiency and Cost Savings As Worthy Purpose? VI Suitability or Rational Connection A The Standard for Establishing Suitability B Effectiveness of Purpose Achievement VII Necessity or Minimal Impairment A Factors Influencing the Resolution of the Test B Is There a Less Restricting Alternative? C Comparative Effectiveness of Alternatives VIII Balancing A The Interplay between the Balancing Test and the Other Tests B A Larger Role for the Balancing Test? 3 Proportionality Analysis by the South African Constitutional Court I Introduction II Legal and Institutional Context A From Apartheid to the Human Rights Era B Access to Courts C Judicial Review of Administrative Action D Horizontal Application of the Bill of Rights E Criticisms of Judicial Activism in South Africa III Structure of Limitation Analysis A Overview B Challenges to Rights Limitation by Right Affected C Challenges to Rights Limitations by Subject Area of Limiting Measures D South Africa's 'Global' Proportionality Analysis E Division of Justificatory Labour in the Court's Proportionality Jurisprudence F Justification Requirements other than Proportionality G Conflict between Rights and Conflict with Public Interest IV Limitation of a Constitutional Right A The Scope of a Constitutional Right and the Seriousness of Rights Infringements B Hierarchy of Rights C What Triggers the Limitation of a Constitutional Right? V Worthy Purpose A Establishing the Purpose of the Limitation (i) The Legislature's Stated Purpose (ii) Evidence (iii) General v. Specific Statements of Purpose B Worthy and Unworthy Purposes C Administrative Efficiency and Cost-Saving as a Worthy Purpose VI Suitability or Rational Connection A The Significance of the Suitability Test B Suitability as Rational Connection C Determining Whether a Rational Connection Exists VII Necessity or Less Restricting Means A The Significance of the Less Restrictive Means Test B Narrow Tailoring of Means C Sufficiently Effective Alternatives VIII Balancing or Strict Proportionality A The Interplay between the Balancing Test and the Other Tests B Formulation and Application of the Strict Balancing Test C Additional Factors Taken into Account (i) Broader Harms (ii) Vulnerable Groups IX Overview of the Means Struck Down 4 Proportionality Analysis by the Israeli Supreme Court I Introduction II Legal and Institutional Context A The Pre-constitutional Era B The Rise in Judicial Activism and the Constitutional Revolution C The Backlash against the Court D The Ways Cases Are Brought before the Supreme Court III Structure of Limitation Analysis in Israel A Overview B Contexts of Proportionality Analysis C Division of Labour between the Stages of the Doctrine IV Limitation of a Constitutional Right A The Scope of Constitutional Rights B Government Actions as Limitations of Rights C The Severity of the Limitation V Worthy Purpose A Establishing What the Purpose Is 1 Official Declarations of Objective as Opposed to Unofficial Goals and Motivations 2 The Level of Abstraction Used in the Definition of the Goal 3 Multiple Goals B What Are Worthy Purposes? C What Are Unworthy Purposes? D Administrative Efficiency and Financial Saving as Worthy Purposes VI Suitability or Rational Connection A The Formulation of the Suitability Test B Establishing Rational Connection: Logic and Common Sense C Establishing Policy Effectiveness: The Use of Evidence 1 Establishing Effectiveness Ex Ante 2 Establishing Effectiveness Ex Post VII Necessity or Less-Restricting Means A Can the Chosen Means Be More Narrowly Tailored? 1 Narrowing the Scope of the Measure Exception Mechanisms The Categories of Application Individual Assessment 2 Narrowing the Frequency of the Limitation: Approval Procedures 3 Narrowing the Limitation in Time B Are There Alternative, Less-Restricting Measures? C Comparatively Assessing Alternatives 1 The Classic Formulation of the Necessity Test Standard: Equal Effectiveness 2 The Second Formulation of the Necessity Test Standard: Adequate Effectiveness 3 The Third Formulation of the Necessity Test Standard: Within the Range of Proportional Alternatives VIII Proportionality in the Strict Sense A The Interplay between the Final Stage and the Previous Stages B Formulations and Applications of Proportionality in the Strict Sense 1 Balancing in Absolute Terms 2 Balancing in Incremental Terms 3 Locating the Policy within the 'Proportionality Range' C Probability and Risk in the Balancing Formula D Additional Factors Taken into Account in the Balance IX Overview of the Means Struck Down 5 Proportionality Analysis by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal I Introduction II Legal and Institutional Context A The Rise and Fall of the Constitutional Tribunal B Powers of the Constitutional Tribunal Set Forth in the Constitution of 1997 C Bringing a Case before the Constitutional Tribunal III Structure of Limitation Analysis A The Limitation Clause B The Proportionality Test C The Contexts of Proportionality Analysis Categories of Rights The Outcome of Proportionality Analysis D Division of Labour between the Stages of the Proportionality Analysis IV Limitation of a Constitutional Right or Freedom A Constitutional Guarantees of Rights and Freedoms B The Hierarchy of Constitutional Rights and Freedoms Dignity, Liberty, and Equality as the General Principles of Law Economic and Social Rights C Application of the Infringement Test V Statutory Reservation Requirement A The Statutory Form of Rights Limitations B The Requirement of Statutory Specificity C The Requirement of Legislative Clarity, Precision, and Appropriateness VI Legitimate Aim A The Catalogue of Constitutional Values Justifying Restrictions of Constitutional Rights or Freedoms B Establishing the Relationship between a Legislative Purpose and a Legitimate Aim (a) Legislative Purpose (b) Goals Unworthy of Constitutional Protection (c) Mixed Legislative Motives (d) Administrative Efficiency and Procedural Economy VII Suitability A The Presumption of a Rational Legislator B Establishing Whether the Means Are Suitable C The Role of Evidence in the Suitability Stage VIII Necessity A The Formulation of the Necessity Test B Comparison to Alternative Measures C Means Found Unnecessary IX Proportionality in the Strict Sense A The Relationship between Strict Proportionality and the Previous Tests B The Application of the Strict Proportionality Test C The Prohibition of Excessiveness X Overview of the Means Struck Down 6 Limitation Analysis by the Indian Supreme Court I Introduction II Legal and Institutional Context A Institutional Structure B Normative Structure III Limitations Analyses in Theory A Article 14: Right to Equality B Article 19: Fundamental Freedoms C Article 21: Right to Life and Personal Liberty IV Limitations Analyses in Practice: Overview A Overview of Rights Adjudication B Contexts of Limitation Analysis C Division of Labour between the Elements of Limitation Analysis V Limitation of a Constitutional Right A Establishing the Limitation of a Right VI Worthy Purpose A The Role of Worthy Purpose in Limitation Analysis B Establishing a Worthy Purpose C What Are Worthy Purposes? D What Are Unworthy Purposes? E Proof of Purpose VII Suitability or Rational Nexus A The Role of Rational Nexus in Limitation Analysis B Establishing Rational Nexus C Narrow Tailoring D The (Non) Consideration of Alternative Means VIII General Balancing IX Relationship between Limitation Analysis and Remedies X Overview of the Means Struck Down 7 Comparative and Empirical Insights into Judicial Practice: Towards an Integrative Model of Proportionality I Introduction II The Structure of Proportionality Analysis in Theory and in Practice A Setting the Stage: Deviations from the Conventional Sequential Structure B A Single Dominant Element or Shared Responsibility between Tests? III The Significance of the Threshold Stages A The Threshold Stages in Theory B Judicial Practice Concerning the Worthy Purpose Test C Invigorating the Worthy Purpose Test D Judicial Practice Concerning the Suitability Test E Invigorating the Suitability Test F The Threshold Stages as the Gravitational Centre of Limitation Analysis: Judicial Practice in India IV Necessity and Strict Proportionality A The Relationship between the Two Elements in Theory B Judicial Practice 1 The German vs. the Canadian Model 2 An Integrated Model of Proportionality C Towards a More Commensurate Relationship between Necessity and Strict Proportionality V Proportionality as an Integrative Method of Analysis: Explanatory and Normative Perspectives A The Appeal of Integrative Proportionality Analysis from the Judicial Perspective B The Virtues of an Integrative Approach to Proportionality Analysis VI Future Possibilities for Empirically Grounded Comparative Research on Proportionality Index