دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش: 1st
نویسندگان: Ian Hacking
سری:
ISBN (شابک) : 9781107658158, 9781107723436
ناشر: Cambridge University Press
سال نشر: 2014
تعداد صفحات: 308
زبان: English
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود)
حجم فایل: 11 مگابایت
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Why Is There Philosophy of Mathematics At All به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب چرا اصلاً فلسفه ریاضیات وجود دارد نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
این کتاب واقعاً فلسفی ما را به مبانی بازمی گرداند - تجربه محض اثبات، و رابطه مرموز ریاضیات با طبیعت. این پرسشهای غیرمنتظره را مطرح میکند، مانند "چه چیزی ریاضیات را ریاضیات میسازد؟"، "اثبات از کجا آمده و چگونه تکامل یافته است؟"، و "تمایز بین ریاضیات محض و کاربردی چگونه به وجود آمده است؟" در یک بحث گسترده که هم در گذشته غوطه ور است و هم به طور غیرمعمول با ایده های فلسفی رقیب ریاضیدانان معاصر هماهنگ است، نشان می دهد که اثبات و سایر اشکال کاوش ریاضی همچنان رویه های زنده و در حال تکامل - پاسخگو به فن آوری های جدید، در عین حال تعبیه شده اند. در حقایق دائمی (و حیرت انگیز) در مورد انسان. چندین نوع متمایز از کاربرد ریاضیات را متمایز می کند و نشان می دهد که چگونه هر کدام به یک معمای فلسفی متفاوت منجر می شوند. در اینجا مجموعه قابل توجهی از تفکرات فلسفی جدید در مورد براهین، کاربردها و سایر فعالیت های ریاضی وجود دارد. به تجربه انجام ریاضیات می پردازد با ریاضیات به عنوان جنبه ای از طبیعت انسان برخورد می کند چگونگی به وجود آمدن تمایز بین ریاضیات محض و کاربردی را بررسی می کند
This truly philosophical book takes us back to fundamentals - the sheer experience of proof, and the enigmatic relation of mathematics to nature. It asks unexpected questions, such as 'what makes mathematics mathematics?', 'where did proof come from and how did it evolve?', and 'how did the distinction between pure and applied mathematics come into being?' In a wide-ranging discussion that is both immersed in the past and unusually attuned to the competing philosophical ideas of contemporary mathematicians, it shows that proof and other forms of mathematical exploration continue to be living, evolving practices - responsive to new technologies, yet embedded in permanent (and astonishing) facts about human beings. It distinguishes several distinct types of application of mathematics, and shows how each leads to a different philosophical conundrum. Here is a remarkable body of new philosophical thinking about proofs, applications, and other mathematical activities. Addresses the experience of doing mathematics Treats mathematics as an aspect of human nature Explores how the distinction between pure and applied mathematics came into being
Cover
About the Book
WHY IS THERE PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS AT ALL?
Copyright
© Ian Hacking, 2014
ISBN 978-1-107-05017-4 Hardback
ISBN 978-1-107-65815-8 Paperback
Dedication
Contents
Foreword
Chapter 1. A cartesian introduction
1 Proofs, applications, and other mathematical activities
2 On jargon
3 Descartes
A Application
4 Arithmetic applied to geometry
5 Descartes' Geometry
6 An astonishing identity
7 Unreasonable effectiveness
8 The application of geometry to arithmetic
9 The application of mathematics to mathematics
10 The same stuff?
11 Over-determined?
12 Unity behind diversity
13 On mentioning honours - the Fields Medals
14 Analogy - and Andre Weil 1940
15 The Langlands programme
16 Application, analogy, correspondence
B Proof
17 Two visions of proof
18 A convention
19 Eternal truths
20 Mere eternity as against necessity
21 Leibnizian proof
22 Voevodsky' s extreme
23 Cartesian proof
24 Descartes and Wittgenstein on proof
25 The experience of cartesian proof: caveat emptor
26 Grothendieck's cartesian vision: making it all obvious
27 Proofs and refutations
28 On squaring squares and not cubing cubes
29 From dissecting squares to electrical networks
30 Intuition
31 Descartes against foundations?
32 The two ideals of proof
33 Computer programmes: who checks whom?
Chapter 2. What makes mathematics mathematics?
1 We take it for granted
2 Arsenic
3 Some dictionaries
4 What the dictionaries suggest
5 A Japanese conversation
6 A sullen anti-mathematical protest
7 A miscellany
8 An institutional answer
9 A neuro-historical answer
10 The Peirces, father and son
11 A programmatic answer: logicism
12 A second programmatic answer: Bourbaki
13 Only Wittgenstein seems to have been troubled
14 Aside on method - on using Wittgenstein
15 A semantic answer
16 More miscellany
17 Proof
18 Experimental mathematics
19 Thurston's answer to the question 'what makes?'
20 On advance
21 Hilbert and the Millennium
22 Symmetry
23 The Butterfly Model
24 Could 'mathematics' be a 'fluke of history'?
25 The Latin Model
26 Inevitable or contingent?
27 Play
28 Mathematical games, ludic proof
Chapter 3. Why is there philosophy of mathematics?
1 A perennial topic
2 What is the philosophy of mathematics anyway?
3 Kant: in or out?
4 Ancient and Enlightenment
A An answer from the ancients: proof and exploration
5 The perennial philosophical obsession ...
6 The perennial philosophical obsession ... is totally anomalous
7 Food for thought (Matiere a penser)
8 The Monster
9 Exhaustive classification
10 Moonshine
11 The longest proof by hand
12 The experience of out-thereness
13 Parables
14 Glitter
15 The neurobiological retort
16 My own attitude
17 Naturalism
18 Plato!
B An answer from the Enlightenment: application
19 Kant shouts
20 The jargon
21 Necessity
22 Russell trashes necessity
23 Necessity no longer in the portfolio
24 Aside on Wittgenstein
25 Kant's question
26 Russell's version
2 7 Russell dissolves the mystery
28 Frege: number a second-order concept
29 Kant's conundrum becomes a twentieth-century dilemma: (a) Vienna
30 Kant's conundrum becomes a twentieth-century dilemma: (b) Quine
31 Ayer, Quine, and Kant
32 Logicizing philosophy of mathematics
33 A nifty one-sentence summary (Putnam redux)
34 John Stuart Mill on the need for a sound philosophy of mathematics
Chapter 4. Proofs
1 The contingency of the philosophy of mathematics
A Little contingencies
2 On inevitability and 'success'
3 Latin Model: infinity
4 Butterfly Model: complex numbers
5 Changing the setting
B Proof
6 The discovery of proof
7 Kant's tale
8 The other legend: Pythagoras
9 Unlocking the secrets of the universe
10 Plato, theoretical physicist
11 Harmonics works
12 Why there was uptake of demonstrative proof
13 Plato, kidnapper
14 Another suspect? Eleatic philosophy
15 Logic (and rhetoric)
16 Geometry and logic: esoteric and exoteric
17 Civilization without proof
18 Class bias
19 Did the ideal of proof impede the growth of knowledge?
20 What gold standard?
21 Proof demoted
22 A style of scientific reasoning
Chapter 5. Applications
1 Past and present
A THE EMERGENCE OF A DISTINCTION
2 Plato on the difference between philosophical and practical mathematics
3 Pure and mixed
4 Newton
5 Probability - swinging from branch to branch
6 Rein and angewandt
7 Pure Kant
8 Pure Gauss
9 The German nineteenth century, told in aphorisms
10 Applied polytechniciens
11 Military history
12 William Rowan Hamilton
13 Cambridge pure mathematics
14 Hardy, Russell, and Whitehead
15 Wittgenstein and von Mises
16 SIAM
B A VERY WOBBLY DISTINCTION
17 Kinds of application
18 Robust but not sharp
19 Philosophy and the Apps
20 Symmetry
21 The representational-deductive picture
22 Articulation
23 Moving from domain to domain
24 Rigidity
25 Maxwell and Buckminster Fuller
26 The maths of rigidity
2 7 Aerodynamics
28 Rivalry
29 The British institutional setting
30 The German institutional setting
31 Mechanics
32 Geometry, 'pure' and 'applied'
33 A general moral
34 Another style of scientific reasoning
Chapter 6. In Plato's name
1 llauntology
2 Platonism
3 Webster's
4 Born that way
5 Sources
6 Semantic ascent
7 Organization
A ALAIN CONNES, PLATONIST
8 Off-duty and off-the-cuff
9 Connes' archaic mathematical reality
10 Aside on incompleteness and platonism
11 Two attitudes, structuralist and Platonist
12 What numbers could not be
13 Pythagorean Connes
B TIMOTHY GOWERS, ANTI-PLATONIST
14 A very public mathematician
15 Does mathematics need a philosophy? No
16 On becoming an anti-Platonist
17 Does mathematics need a philosophy? Yes
18 Ontological commitment
19 Truth
20 Observable and abstract numbers
21 Gowers versus Connes
22 The 'standard' semantical account
23 The famous maxim
24 Chomsky's doubts
25 On referring
Chapter 7 Counter-platonisms
1 Two more platonisms - and their opponents
A TOTALIZING PLATONISM AS OPPOSEDTO INTUITIONISM
2 Paul Bernays (1888-1977)
3 The setting
4 Totalities
5 Other totalities
6 Arithmetical and geometrical totalities
7 Then and now: different philosophical concerns
8 Two more mathematicians, Kronecker and Dedekind
9 Some things Dedekind said
10 What was Kronecker protesting?
11 The structuralisms of mathematicians and philosophers distinguished
B TODAY'S PLATONISM/NOMINALISM
12 Disclaimer
13 A brief history of nominalism now
14 The nominalist programme
15 Whydeny?
16 Russellian roots
17 Ontological commitment
19 The indispensability argument
20 Presupposition
21 Contemporary platonism in mathematics
22 Intuition
23 What's the point of platonism?
24 Peirce: The only kind of thinking that has everadvanced human culture
25 Where do I stand on today's platonism/ nominalism?
26 The last word
Disclosures
References
Index