دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش: [1 ed.]
نویسندگان: Bellamy. Richard
سری: The International Library of Essays in Law and Legal Theory Second Series
ISBN (شابک) : 0754624633, 9780754624639
ناشر: Routledge
سال نشر: 2016
تعداد صفحات: 553
[596]
زبان: English
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود)
حجم فایل: 40 Mb
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب حاکمیت قانون و تفکیک قوا نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
این مجموعه از هجده مقاله کلیدی از حقوقدانان، نظریه پردازان سیاسی و دانشمندان علوم سیاسی حقوق عمومی، به بررسی نقش قانون در نظام سیاسی می پردازد. یازده مقاله اول ویژگی های استاندارد مرتبط با حاکمیت قانون را مشخص می کند. سپس هفت مقاله بعدی به بررسی این موضوع میپردازد که چگونه روشهای مختلف تفکیک و پراکندگی قدرت با وادار کردن سیاستمداران و قضات به طور یکسان به رفتار برابر با مردم و در نظر گرفتن هیچیک فراتر از قانون، به این سبک دموکراتیک حکومت کمک میکند.
This collection of eighteen key essays from jurists, political theorists and public law political scientists, explores the role law plays in the political system. The first eleven essays identify the standard features associated with the rule of law. The next seven essays then explore how different ways of separating and dispersing power contribute to this democratic style of rule by forcing politicians and judges alike to treat people as equals and regard none as above the law.
Cover Half Title Title Page Copyright Page Contents Acknowledgements Preface to the Second Series Introduction Defining the Rule of Law The Rule of Law and the Circumstances of Politics Arbitrary Rule and Rule by Law The Rule of Law and Judicial Discretion Judging on Principle The Separation and Balance of Power: A Republican View Democratizing the Judiciary Conclusion Notes PART I: DEFINING THE RULE OF LAW 1 ON THE MORAL STATUS OF THE RULE OF LAW I. REASONS RATHER THAN PROBABILITIES II. SIMMONDS AND THE RULE OF LAW A. Simmonds's First Major Retort: The First Strand B. Simmonds's First Major Retort: The Second Strand C. A Further Retort 2 RECONSIDERING THE RULE OF LAW I. INTRODUCTION II. THE RULE OF LAW AS A CONTESTED CONCEPT A. The Instrumental Conception of the Rule of Law, or "How to do Things with Rules" B. The Substantive Conception of the Rule of Law, or "How to Foster Liberty and Constrain Leviathan" C. A Contested Concept III. TRADITIONAL FORMALISM AND THE RULE OF LAW A. Senses of Traditional Formalism 1. Formal connection between rule and particulars 2. Formal connection between foundations and rules 3. Formal connection between words and things 4. Formal realizability and the formalist conception of rules B. Traditional Formalism and the Rule of Law IV. THE WITTGENSTEINIAN CONCEPTION OF RULES AND ITS CONSEQUENCES (IF ANY) A. The Wittgensteinian Social Conception of Rules B. Consequences (if any) for the Model of Rules and the Rule of Law l. Does Our Conception of Rules Matter? 2. Compromise Positions on the Model of Rules 3. On the connection between philosophy and normative social activity: the repercussions of reconceiving rules V. TOWARD REINTERPRETATION OF THE RULE OF LAW A. Liberal Legalism and Non-Formalist Natural Law B. The Rule of Law and Interpretive Community: Toward a Pragmatic View VI. CONCLUSION 3 THE RULE OF LAW AND ITS VIRTUE * 1. THE BASIC IDEA 2. SOME PRINCIPLES 3. THE VALUE OF THE RULE OF LAW 4. THE RULE OF LAW AND ITS ESSENCE 5. SOME PITFALLS 4 Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework 1. The formal conception of the rule of law (a) joseph Raz (b) Dicey (c) Unger 2. The substantive conception of the rule of law (a) Dworkin (b) Sir john Laws (c) Allan 3. A middle way? (a) Raz (b) Jowell 4. Conclusion 5 IS THE RULE OF LAW AN ESSENTIALLY CONTESTED CONCEPT (IN FLORIDA)? I. THE FLORIDA DEBACLE II. ANALYTIC CONFUSION III. A HISTORY OF CONTESTATION IV. RULE-OF-LAW ISSUES IN FLORIDA V. WHAT DOES "ESSENTIALLY CONTESTED" MEAN? VI. THE RULE OF LAW AS AN ESSENTIALLY CONTESTED CONCEPT VII. FINALLY, THE STREETS OF FLORIDA PART II: THE RULE OF LAW AND JUDICIAL DISCRETION 6 Freedom and the Rule of Law Preventing Arbitrary Coercion Unavoidable Duties Adapting British Traditions Ahroad Independent Judges and State Policy Dicey on Administrative Law A Political Argument 7 JUDICIAL DISCRETION 8 THE THIRD THEORY OF LAW 9 INCOMPLETELY THEORIZED AGREEMENTS INTRODUCTION I. AGREEMENTS WITHOUT THEORY A. In General B. How People Converge C. Rules and Analogies II. JUSTIFICATIONS AND INSTITUTIONS A. The Case for Incomplete Theorization B. Judges, Theory, and the Rule of Law C. Full Particularity? Ill. HERCULES AND THEORY A. An Ambitious Alternative B. Conceptual Ascent? C. Legitimacy IV. INCOMPLETELY THEORIZED AGREEMENTS OVER TIME A. Change B. Disagreement C. Principle, Politics, Law 10 Stability and Change in Judicial Decision-Making: INCREMENTALISM OR STARE DECISIS? Politicallurisprwlence Incrementalism Incrementalism and Judicial Decision-Making PART III: THE SEPARATION OF POWERS 11 The Political Form of the Constitution: the Separation of Powers, Rights and Representative Democracy The Separation of Powers and Rights: a Preliminary Analysis From Mixed Government to the Balanced Constitution The Separation of Powers and the Modern Republic Conclusion 12 Separation of Powers and Constitutional Government The values served by the separation of powers The doctrine under attack The doctrine defended The partial separation theory Implications of the separation of powers The separation of powers in the United Kingdom The separation of powers and constitutional reform 13 ON SPEAKING SOFTLY AND CARRYING BIG STICKS: NEGLECTED DIMENSIONS OF A REPUBLICATION SEPARATION OF POWERS I: The Concentration of Private Power A. TOWARDS THE 'PURE DOCTRINE' OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS B. BEYOND THE PURE DOCTRINE II: The Concept of the Separation of Powers A. ON METHOD B. FROM SPARTA TO MADISONIAN SEPARATIONS OF PRIVATE POWERS III: Why Big Sticks Rebound A.DETERRENCE FAILURE B. EMOTION AND DEFIANCE C. COGNITIONS OF STIGMA AND PROCEDURAL INJUSTICE D. REACTANCE E. RATIONAL COUNTER-DETERRENCE F. THE DETERRENCE TRAP IV: The Strength of Weak Sanctions A. OVERDETERMINATION AND SOFT TARGETS B. THE SOFT TARGET AT SOLOMONS C. THE ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL D. GENERALIZED RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND SOFT TARGETS V: Separating Enforcement Targeting from the Actor who Benefits from the Abuse A. TARGETING GATEKEEPERS C. THE PLETHORA OF THIRD PAR1YTARGETS D. BUILDING A THOUSAND GATES TO THE POWER OF CORRUPT OFFICIALS VI: Separating Powers Within and Between the Public and Private Sectors A. SUMMARY SO FAR B. PLURAL PRIVATE SEPARATIONS; PLURAL PUBLIC SEPARATIONS VII: How to Separate Powers in the Private Sector A. POWERS OF SHAREHOLDERS, DIRECTORS, MANAGERS B. AUDIT AND AUDIT OF AUDIT C. ENTERING THE CIRCLE WITH OUTSIDE POWER E. THE STRATEGIES VIII: Separation of Powers and Efficiency A. TWO CONCERNS B. OVERCOMPLIANCE C. FISCAL IRRESPONSIBILI1Y 14 A REVISIONIST VIEW OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS I. Introduction II. The Monopoly Analogue III. The Model (a) The Legislature (b) The Executive (c) The Game between Citizens, Parties and the Executive IV. Extensions and Generalizations V. The Separation of Powers VI. Concluding Remarks REFERENCES 15 Institutionalizing the Public Interest: The Defense of Deadlock and Beyond THE FEDERALIST DEFENSE OF DEADLOCK Making a Constitution and Defending It Defining the Public Interest Determining and Defending a Separation of Powers U.S. Constitutionalism Revisited ALTERNATIVE POLITICAL STRUCTURES Interest-Based Partitions Responsible Party Government Legislative Unanimity Direct Democracy ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTIONS OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST Reconceptualizations Implementation CONCLUSION REFERENCES PART IV: PARLIAMENTARISM AND FEDERALISM 16 THE NEW SEPARATION OF POWERS I. DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY A. Against Presidentialism B. Constrained Parliamentarianism C. The One-and-a-Half House Solution II. FUNCTIONAL SPECIALIZATION A. The Intellectual Challenge B. Two Modest Proposals C. Warring Separationisms D. From Theory to Practice E. Separationism and the Rule of Law III. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS A. The Democracy Branch B. Safeguarding Fundamental Rights IV. THE SHAPE OF THE NEW SEPARATIONISM 17 Constitutionalism and the Many Faces of Federalism I. THE DIVISION OF POWERS BETWEEN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND THE COMPONENT ENTITIES IN A MULTI-SOVEREIGN CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER A. Integrative Federalism A.1. The European Community (b) The division of powers in practice - ERASMUS as a case study (c) The absence of a constitutionally protected nucleus of sovereignty for the Member States (d) The relationship between Community and Member State powers (e) Executive federalism within the European Community A.2. Switzerland B. Devolutionary Federalism B.l. Belgium B.2. Canada B.3. Spain II. THE JUDICIAL UMPIRING OF INTEGRATIVE AND DEVOLUTIONARY FEDERALISM (a) The mechanisms of the judicial umpiring of the federal system (b) The relationship between the judiciary and the legislature as to the umpiring of the federal system Name Index