The Responsive Judge: International Perspectives

Intro
 Foreword
 Preface
 Contents
 Editors and Contributors
 What Is Responsive Judging?
 1 Introduction
 2 Responsiveness and the Jurisprudence of Judging
 2.1 Norms of Judging: Impartiality
 2.2 Norms of Judging: Independence and Transparency
 2.3 Civil and Common Law Traditions and Objectives
 3 Elements of Responsiveness
 3.1 Responding to Accountability
 3.2 Responding to a Networked Society
 3.3 Responding to Litigants
 3.4 Responding to Public Attention
 4 Critiques of Responsiveness
 4.1 The Exceptionalism/Personalism Critique
 4.2 The Judicial Function Critique 4.3 The Judicial Activism Critique4.4 The Impartiality Critique
 5 Studies of Responsiveness-Overview of the Chapters
 References
 Theoretical and Conceptual Contributions to Responsive Judging
 The Responsive Tribunal: Robust Processes
 Fair and Timely Outcomes
 1 Introduction
 2 Strategies for Responsiveness in Decision-Making Processes
 2.1 Using Discretion
 2.2 Weighing and Balancing
 2.3 Encouraging Responsiveness Between Participants
 2.4 Empowering Participants to Engage Meaningfully
 2.5 Designing the Process for the Circumstances
 2.6 Communicating Effectively 2.7 Exploring Interests2.8 Clarifying Facts and the Law
 3 Providing Opportunities to Resolve by Agreement
 3.1 Timing
 3.2 Compulsory or Optional Processes
 3.3 The Mediation Model and Broader Dispute Resolution Principles
 3.4 Process Design
 3.5 Choice of Dispute Resolver
 4 Conclusion
 References
 Settlement Adjudication and Judicial Responsiveness: The Choice Between a Wide and a Narrow Model
 1 Introduction
 2 The Range and Development of the Judicial Role
 2.1 The Range and Development of the Judicial Role in the United States 2.2 The Range and Development of the Judicial Role in Israel2.3 Concerns and Criticisms of Settlement Adjudication
 3 Settlement Adjudication According to the Narrow Model
 3.1 Characteristics of the Narrow Model
 3.2 Advantages and Disadvantages
 4 Settlement Adjudication According to the Wide Model
 4.1 Characteristics of the Wide Model
 4.2 Advantages and Disadvantages
 5 Proposals for Increasing the Use of the Wide Model
 6 Conclusion
 References
 Do Judges Need to Be Human? The Implications of Technology for Responsive Judging
 1 Introduction 2 Part 1-How AI Can Beneficially Contribute to the Work of Courts and Judges2.1 Technology and Dispute Resolution
 2.2 Technology Supporting Human Judges and Court Processes
 2.3 All Rise for Judge \"Co-bot\"?
 2.4 Judge Co-bot: Human Unconscious Bias and Quality Control?
 3 Part 2-Limits to Judge AI
 3.1 More Than Presiding in Court-the True Extent of the Role of the Modern Judge
 3.2 The Rule of Law, Judicial Authority, and the Human Judge
 3.3 Variation in the Adjudicative Function Within the Judicial Hierarchy
 3.4 The Challenge of Novelty
 3.5 Translating Law into Code