The Phenomenology of Questioning: Husserl, Heidegger and Patocka

Cover\nContents\nAbbreviations\nIntroduction\n	§1. The elusive phenomenon of the activity of questioning\n1 The phenomenon of questioning\n	§2. The role of questioning in phenomenology\n	§3. Husserl’s path from phenomenological questions to phenomenological answers\n	§4. Heidegger’s return to and preservation of Husserl’s phenomenological questioning\n	§5. Patočka’s undaunted phenomenology of the question ‘what is history?’\n	§6. The unique type of questioning employed by phenomenology\n2 Husserl’s ‘To the questions themselves’\n	§7. Chapter introduction\n	§8. Husserl’s motto precedes his methods\n	§9. The experiential, philosophical and historical flux of phenomenology\n	§10. What is the phenomenon for Husserl?\n	§11. Phenomena understood as pregnant objects and logical predicates\n	§12. The multiplicity of singular unities: A phenomenon and its manifold\n	§13. Phenomenology as systematic but not merely a system\n	§14. Chapter conclusion: Phenomenological questions precede their answers\n3 Heidegger’s ‘possibility’ of phenomenology\n	§15. Chapter introduction\n	§16. Heidegger moves away from Husserl\n	§17. Heidegger on the structures of an explicitly formulated question\n	§18. Heidegger’s BT as an introduction to phenomenology as possibility\n	§19. What does phenomenology mean for Heidegger?\n	§20. The four terms of phenomenon, semblance, appearance and mere appearance\n	§21. The concepts of logos and aletheia within the activity of phenomenology\n	§22. Chapter conclusion: The uncovered power of question preservation\n4 Patočka’s questioning phenomenology\n	§23. Chapter introduction\n	§24. The centrality of questioning in Husserl & Heidegger’s phenomenology\n	§25. Provisional, religious and philosophical definitions of heresy\n	§26. Patočka’s heretical approach to phenomenology\n	§27. Patočka’s encounter with Husserl’s questioning of the lifeworld\n	§28. What is phenomenology for Patočka?\n	§29. Patočka’s heretical phenomenology as using Heidegger to further Husserl\n	§30. Patočka’s philosophy of history as an example of his phenomenology\n	§31. Patočka’s phenomenology as shaken but undaunted philosophy\n	§32. Chapter conclusion: the method of Patočka’s heretical phenomenology\n5 The logos of questioning\n	§33. Chapter introduction\n	§34. Philosophy as a call to genuine questioning\n	§35. Regular questioning correlates with an experience of curiosity\n	§36. Philosophical questioning correlates with an experience of wonder (thaumasein)\n	§37. The stability and instability of questioning\n	§38. The flux of wonder and curiosity\n	§39. Chapter conclusion: Thinking in a mode of possibility\nConclusion\nNotes\nWorks Cited\nIndex