ورود به حساب

نام کاربری گذرواژه

گذرواژه را فراموش کردید؟ کلیک کنید

حساب کاربری ندارید؟ ساخت حساب

ساخت حساب کاربری

نام نام کاربری ایمیل شماره موبایل گذرواژه

برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید


09117307688
09117179751

در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید

دسترسی نامحدود

برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند

ضمانت بازگشت وجه

درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب

پشتیبانی

از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب

دانلود کتاب The Logical Structure of Philosophy, Psychology, Mind and Language in Wittgenstein and Searle

دانلود کتاب ساختار منطقی فلسفه، روانشناسی، ذهن و زبان در ویتگنشتاین و سرل

The Logical Structure of Philosophy, Psychology, Mind and Language in Wittgenstein and Searle

مشخصات کتاب

The Logical Structure of Philosophy, Psychology, Mind and Language in Wittgenstein and Searle

دسته بندی: فلسفه
ویرایش:  
نویسندگان:   
سری:  
ISBN (شابک) : 9781532321153 
ناشر: Michael Starks 
سال نشر: 2016 
تعداد صفحات: 367 
زبان: English 
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود) 
حجم فایل: 17 مگابایت 

قیمت کتاب (تومان) : 43,000



ثبت امتیاز به این کتاب

میانگین امتیاز به این کتاب :
       تعداد امتیاز دهندگان : 15


در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب The Logical Structure of Philosophy, Psychology, Mind and Language in Wittgenstein and Searle به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.

توجه داشته باشید کتاب ساختار منطقی فلسفه، روانشناسی، ذهن و زبان در ویتگنشتاین و سرل نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.


توضیحاتی درمورد کتاب به خارجی

In a History of Ideas´s perspective, this is an exceedingly Platonistic book. Any understanding of the being of entities as an enactment shines by its absence. It is said that, if he who is his own bar has a fool as a client, the author who is his own editor cultivates his communicational flaws. In the case of this book, foreseeably deadborn from the presses in December 2016, a heavy penchant for acronyms (W, H, DMS -occasionally changed by typo into DSM-, TPS) and unfriendly, underdeveloped references seem deliberately put in order to dissuade friendly readers. Nonetheless, this essay might harbor something of importance, maybe a way for Platonisms to overcome their well-known limitations, a behavior that the very Plato exhibits in the "parricide" he commits in Sophist. Yet this reviewer cannot ascertain it, because the author doesn´t care of pointing it out. Perhaps this short notice is intriguing enough for others to try, too. The author own words ("Preface") are the following: "This collection of articles was written over the last 10 years and the most important and longest within the last year. Also I have edited them to bring them up to date (2016). The copyright page has the date of this first edition and new editions will be noted there as I edit old articles or add new ones. All the articles are about human behavior (as are all articles by anyone about anything), and so about the limitations of having a recent monkey ancestry (8 million years or much less depending on viewpoint) and manifest words and deeds within the framework of our innate psychology as presented in the table of intentionality. As famous evolutionist Richard Leakey says, it is critical to keep in mind not that we evolved from apes, but that in every important way, we are apes. If everyone was given a real understanding of this (i.e., human ecology and psychology) in school, maybe civilization would have a chance. In my view these articles and reviews have many novel and highly useful elements, in that they use my own version of the recently (ca. 1980’s) developed dual systems view of our brain and behavior to lay out a logical system of rationality (personality, psychology, mind, language, behavior, thought, reasoning, reality etc.) that is sorely lacking in the behavioral sciences (psychology, philosophy, literature, politics, anthropology, history, economics, sociology etc.). The philosophy centers around the two writers I have found the most important, Ludwig Wittgenstein and John Searle, whose ideas I combine and extend within the dual system (two systems of thought) framework that has proven so useful in recent thinking and reasoning research. As I note, there is in my view essentially complete overlap between philosophy, in the strict sense of the enduring questions that concern the academic discipline, and the descriptive psychology of higher order thought (behavior). Once one has grasped Wittgenstein’s insight that there is only the issue of how the language game is to be played, one determines the Conditions of Satisfaction (what makes a statement true or satisfied etc.) and that is the end of the discussion. Now that I think I understand how the games work I have mostly lost interest in philosophy, which of course is how Wittgenstein said it should be. But since they are the result of our innate psychology, or as Wittgenstein put, it due to the lack of perspicuity of language, the problems run throughout all human discourse, so there is endless need for philosophical analysis, not only in the ‘human sciences’ of philosophy, sociology, anthropology, political science, psychology, history, literature, religion, etc., but in the ‘hard sciences’ of physics, mathematics, and biology. It is universal to mix the language game questions with the real scientific ones as to what the empirical facts are. Scientism is ever present and the master has laid it before us long ago, i.e., Wittgenstein (hereafter W) beginning principally with the Blue and Brown Books in the early 1930’s. Nevertheless, a real understanding of Wittgenstein’s work, and hence of how our psychology functions, is only beginning to spread in the second decade of the 21st century, due especially to P.M.S. Hacker (hereafter H) and Daniele Moyal-Sharrock (hereafter DMS), but also to many others, some of the more prominent of whom I mention in the articles. When I read ‘On Certainty’ a few years ago I characterized it in an Amazon review as the Foundation Stone of Philosophy and Psychology and the most basic document for understanding behavior, and about the same time DMS was writing articles noting that it had solved the millennia old epistemological problem of how we can know anything for certain. I realized that W was the first one to grasp what is now characterized as the two systems or dual systems of thought, and I generated a dual systems (S1 and S2) terminology which I found to be very powerful in describing behavior. I took the small table that John Searle (hereafter S) had been using, expanded it greatly, and found later that it integrated perfectly with the framework being used by various current workers in thinking and reasoning research. Since they were published individually, I have tried to make the book reviews and articles stand by themselves, insofar as possible, and this accounts for the repetition of various sections, notably the table and its explanation. I start with a short article that presents the table of intentionality and briefly describes its terminology and background. Next, is by far the longest article, which attempts a survey of the work of W and S as it relates to the table and so to an understanding or description (not explanation as W insisted) of behavior. The key to everything about us is biology, and it is obliviousness to it that leads millions of smart educated people like Obama, Chomsky, Clinton and the Pope to espouse suicidal utopian ideals that inexorably lead straight to Hell On Earth. As W noted, it is what is always before our eyes that is the hardest to see. We live in the world of conscious deliberative linguistic System 2, but it is unconscious, automatic reflexive System 1 that rules. This is Searle’s The Phenomenological Illusion (TPI), Pinker’s Blank Slate and Tooby and Cosmides Standard Social Science Model. Democracy and equality are wonderful ideals, but without strict controls, selfishness and stupidity gain the upper hand and soon destroy any nation and any world that adopts them. The monkey mind steeply discounts the future, and so we sell our children’s heritage for temporary comforts. It is my contention that the table of intentionality (rationality, mind, thought, language, personality etc.) that features prominently here describes more or less accurately, or at least serves an heuristic for how we think and behave, and so it encompasses not merely philosophy and psychology but everything else (history, literature, mathematics, politics etc.). Note especially that intentionality and rationality as I (along with Searle, Wittgenstein and others) view it, includes both conscious deliberative System 2 and unconscious automated System 1 actions or reflexes. Thus all the articles, like all behavior, are intimately connected if one knows how to look at them. As I note, The Phenomenological Illusion (oblivion to our automated System 1) is universal and extends not merely throughout philosophy but throughout life. I am sure that Chomsky, Obama, Zuckerberg and the Pope would be incredulous if told that they suffer from the same problem as Hegel, Husserl and Heidegger, but it’s clearly true. While the phenomenologists only wasted a lot of people’s time, they are wasting the earth."



فهرست مطالب

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface 1
WITTGENSTEIN, SEARLE AND THE TWO SYSTEMS OF THOUGHT
The Logical Structure of Consciousness (behavior, personality, rationality, higher order thought, intentionality) (2016) 6
The Logical Structure of Philosophy, Psychology, Mind and Language as Revealed in the Writings 11
of Ludwig Wittgenstein and John Searle (2016)
WITTGENSTEIN
The Foundation Stone of Psychology and Philosophy--a Critical Review of On Certainty' by Ludwig Wittgenstein (1969) (1951) 70
Review of Wittgenstein’s Metaphilosophy by Paul Horwich (2013) 95
Review of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations by David Stern (2004) 116
Review of Readings of Wittgenstein's On Certainty by Daniele Moyal-Sharrock Ed. (2007) 137
Review of 'Meaning and the Growth of Understanding Wittgenstein's Significance for Developmental Psychology'—Chapman and Dixon Eds.(1987) 149
Review of Wittgenstein Rethinking the Inner by Paul Johnston (1993) 161
Review of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology by Malcolm Budd (1989) 176
Review of Wittgenstein-a critical reader -- Hans-Johann Glock Ed. (2001) 191
Review of The Blue and Brown Books by Ludwig Wittgenstein 2nd ed. (1960) 206
Review of Paradox and Platitude in Wittgenstein's Philosophy by David Pears (2006) 208
Review of Ludwig Wittgenstein by Edward Kanterian (2007) 214
Review of Wittgenstein and Psychology A Practical Guide by Harre and Tissaw (2005) 219
Review of Culture and Value by Ludwig Wittgenstein (1980) 230
Review of The New Wittgenstein-- Crary & Read Eds 403p (2000) 233
Review of Understanding Wittgenstein's On Certainty by Daniele Moyal-Sharrock (2007) 239
Review of 'Tractatus Logico Philosophicus' by Ludwig Wittgenstein (1922) 246
Review of 'Wittgenstein and the End of Philosophy-by Daniel Hutto 2nd ed. (2006) 259
JOHN SEARLE and the CONSTRUCTION OF SOCIAL REALITY
Can there be a Chinese philosophy?--a Review of Searle's Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy -- Bo Mou Ed. 440p (2008) 271
Seeing With the Two Systems of Thought—a Review of 'Seeing Things As They Are: a Theory of Perception' by John Searle (2015) 293
Review of Making the Social World by John Searle (2010) 316
Review of 'John R Searle-Thinking About the Real World' by Franken et al eds. (2010) 334
Review of Philosophy in a New Century by John Searle (2008) 351




نظرات کاربران