The Green and the Blue: Digital Politics in Philosophical Discussion

Cover\nIntroduction\nThe Green and the Blue: A New Political Ontology for a Mature Information Society\n	1. Introduction\n	2. The idea of a transition from things to relationships\n	3. The idea of a human project\n	4. The idea of an infraethics\n	5. Ideas for a mature information society\n	6. Conclusion\nDiscussion\n	Reflections on the essay »The Green and the Blue – A new Political Ontology for a Mature Information Society« by Luciano Floridi\n		1. Information Society Impact\n		2. European Needs\n		3. Human Projects\n		4. From Things to Relationships\n		5. Future Driven by Technology\n		6. The Winners Take It All\n		7. Making Digital Technology Beneficial\n		8. Understanding the Digital\n		9. The Age of Design\n		10. On the Interplay between the Green and the Blue\n		11. China, the US and Europe\n		12. What is »good« politics for the Green and the Blue?\n		13. Other Colors\n	Being Human in the Digital Age: Comments on Floridi’s sketch for a New Political Ontology\n		1. Floridi’s (Social) Ontology\n		2. Being Human in the Digital Age\n	The information society: cause for a philosophical paradigm shift? A response to Luciano Floridi\n		1. The grand narrative of the mature information society\n		2. Questions to Luciano Floridi\n			2.1 On the argumentative role of digital transformation\n			2.2 On ontological individualism\n			2.3 On the integration of »blue« and »green«\n			2.4 On the frames of reference underlying the argumentation\n		3. Résumé\n	Out of the Box – into the Green and the Blue: A Plea for a Post-humanist Information Society\n		1. Out of the box\n		2. Beyond humanist and scientific ideals: The World of the Green and the Blue\n		3. Mapping the multitude: A new epistemology\n		4. Digital tribalism\n		5. Can AI be a good thing? A try\n		6. The post-humanist information society – A step into the Green and the Blue\n	Reflections on Floridi’s »The Green and the Blue: A New Political Ontology for a Mature Information Society«\n		1. Introduction\n		2. Floridi’s Approach to Politics in the Digital Age\n		3. Political Designs and Institutional Ethics\n		4. Evaluation of Floridi’s Approach\n			4.1 Does the digital society demand a new political ontology?\n			4.2 How do human projects interact with the norms of modern information societies?\n			4.3 How can ethical norms in modern information societies be implemented?\n		5. Concluding Remarks\n	Are philosophical questions open? Some thoughts about Luciano Floridi’s conception of philosophy as conceptual design and his new political ontology\n		1. Introduction\n		2. The openness of philosophical questions\n			2.1 Discussion of the first objection\n			2.2 Discussion of the second objection\n			2.3 Discussion of the third objection\n			2.4 Discussion of the fourth objection\n		3. From Metaphysics to Politics\n	A Responsible Knowledge Society Within a Colourful World: A Response to Luciano Floridi’s New Political Ontology\n		I.\n		II.\n		III.\n		IV.\n		V.\n		VI.\n		VII.\n	Replies to Broy, Gabriel, Grunwald, Hagengruber, Kriebitz, Lütge, Max, Misselhorn, and Rehbein\n		Preface to my replies\n		Reply to Manfred Broy\n		Reply to Markus Gabriel\n		Reply to Armin Grunwald\n		Reply to Ruth Edith Hagengruber\n		Reply to Alexander Kriebitz, Christoph Lütge, and Raphael Max\n		Reply to Catrin Misselhorn\n		Reply to Malte Rehbein\nMeta-Replies\n	A Brief Final Reflection on the Reply of Luciano Floridi to My Reply\n	Reply to Floridi’s Reply\n	Reply to a Reply: Knowledge in the Digitized World: The Third Knowledge Dimension\n	Reply to Luciano Floridi\nPostscript\nAbout the Contributors