دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش:
نویسندگان: Ruprecht von Waldenfels
سری: Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM]; 256
ISBN (شابک) : 9783110293777, 9783110293692
ناشر: De Gruyter Mouton
سال نشر: 2012
تعداد صفحات: 346
زبان: English
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود)
حجم فایل: 2 مگابایت
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب The Grammaticalization of 'Give' + Infinitive: A Comparative Study of Russian, Polish, and Czech به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب دستور زبان مصدر «بده»: مطالعه تطبیقی روسی، لهستانی و چکی نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
Acknowledgements\nConventions\n1 Introduction, overview and theoretical framework\n 1.1 Introduction\n 1.1.1 Give with an infinitive in Russian, Polish and Czech\n 1.1.2 Overview and structure of the study\n 1.2 Grammaticalization studies\n 1.3 Causatives\n 1.3.1 Definitions and basic notions\n 1.3.2 Permissive (‘letting’) causation\n 1.3.3 Curative factitive (‘having’) causation\n 1.3.4 Causative domains: from interpersonal to cognitive\n 1.3.5 Causee coding: Type I and Type II causatives\n 1.4 Modals and causatives\n 1.4.1 Modal domains in causation\n 1.4.2 Negation with modals and causatives\n 1.4.2.1 Types of negation and informativity\n 1.4.2.2 Modals and causatives on the square of oppositions\n 1.4.3 Conclusions\n2 da(va)t+inf in Russian\n 2.1 Introduction\n 2.1.1 Syntactic constructions\n 2.1.2 Material & Method\n 2.1.3 Prior research\n 2.2 Semasiological description of permissive da(va)t in Russian\n 2.2.1 Overview\n 2.2.2 Interpersonal causation\n 2.2.2.1 Profiles of usage\n 2.2.2.2 Semantic description\n 2.2.2.3 Polarity related meanings: negative causation\n 2.2.3 Manipulative causation\n 2.2.3.1 Profiles of usage\n 2.2.3.2 Semantic analyis\n 2.2.4 Impersonal causation\n 2.2.5 Conclusions: permissive da(va)t in three domains\n 2.2.6 Specific issues in the analysis of the permissive\n 2.2.6.1 Why is the perfective imperative daj! so frequent?\n 2.2.6.2 Reflexive permissives\n 2.2.6.3 Evidence for auxiliarization as event integration\n 2.2.7 Further constructions types\n 2.2.7.1 ‘Letting you know’: cognitive and perception verbs\n 2.2.7.2 Impersonal passive da(va)t plus infinitive\n 2.2.7.3 Secondary predication and referential use of infinitives\n 2.2.8 Summary\n3 da(va)t+inf in Polish\n 3.1 Introduction\n 3.1.1 Syntactic types\n 3.1.2 Prior research\n 3.1.3 Material & Method\n 3.2 Permissive da(va)t in Polish\n 3.2.1 Overview: reflexive and non-reflexive\n 3.2.2 Usage profiles\n 3.2.3 Non-reflexive permissive\n 3.2.4 Reflexive permissive\n 3.2.4.1 The causee phrase\n 3.2.4.2 Prepositional (type II) causees\n 3.2.4.3 The causee with dative reflexives\n 3.2.4.4 Conclusions: form and function of the causee phrase\n 3.2.5 Summary\n 3.3 Factitive da(va)t\n 3.3.1 Curative causation\n 3.3.2 Other types of factitive causation\n 3.3.3 Ambiguous permissive/factitive causation\n 3.3.4 Summary\n 3.4 Passive da(va)t plus infinitive\n 3.5 Cognitive and perception verbs\n 3.6 The modal passive\n 3.6.1 Types of the modal passive\n 3.6.2 Modal passive constructions and the reflexive permissive\n 3.6.3 Usage profiles\n 3.6.4 The aspect of dać się in subjectless MPs\n 3.6.4.1 Morphological criteria\n 3.6.4.2 Contextual criteria\n 3.6.4.3 Conclusions concerning the aspect of dać się\n 3.6.5 Conclusions: different degrees of grammaticalization\n 3.7 Summary\n4 da(va)t+inf in Czech\n 4.1 Introduction\n 4.1.1 Overview and prior research\n 4.1.2 Competition in causation: nech(áv)at with infinitive\n 4.1.3 Syntactic types\n 4.1.4 Data & annotation\n 4.2 Causative\n 4.2.1 Overview\n 4.2.2 Non-reflexive permissive\n 4.2.3 Reflexive permissive\n 4.2.3.1 Accusative reflexive\n 4.2.3.2 Dative and other reflexives\n 4.2.3.3 Comparison to nech(áv)at\n 4.2.3.4 Conclusions: permissive causation\n 4.2.4 Factitive\n 4.2.4.1 Curative and other interpersonal factitive\n 4.2.4.2 Manipulative and impersonal\n 4.2.4.3 Conclusions\n 4.2.5 Cognitive causation\n 4.2.6 Conclusions: causative dá(va)t\n 4.3 Modal passive\n 4.3.1 Overview\n 4.3.2 Agreeing and non-agreeing construction\n 4.3.3 Further characteristics\n 4.3.4 Conclusions: modal passive\n 4.4 Residual types\n 4.5 Summary and conclusions\n5 Czech, Polish and Russian in parallel\n 5.1 Introduction\n 5.1.1 The permissive\n 5.1.2 The factitive\n 5.1.3 The modal passive\n 5.1.4 Conclusions\n6 da(va)t+inf in OCS and earlier stages of Polish and Czech\n 6.1 Overview\n 6.2 da(va)t+inf in Old Curch Slavonie\n 6.3 A side glance at da(va)t+inf in Russian\n 6.4 da(va)t+inf in Czech\n 6.4.1 Permissive and factitive\n 6.4.2 The development of type II causees\n 6.4.3 The modal passive\n 6.5 da(va)t+inf in Polish\n 6.5.1 Permissive and reflexive permissive\n 6.5.2 Factitive causation\n 6.5.3 The modal passive\n 6.6 Conclusions\n7 Conclusions and directions for further research\n 7.1 Overview\n 7.2 Developments of da(va)t+inf\n 7.2.1 General remarks\n 7.2.2 From give to permissive\n 7.2.3 From permissive to reflexive permissive\n 7.2.4 Factitive: from give or from the permissive?\n 7.2.5 By-phrases: causatives as diathesis constructions\n 7.2.6 From reflexive permissive to agreeing modal passive\n 7.2.7 From agreeing to subjectless modal passives\n 7.3 Directions for further research\nNotes\nBibliography\nIndex