دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش: [1 ed.] نویسندگان: Frank Fischer (editor), Clark A. Chinn (editor), Katharina Engelmann (editor), Jonathan Osborne (editor) سری: ISBN (شابک) : 1138302260, 9781138302266 ناشر: Routledge سال نشر: 2018 تعداد صفحات: 290 [291] زبان: English فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود) حجم فایل: 5 Mb
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: The Roles of Domain-Specific and Domain-General Knowledge به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب استدلال علمی و استدلال: نقش دانش دامنه خاص و دامنه نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
شایستگی در استدلال علمی یکی از با ارزش ترین نتایج آموزش متوسطه و عالی است. با این حال، نیاز به درک عمیق تر و تحقیقات بیشتر در مورد نقش دانش عمومی و حوزه خاص در چنین استدلالی وجود دارد. این کتاب کارکردها و محدودیتهای مفاهیم کلی حوزه استدلال و استدلال، تفاوتهای اساسی که بین رشتهها وجود دارد و نقش دانش و معرفتشناسی خاص حوزه را بررسی میکند. استدلال و استدلال علمیبا ارائه فصول و تفاسیر توسط کارشناسان پراستناد در علوم یادگیری، روانشناسی تربیتی، آموزش علوم، آموزش تاریخ، و علوم شناختی، دیدگاههای جدیدی را در مورد یک بحث چند دهه در مورد نقش دانش خاص دامنه و سهم آن در توسعه توانایی های استدلال عمومی تر.
Competence in scientific reasoning is one of the most valued outcomes of secondary and higher education. However, there is a need for a deeper understanding of and further research into the roles of domain-general and domain-specific knowledge in such reasoning. This book explores the functions and limitations of domain-general conceptions of reasoning and argumentation, the substantial differences that exist between the disciplines, and the role of domain-specific knowledge and epistemologies. Featuring chapters and commentaries by widely cited experts in the learning sciences, educational psychology, science education, history education, and cognitive science, Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation presents new perspectives on a decades-long debate about the role of domain-specific knowledge and its contribution to the development of more general reasoning abilities.
Cover Half Title Title Page Copyright Page Table of Contents List of Contributors 1. The Roles of Domain-Specific and Domain-General Knowledge in Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: An Introduction Acknowledgments References Part 1: Exploring the Limits of Domain-Generality 2. In the Eye of the Beholder: Domain-General and Domain-Specific Reasoning in Science Why Modeling? Why the Commitment to a ‘Bottom-Up’ Approach to Learning? Conclusion Acknowledgments Note References 3. Domain-Specific Aspects of Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: Insights from Automatic Coding Theoretical Background Method Findings Discussion Conclusion Acknowledgments References 4. Construing Scientific Evidence: The Role of Disciplinary Knowledge in Reasoning with and about Evidence in Scientific Practice Introduction Domain Generality versus Domain Specificity in Scientific Reasoning: The Case of Evidence Research in Science Studies Looking Forward: Challenges for Research and Reform in Biology and Science Education Acknowledgments References 5. What is the Value of General Knowledge of Scientific Reasoning? Two Foundational Claims about Reasoning Degrees of Transfer Successful Performance on Scientific Reasoning Tasks in the Wild What Is the Value of General Reasoning Strategies and Practices? Conclusion Note References 6. Discussion of Papers and Reflections on “Exploring the Limits of Domain-Generality” Introduction Discussion of the Papers Reflections Stimulated by the Papers Concluding Comment Notes References Part 2: Exploring Disciplinary Frameworks 7. Domain-Specificity in the Practices of Explanation, Modeling, and Argument in the Sciences Introduction Processes of Reading and Argument in Science, History, and Literature Implications for Instruction and Student Learning in the READI Approach READI’s Disciplinary Core Constructs Generic versus Specific Tensions: The Case within Science Science Learning Goals and Supports for Evidence-Based Argument from Multiple Text Sources Summary Acknowledgments References 8. Historical Reasoning: The Interplay of Domain-Specific and Domain-General Aspects Introduction Historical Reasoning Tasks Conclusion and Discussion References 9. Styles of Scientific Reasoning: What Can We Learn from Looking at the Product, Not the Process, of Scientific Reasoning? Introduction Styles of Scientific Reasoning The Psychological Approach to Scientific Reasoning: A Partial Perpective Three Examples Implications for the Teaching of Scientific Reasoning Summary and Conclusion Notes References 10. Commentary on Exploring Disciplinary Frameworks Osborne Goldman, Ko, Greenleaf, and Brown Van Boxtel and van Drie References 11. Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: Is There an Over-Emphasis on Discipline Specificity? Doubts about Discipline Specificity Aspects of Discipline Specificity A Summary in Theses Note References Part 3: Exploring the Role of Domain-General Knowledge 12. Beyond Intelligence and Domain Knowledge: Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation as a Set of Cross-Domain Skills Introduction Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation as a Set of Cross-Domain Skills: A Theoretical Conceptualization Conclusions Summary Acknowledgments Note References 13. The Development of Scientific Thinking in Preschool and Elementary School Age: A Conceptual Model Introduction Scientific Thinking: Early Competencies Testing a Conceptual Model of the Development of Scientific Thinking Scientific Thinking and Cognitive Development Domain-General Scientific Thinking and the Acquisition of Domain-Specific Knowledge Conclusions Acknowledgment References 14. Specificity Reloaded: How Multiple Layers of Specificity Influence Reasoning in Science Argument Evaluation Introduction Three Layers of Scientific Knowledge: A Theoretical Account of Specificity Applying the Three Layers of Scientific Knowledge to Science Argument Evaluation Revisiting the Notion of Specificity: Theoretical and Educational Implications Summary Notes References 15. Scientific Reasoning as Domain-Specific or General Knowledge: A Discussion Knowledge and Tasks and a Way to Define ‘Domain’ Learning and Instruction Scientific Reasoning Summary References Index