Religions, Beliefs, and Education in the European Court of Human Rights: Investigating Judicial Pedagogies

Cover
Endorsement Page
Half Title
Series Page
Title Page
Copyright Page
Dedication
Table of Contents
Series editor foreword
Acknowledgements
List of acronyms and abbreviations
Chapter 1: Introduction: From Salzkotten to Strasbourg
	Salzkotten Primary School
	Background and outline
	Overview of subsequent chapters
	Notes
	References
Chapter 2: The ECtHR in Europe: Europeanisation, human rights and the role of the courts
	The European Court of Human Rights and other European institutions
	The Europeanisation of education: a research focus
	Europeanisation, religion and education
	The fundamental rights: freedom of belief and education
	Courts and educational decision-making
	Conclusion
	Notes
	References
Chapter 3: Judicial pedagogies: Concept and methodological approach
	The educational competence of the courts
	On the concept of judicial pedagogies
	An estranging methodology
	Conclusion
	Notes
	References
Chapter 4: Judicial definitions of education, convictions and indoctrination
	Philosophies of education
	The cases
		Defining education: Campbell and Cosans v. UK
		Defining convictions: Campbell and Cosans
		Defining indoctrination: Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark
	Conclusion
	Notes
	References
Chapter 5: Judicial assumptions about curriculum design
	Curriculum design in religious education
	The cases
		A difference in emphasis? Folgerø and others v. Norway
		Religions and their branches: the Turkish Alevi cases
	Conclusion
	Notes
	References
Chapter 6: Judicial assumptions about teachers and teaching
	Teaching as vocation or profession
	Teacher agency and curriculum
	Teacher talk
	The cases
		Professionalism and classroom questions: Dahlab v. Switzerland
		Vocation, loyalty and agency: Fernández Martínez v. Spain
	Conclusion
	Notes
	References
Chapter 7: Judicial assumptions about learners and learning
	Students’ mental development
	Individual and group learning
	Classroom dialogue
	Image, ritual and symbol in the classroom
	The cases
		Passive symbols and dialogue: Lautsi v. Italy
		A pedagogy of disagreement: Perovy v. Russia
		Swimming together: Osmanoğlu and Kocabaş v. Switzerland
	Conclusion
	Notes
	References
Chapter 8: Judicial assumptions about assessment and examinations
	Assessment and pupil learning
	School decision-making
	Qualification and selection
	Programme evaluation and system monitoring
	The cases
		Judicial silence on assessment: Zengin v Türkiye
		On the absence and averaging of marks: Saniewski and Grzelak
	Conclusion
	Notes
	References
Chapter 9: Discussion: Judicial pedagogies, coherence and Europeanisation
	Judicial pedagogies: models and metaphors
	The coherence of the ECtHR’s judicial pedagogies
	ECtHR and the Europeanisation of religions and beliefs in education
	Conclusion
	Notes
	References
Chapter 10: Conclusion: Investigating judicial pedagogies internationally
	Further studies of judicial pedagogies in Europe
	Judicial pedagogies internationally
		Judicial pedagogies in the US courts
		Judicial pedagogies in the South African courts
	Judicial pedagogies and judicial education
	Final remarks
	Notes
	References
Index