مشخصات کتاب

Paul's Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis (Library of New Testament Studies)

ویرایش:  
نویسندگان: Mika Hietanen  
سری:  
ISBN (شابک) : 0567031276, 9780567031273 
ناشر: T & T Clark 
سال نشر: 2007 
تعداد صفحات: 225 
زبان: English 
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود) 
حجم فایل: 12 مگابایت 

در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Paul's Argumentation in Galatians: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis (Library of New Testament Studies) به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.

توجه داشته باشید کتاب استدلال پولس در غلاطیان: تحلیل پراگما-دیالکتیکی (کتابخانه مطالعات عهد جدید) نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.

توضیحاتی در مورد کتاب استدلال پولس در غلاطیان: تحلیل پراگما-دیالکتیکی (کتابخانه مطالعات عهد جدید)



توضیحاتی درمورد کتاب به خارجی

Galatians is a polemical letter which contains a substantial amount of argumentative passages. Paul evidently wanted to persuade by using the best arguments possible to convince his addressees. Using a state-of-the-art method from the discipline of argumentation analysis, Paul's argumentation can be analysed with a precision that standard exegetical methods cannot provide. The pragma-dialectical method developed in Amsterdam facilitates an analysis which is both descriptive and normative. On the one hand, Paul's argumentation can be described, such as the relationship between premisses and conclusions, the structure of the arguments, and features relating to rhetorical strategy. On the other hand, the method makes it possible to evaluate Paul's argumentation against a set of rules for sound reasoning. Fallacies and problematic arguments can be described accurately. The spiritual nature of Paul's matters do not relieve him of rationality, and Paul himself does not argue as if it did. Paul's argumentation is found problematic in several respects. There is a tension in the text: Paul works a great deal to argue his claims while at the same time giving the impression that he merely wants to declare his standpoints and does not want to carry out an argumentation at all. Many of the conclusions are presented as self-evident, even when they are not. Paul's style is far from an ideal model of the resolution of a dispute. Paul relies heavily on an argumentative strategy with maximal use of rhetorical devices. The analysis shows that a contemporary method of argumentation analysis provides tools necessary to adequately describe and understand both individual arguments and the overarching strategy of the argumentation in a Pauline text.

نظرات کاربران

کتاب های تصادفی

دانلود کتاب 罗马法与帝国的遗产 古罗马政治思想史讲稿

دانلود کتاب Elements of Computer Networking. An Integrated Approach

دانلود کتاب Aging Issues in the United States and Japan (National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report)

دانلود کتاب Systemic Racism in America: Sociological Theory, Education Inequality, and Social Change

دانلود کتاب محبت داستانلاری