دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش: نویسندگان: George Bethell, Kirsteen Henderson, Hannah Kitchen, Richard Ruochen Li, Elizabeth Fordham, سری: OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education ISBN (شابک) : 9789264942981, 926494298X ناشر: سال نشر: 2019 تعداد صفحات: 258 زبان: English فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود) حجم فایل: 6 مگابایت
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education : student assessment in Turkey به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب : سنجش دانشجو در ترکیه نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
Foreword Acknowledgements Abbreviations and acronyms Executive summary Ensuring national goals provide a coherent vision to guide assessment Developing more effective assessment practices in the classroom Positively influencing learning through the national examinations and assessment Using the wider evaluation system to promote better assessment and learning Assessment and recommendations Introduction On-going reforms Main trends: Participation and learning outcomes have improved, but further progress is needed to meet national goals Participation in primary and lower secondary school is now universal but student drop out in upper secondary students is relatively high Graduation from tertiary education has also risen dramatically Student learning outcomes improved significantly between 2003 and 2012 Selection for the most prestigious high schools accentuates disparities Students’ outcomes frequently reflect the type of high school that they attend The role of student assessment in improving learning outcomes in Turkey Aligning assessment practice with national learning goals Achieving a greater balance between formative and summative assessment Using the wider evaluation system to encourage good assessment practice Promoting national goals for student learning Policy issue 2.1. Developing a curriculum framework to give greater coherence and clarity to national learning goals Policy issue 2.2. Developing learning standards to help teachers understand what students are expected to know and be able to do Policy issue 2.3. Communicating national learning goals to society to build trust and support for change Improving teachers’ classroom assessment practices Policy issue 3.1. Providing teachers with richer assessment resources that support competency acquisition Policy issue 3.2. Using formative feedback and reporting to better support student learning Policy issue 3.3. Reinforcing in-service training on assessment Policy issue 3.4. Improving teachers’ initial preparation in classroom assessment Ensuring national examinations and assessments positively influence the learning of all students Policy issue 4.1. Enhancing the school placement and selection process at the end of Grade 8 Policy issue 4.2. Ensuring that examinations at the end of compulsory education serve effectively the functions of certification and selection Policy issue 4.3. Developing and making available better-quality data on national learning outcomes Using the evaluation system to promote better assessment and learning Policy issue 5.1. Using appraisal to encourage and support teachers to employ good assessment practices Policy issue 5.2. Revising school evaluation to support learning and effective assessment practices Policy issue 5.3. Using system evaluation to help improve teaching, learning and assessment practices References Chapter 1. The Turkish education system Introduction The role of education in Turkey’s development Key features of the education system in Turkey Governance Turkey has a strong system of education planning and is increasingly focused on the quality of school outcomes The Ministry of National Education is responsible for all school-level policy Provincial and District Education Directorates are responsible for implementing national policy Schools in Turkey report that they have little autonomy Financing Public expenditure has increased rapidly over the past decade Central government is the main source of public expenditure on education Turkey has the highest level of private spending on schools within the OECD The structure of Turkey’s school system Education is now compulsory until the end of upper secondary school Students are tracked early into upper secondary schools The process of student selection into upper secondary education is under revision Placement into tertiary education is exam-based and highly competitive The selection exams carry very high stakes for students Secondary vocational education and training has expanded Turkey has encouraged an increase in the number of private schools Almost one-quarter of students attend open education high schools Double-shift schools and large class sizes are common in urban areas Turkey has made significant efforts to educate refugee children from Syria Teachers and school principals Turkey’s large teaching population is young and gender balanced Teaching is financially attractive, though the salary scale is relatively flat Teaching certification requirements have increased and there are plans to include more practical training in initial teacher education New teachers are assigned to their first positions, generally in challenging regions, based on their ranking in the teaching entrance exams Turkey has introduced an ambitious Teacher Strategy to improve teaching quality Curriculum The intended curriculum is competency-based and student-focused Full implementation of the curriculum requires further support The evaluation and assessment system Major changes are underway to evaluation and assessment policies in Turkey Main trends in participation, outcomes and equity Participation Access to education has increased dramatically But many students still do not complete a full cycle of schooling A fifth of 3- to 4-year-olds attended early childhood education in 2015 Participation in tertiary education has expanded Learning outcomes Students’ learning outcomes have improved significantly over the past decade Average achievement remains low compared to OECD countries More teachers are trying to use pedagogical practices associated with effective learning Classroom disruption and students skipping school can hinder learning After-school study support is limited Equity Equity in learning outcomes is improving Students in the most prestigious schools tend to come from more advantaged backgrounds Education access and outcomes vary significantly by geographic location Girls’ participation in school has increased significantly Conclusion Notes References Annex 1.A. Key indicators Chapter 2. Promoting national goals for student learning Introduction Context and main features National learning goals Focusing on competency-based learning Emphasising transversal, 21st century competencies Adopting a constructivist pedagogical approach Challenges in implementation The curriculum could more clearly support a constructivist approach Curricula are divided into domains and levels Curricula need clearer learning standards Parents pay considerable attention to students’ performance in national examinations Policy issues Policy issue 2.1. Developing a curriculum framework to give greater coherence and clarity to national learning goals Recommendation 2.1.1. Develop a unifying national curriculum framework Articulate the overall learning goals in a vision statement Describe the differences between competency-based and knowledge-based teaching and learning Define and promote transversal, 21st century competencies Explain constructivist pedagogy and provide examples of its usage Recommendation 2.1.2. Use the curriculum framework to guide future revisions of individual domain curricula Ensure that overall goals are well-represented in future domain-level curricula objectives Give stronger emphasis to competency-based learning in future domain-level curricula Align future domain-level curricula with constructivist approaches Policy issue 2.2. Developing learning standards to help teachers understand what students are expected to know and be able to do Recommendation 2.2.1. Develop learning standards Establish standards with performance levels in core subjects Develop learning standards around grade levels Support the use of standards Policy issue 2.3. Communicating national learning goals to society to build trust and support for change Recommendation 2.3.1. Make national learning goals more visible Build a national communications campaign Showcase examples of successful changes Recommendation 2.3.2. Expand local support for schools Bring centres of support closer to schools Promote peer-learning and networking Conclusion References Chapter 3. Improving teachers’ classroom assessment practices Introduction Context and main features of classroom assessment Policy framework The curriculum encourages teachers to use a broad range of assessments to support competency development A series of reforms in 2017 aims to support more effective classroom assessment practice Classroom assessment regulations and resources Central regulations reaffirm the importance of using varied assessment types Responsibilities for classroom assessment Principals and teachers report developing and using their own assessments less than in other OECD countries Use of classroom assessment results Assessments carry stakes for selection to the next level of education Assessments have an important role for progression in upper secondary Teachers’ assessment capacity Initial teacher education covers classroom assessment but is more theoretical than practical The Ministry of National Education and the provincial directorates share responsibility for professional development Policy issues Policy issue 3.1. Providing teachers with richer assessment resources that support competency acquisition Recommendation 3.1.1. Help teachers to monitor learning in line with national standards Develop rubrics and exemplars to help teachers apply national learning standards in their classroom practice Develop diagnostic assessments to ensure that students are meeting national standards Introduce early grade assessments that are age appropriate with a clearly defined formative function Provide additional resources to address the needs of students identified as being at risk of falling behind Support teachers to use the results from standardised assessments to monitor learning Recommendation 3.1.2. Provide teachers with tools to assess a wider range of competencies Develop nationally validated assessment instruments Provide guidance to support the development and implementation of classroom assessments Develop and fully implement the e-portfolio Recommendation 3.1.3. Redesign the EBA portal to provide a broader range of better-quality resources Ensure that the ministry leads the development of EBA Involve teachers in the redesign of EBA Identify resources to be developed as a priority Policy issue 3.2. Using formative feedback and reporting to better support student learning Recommendation 3.2.1. Encourage more formative feedback in the classroom Help teachers to learn about and practice different feedback techniques Provide school-level support for effective feedback Adapt teaching standards and regulations to ensure that formative assessment and feedback are central to teaching Recommendation 3.2.2. Use reporting to help parents and students better understand learning levels and next steps Report student performance against national learning standards Consider how to report the development of transversal competencies Incorporate qualitative feedback when reporting student performance Clearly communicate changes to students, parents and teachers Policy issue 3.3. Reinforcing in-service training on assessment Recommendation 3.3.1. Make training on classroom assessment a top professional development priority Require all teachers to undertake professional development on assessment Ensure that professional development reflects teachers’ needs Connect professional development to teachers’ classroom practices Make professional development more responsive to national priorities to reduce summative testing Develop facilitators’ assessment expertise Make greater use of technology to expand professional development Proceed with plans to adopt standards for effective professional learning Recommendation 3.3.2. Develop school-based professional learning on assessment Provide leadership for school-level professional development activities on assessment Provide dedicated time for teachers to work together on assessment Develop school-based moderation practices Policy issue 3.4. Improving teachers’ initial preparation in classroom assessment Recommendation 3.4.1. Ensure sufficient coverage of classroom assessment in initial teacher preparation Use new teacher competencies to inform the development of initial teacher education programme content on assessment Implement the tertiary accreditation process, and incorporate new teacher assessment competencies into the accreditation requirements Establish an advisory committee with representatives from the ministry and the Council of Higher Education to enhance the initial preparation of teachers Recommendation 3.4.2. Ensure that initial preparation in classroom assessment is practical and connected to the school curriculum Cover classroom assessment in the practicum Model the assessment practices teachers will need to use in the classroom Build the classroom assessment capacity of initial teacher education providers Use the induction period to continue developing the capacity for assessment Conclusion References Chapter 4. Ensuring national examinations and assessments support learning Introduction Context and main features of examinations and national assessment Responsibilities for examinations and assessment The General Directorate of Measurement, Evaluation and Examination Services is supporting national assessment capacity The central examination at the end of compulsory education is the responsibility of the ÖSYM, which is separate from the ministry National examinations There have been multiple reforms to the examination at the end of Grade 8 for high school placement Since September 2018, the vast majority of Turkish students starting high school have been placed in a school within their local area A minority of school places are determined by a centralised examination The examination at the end of Grade 12 serves as the gatekeeper for tertiary education institutions and programmes The 2018 examination reforms aimed to reduce pressure on students Competition for a place on a bachelor’s programme is intense Open examinations are available for those who have followed alternative educational routes Assessments A new national assessment, ABİDE, has the potential to fill an important gap in reliable data on learning outcomes Regular participation in international student assessments provides periodic information on student performance against international benchmarks Other types of diplomas and certification Turkish students completing compulsory education receive a diploma Policy issues Policy issue 4.1. Enhancing the school placement and selection process at the end of Grade 8 Recommendation 4.1.1. Consider the system for high school placement to manage demand Ensure that students and parents understand how the new placement system will operate Develop transparent criteria for oversubscribed schools Recommendation 4.1.2. Provide more information to guide student choice, while improving flexibility between pathways Develop resources, like the new e-portfolios and career guidance, to inform students’ high school preferences Create greater flexibility across upper secondary programmes Recommendation 4.1.3. Reduce any negative distortions created by the high school entrance examination Consider measures to ensure that students from disadvantaged backgrounds have a fair chance of accessing selective schools Design the high school entrance examination to reduce negative backwash for teaching and learning Improve the discriminatory power of the examination Policy issue 4.2. Ensuring that examinations at the end of compulsory education serve effectively the functions of certification and selection Recommendation 4.2.1. Develop a national examination to help certify achievement at the end of compulsory education Determine the main purpose of the school-leaving examination Determine which subjects will be assessed Determine how the examination will be marked Consider the types of questions that will be used Consider including a small share of teacher-assessed work Recommendation 4.2.2. Enhance the validity of the university placement examination Make fuller use of technology to enable a wider range of item types Give students more time and reconsider how the correction formula is used to reduce the pressure on students Reduce the grades that contribute to the final placement score Consider how to draw on wider sources of evidence for university placement in the future Recommendation 4.2.3. Improve the reliability and validity of school-based assessments Provide teachers and schools with instructions for the school-based components of examinations Ensure a sufficiently robust system for standardising, checking and moderating the marks awarded by teachers Policy issue 4.3. Developing and making available better-quality data on national learning outcomes Recommendation 4.3.1. Provide schools with meaningful examination data to improve teaching and learning Provide schools with more comprehensive examination data Provide item-level analysis to improve teaching and learning Recommendation 4.3.2. Implement ABİDE as a fully developed national assessments in primary and lower secondary Create a steering committee to guide the development of ABİDE Define the purpose of ABİDE Continue with plans to implement ABİDE in Grades 4 and 8 and make at least one a full cohort assessment Address other key questions for the implementation of ABİDE Use the national assessment to improve teaching and assessment literacy Conclusion References Annex 4.A. International examples of using optical character recognition (OCR) technologies in high stakes examinations Chapter 5. Using the evaluation system to promote better assessment and learning Introduction Context and main features of the evaluation system Teacher appraisal Turkey has recently published new teacher competencies Criteria for teacher appraisal focus on how frequently teachers demonstrate performance indicators A new performance appraisal is an underdevelopment A recently introduced probation appraisal is based on multiple types of evaluation Teachers progress up the salary scale primarily based on years of service and positive results from regular appraisals School evaluation Turkey has multiple frameworks for self-evaluation in different types of schools The Education Quality Management System The Basic Institutional Standards System System evaluation The Strategic Plan 2015-19 makes improving student learning outcomes a priority The introduction of new national assessments would provide valuable information on learning outcomes Policy issues Policy issue 5.1. Using appraisal to encourage and support teachers to employ good assessment practices Recommendation 5.1.1. Ensure that appraisal reflects the breadth and depth of assessment competency important for learning Ensure that appraisal is coherent with national learning goals Develop appraisal criteria that cover key competencies for assessment Illustrate assessment competencies with examples of effective practice Develop specific levels of assessment competency for different stages in the teacher career path Focus on quality when evaluating assessment practices Use authentic evidence of classroom practice to identify underperformance Recommendation 5.1.2. Ensure that evaluators focus on authentic measures of teachers’ assessment practice Provide more guidance for evaluating assessment practices during classroom observation Ensure that appraisal includes evidence of learning progress Reconsider how the written examination for probation appraisal is used Recommendation 5.1.3. Use appraisal results to develop teachers’ assessment competency Ensure that appraisal provides teachers with useful feedback Use professional development plans to link appraisal to professional development Policy issue 5.2. Revising school evaluation to support learning and effective assessment practices Recommendation 5.2.1. Ensure that the school inspection framework reinforces national objectives for learning and good assessment practices Focus inspection indicators for learning outcomes on national learning standards Introduce expectations for learning outcomes in Grades 1 to 3 Include indicators on the quality of assessment practices Include indicators on school-wide strategies to support improved use of assessment Look for evidence of strategies to monitor and support students at risk of falling behind Illustrate indicators with examples of effective practice Provide schools with actionable recommendations Recommendation 5.2.2. Use self-evaluation to focus schools on developing their assessment capacity Create a single framework for self-evaluation based on core indicators in the inspection framework Provide schools with space to add indicators Use “challenge” questions to encourage critical inquiry Use inspections to build schools’ capacity for improving their use of assessment Policy issue 5.3. Using system evaluation to help improve teaching, learning and assessment practices Recommendation 5.3.1. Ensure that targets for education support national priorities Set goals that aim to raise performance Provide the public with a more comprehensive picture of school performance Recommendation 5.3.2. Help schools use evaluation information for improvement Undertake more central analysis to inform policy Encourage provinces to undertake more analysis to understand the challenges for schools in their region Develop principals’ capacity to act thoughtfully on evaluation information Provide targeted support to schools in greatest need Conclusion Notes References Blank Page