Managerial Attitudes Toward a Stakeholder Prominence Within a Southeast Asia Context: An Empirical Study in Asia

Managerial Attitudes Toward a Stakeholder Prominence within a Southeast Asia Context......Page 4
Copyright page......Page 5
Contents......Page 6
List of Figures......Page 8
List of Tables......Page 10
Abstract......Page 12
1.1. Introduction......Page 14
1.2. Why should there be a study on stakeholder prominence in these three countries?......Page 15
1.3. Outline of the study......Page 20
1.4. Contributions to existing stakeholder literature......Page 22
1.5. Structure of the study......Page 24
1.6. Conclusion......Page 26
Notes......Page 27
2.2. What constitutes a stakeholder theory?......Page 30
2.3. Early stakeholder literature......Page 32
2.4. Mainstream stakeholder literature......Page 37
2.5. Literature summary......Page 56
2.6. Conclusion......Page 62
Notes......Page 63
3.1. Introduction......Page 66
3.2. Toward a positive stakeholder theory......Page 67
3.3. Data collection method......Page 78
3.4. Sample......Page 80
3.5. Stakeholders......Page 83
3.6. Determining stakeholder prominence......Page 87
3.7. Stakeholder classes......Page 89
3.8. The analytical hierarchy process......Page 91
3.10. Tests for multiple comparisons......Page 96
3.12. Conclusion......Page 97
Notes......Page 99
4.1. Introduction......Page 102
4.2. The relationship between development and stakeholder prominence......Page 103
4.3. Economic characteristics affecting stakeholder prominence......Page 109
4.4. Social characteristics affecting stakeholder prominence......Page 110
4.5. Hypothesised stakeholder development across countries......Page 119
4.6. Conclusion......Page 123
Notes......Page 124
5.1. Introduction......Page 126
5.3. Data scoring and analysis......Page 127
5.4. Descriptive statistics......Page 128
5.5. Stakeholder prominence by country of origin......Page 130
5.6. Stakeholder prominence by occupation......Page 134
5.7. Stakeholder legitimacy......Page 143
5.8. Stakeholder power......Page 146
5.9. Stakeholder urgency......Page 149
5.10. Overview of the results......Page 150
5.11. Conclusion......Page 155
Notes......Page 157
6.2. Implications for a ‘‘positive theory’’ of stakeholder choice......Page 158
6.3. Implications for managerial strategy......Page 163
Notes......Page 170
7.2. Summary of study......Page 172
7.3. Limitations......Page 174
7.4. Implications of the results of the study......Page 179
7.5. Future research......Page 181
7.6. Conclusion......Page 183
Note......Page 184
Appendix A. A glossary of key terms......Page 186
Appendix A. (Continued•)......Page 187
Appendix B. Summary use of stakeholder terminology......Page 189
Appendix C. Chronological summary of stakeholder literature......Page 191
Appendix C. (Continued•)......Page 192
Appendix C. (Continued•)......Page 193
Appendix C. (Continued•)......Page 194
Appendix C. (Continued•)......Page 195
Appendix C. (Continued•)......Page 196
Appendix C. (Continued•)......Page 197
Appendix C. (Continued•)......Page 198
Appendix C. (Continued•)......Page 199
Appendix C. (Continued•)......Page 200
Appendix C. (Continued•)......Page 201
Appendix C. (Continued•)......Page 202
Appendix C. (Continued•)......Page 203
Appendix D. Stakeholder questionnaire......Page 204
Asia-Pacific stakeholder questionnaire......Page 205
Appendix E. List of corporations surveyed......Page 210
Appendix E. (Continued•)......Page 211
Appendix E. (Continued•)......Page 212
Appendix E. (Continued•)......Page 213
Appendix E. (Continued•)......Page 214
Appendix E. (Continued•)......Page 215
Appendix E. (Continued•)......Page 216
Appendix E. (Continued•)......Page 217
Appendix E. (Continued•)......Page 218
Appendix F. Stakeholder prominence results......Page 219
Appendix F. (Continued•)......Page 221
References......Page 222