Governance of Climate Responsive Cities: Exploring Cross-Scale Dynamics (The Urban Book Series)

Preface
Acknowledgements
Contents
Editors and Contributors
1 Governance of Climate Responsive Cities: Scale Matters!
	References
2 Resilience, Uncertainty, and Adaptive Planning
	2.1 Introduction
	2.2 The Growing Popularity of Resilience
	2.3 Multiple Genealogies of Resilience
		2.3.1 Engineering Resilience: Absolute Space and Blueprint Planning
		2.3.2 Evolutionary Resilience: Relational Space and Adaptive Planning
	2.4 Conclusion
	References
3 Barriers to Implementing Local Climate Action Plans in Turkey: Searching for a Potential Way Out
	3.1 Introduction
	3.2 Going Beyond Climate Policies: Making Action Happen
	3.3 Climate Change Agenda in Turkey: Prospect from National to Local
	3.4 Methodological Framework
	3.5 Exploring Municipal Level Climate Action in Turkish Municipalities
		3.5.1 The Common Challenges of Local Action
		3.5.2 A Potential Way Out Through Climate Governance
	3.6 Ending Remarks
	References
4 Exploring the Governance of Naples, Italy, Through a Climate Responsive Approach
	4.1 Introduction: How the Challenge of Climate Change Is Changing European Cities
	4.2 Methodology
	4.3 National Climate Policy in Italy
	4.4 The Governance of Climate Change in the Urban Region of Naples
		4.4.1 How CC Entered the Public Discourse
		4.4.2 How CC Entered the Agenda-Setting of the City of Naples
		4.4.3 How CC Entered the Agenda-Setting of the Metropolitan City of Naples
	4.5 Conclusions
	References
5 Community Engagement in Climate Change Policy: The Case of Three Mills, East London
	5.1 Introduction
	5.2 Impacts of Climate Change
	5.3 Vulnerability and Climate Change
	5.4 Climate Change Governance
	5.5 Community Engagement
	5.6 Three Mills, East London
	5.7 Community Engagement in Three Mills
		5.7.1 Cultural Ecosystems Mapping
		5.7.2 Active Energy
		5.7.3 Design Exhibition
	5.8 Conclusion
	References
6 Co-design of a Nature-Based Solutions Ecosystem for Reactivating a Peri-Urban District in Quito, Ecuador
	6.1 Introduction
	6.2 Contextual Framework of SEV
	6.3 Nature-Based Solutions as a Tool for Resilient and Sustainable Urban Planning
		6.3.1 Water Management
		6.3.2 Comfortable and Healthy Public Space
		6.3.3 Relationship with Nature
	6.4 Methodology: Co-design Process
		6.4.1 From Traditional Workshops and Meetings with SEV Residents…
		6.4.2 …To a Shared Diagnosis
		6.4.3 Completed by a Collaborative Urbanism Process
		6.4.4 Validation of the Proposal by the Neighborhood Assembly
	6.5 Shared Outcomes of SEV
		6.5.1 Green Network: Connected City Ravines and Urban Green Corridors
		6.5.2 Nature as a New Type of Economic Driver: A Bet on Urban Forestry and Agriculture (Organization, Infrastructure, Added Value)
		6.5.3 Development of Private Construction: Toward Green Real Estate Development
		6.5.4 Nature as an Urban Technical Solution: Water Management, Shade, and New Landscapes
	6.6 Reflections on the Co-design Experience in SEV
	6.7 Concluding Remarks
	References
7 How Co-design of Public Space Contributes to Strengthening Resilience: Lessons from Two Chilean Cases
	7.1 Introduction
	7.2 Applying the Evolutionary Resilience Framework to Urban Co-design
	7.3 Method
	7.4 Cases
	7.5 Research Findings and Discussion
		7.5.1 Enablers of Collaboration and Design
		7.5.2 Barriers for Collaboration and Design
		7.5.3 Barriers Adapted, Turning into Enablers
		7.5.4 Barriers Transformed into Enablers
	7.6 Conclusions
	References
8 Informal Green Infrastructure (IGI) and the Pursuit of Climate Responsive Environments in Quito City
	8.1 Introduction
	8.2 Green Infrastructure for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation
		8.2.1 Green Infrastructure in Informal Settlements
	8.3 The Approach for Tracing IGIs
	8.4 The Informal Settlements Context in Quito
		8.4.1 Community Allotments: Climate Change Mitigation and Gender
		8.4.2 Footpaths as Climate Responsive Mobility Infrastructure of Informal Settlements
		8.4.3 Pitches as IGIs: Community Empowerment While Managing Stormwater Runoff
	8.5 Conclusion
	References
9 Co-designing Local Climate Action: A Methodological Framework from a Democratic Perspective
	9.1 Introduction
	9.2 Coping with Climate Change as a Democratic Act
	9.3 Participation as a Salient Condition in Any Act
	9.4 Action as an Ultimate Force for Making the Plan Happen
	9.5 Process as a Methodological Framework for Participation and Action
		9.5.1 Mobilization of Actors
		9.5.2 Process Design of Participatory Climate Action Planning
	9.6 Final Words
	References