دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش:
نویسندگان: Mele. Alfred R
سری:
ISBN (شابک) : 9780199371624, 0199371628
ناشر: Oxford University Press
سال نشر: 2014
تعداد صفحات: 113
زبان: English
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود)
حجم فایل: 3 مگابایت
کلمات کلیدی مربوط به کتاب رایگان: چرا علم اراده آزاد را رد نکرده است: اراده آزاد و جبر. فلسفه / اخلاق و فلسفه اخلاق. فلسفه / ذهن و بدن. فلسفه / متافیزیک. اراده آزاد علوم اعصاب روانشناسی اجتماعی.
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Free : why science hasn't disproved free will به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب رایگان: چرا علم اراده آزاد را رد نکرده است نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
"Scientists have
forged a penetrating, coherent course in the study of human
thought and action. Yet some of the same scientists have
slashed out an adjacent, rough-hewn path, cutting at the
roots of the belief in free will and at the groundwork of
relationships among the conscious will, the mind, and the
brain. Claiming to disprove the existence of free will is not
only wrongheaded, Mele argues, but harmful; research shows
that people who don't believe they are free are more likely
to behave badly, as they sink into feeling like they aren't
responsible for their actions. Putting a positive spin on
this, Mele conveys what he calls the 'good news' that we are
freer than we think. If we see ourselves as morally
responsible for our future actions, we can begin to view
ourselves as having abilities and capacities that give us
considerable control over what we do. Mele takes apart the
findings of neuroscience and psychology experiments often
cited as irrefutably disproving the existence of free will,
for example those of Benjamin Libet, and demonstrates that
their results have been misinterpreted. Mele explains why the
experimental findings are actually consistent with our making
many of our decisions consciously and with our having
considerable control over many of our decisions and actions.
In order to find truth and clarity on this crucial topic,
Mele argues, philosophers, scientists, and psychologists
alike need to explore one another's work rather than relying
on scientific findings - and a rigid interpretation of those
findings- as the only key to solving the complex puzzle that
is free will"-- Read
more...
Abstract: "Does free will exist? The question has fueled
heated debates spanning from philosophy to psychology and
religion. The answer has major implications, and the stakes
are high. To put it in the simple terms that have come to
dominate these debates, if we are free to make our own
decisions, we are accountable for what we do, and if we
aren't free, we're off the hook. There are neuroscientists
who claim that our decisions are made unconsciously and are
therefore outside of our control and social psychologists who
argue that myriad imperceptible factors influence even our
minor decisions to the extent that there is no room for free
will. According to philosopher Alfred R. Mele, what they
point to as hard and fast evidence that free will cannot
exist actually leaves much room for doubt. If we look more
closely at the major experiments that free will deniers cite,
we can see large gaps where the light of possibility shines
through. In Free: Why Science Hasn't Disproved Free Will,
Mele lays out his opponents' experiments simply and clearly,
and proceeds to debunk their supposed findings, one by one,
explaining how the experiments don't provide the solid
evidence for which they have been touted. There is powerful
evidence that conscious decisions play an important role in
our lives, and knowledge about situational influences can
allow people to respond to those influences rationally rather
than with blind obedience. Mele also explores the meaning and
ramifications of free will. What, exactly, does it mean to
have free will -- is it a state of our soul, or an
undefinable openness to alternative decisions? Is it
something natural and practical that is closely tied to moral
responsibility? Since evidence suggests that denying the
existence of free will actually encourages bad behavior, we
have a duty to give it a fair chance"--
"Scientists have forged a penetrating, coherent course in the study of human thought and action. Yet some of the same scientists have slashed out an adjacent, rough-hewn path, cutting at the roots of the belief in free will and at the groundwork of relationships among the conscious will, the mind, and the brain. Claiming to disprove the existence of free will is not only wrongheaded, Mele argues, but harmful; research shows that people who don't believe they are free are more likely to behave badly, as they sink into feeling like they aren't responsible for their actions. Putting a positive spin on this, Mele conveys what he calls the 'good news' that we are freer than we think. If we see ourselves as morally responsible for our future actions, we can begin to view ourselves as having abilities and capacities that give us considerable control over what we do. Mele takes apart the findings of neuroscience and psychology experiments often cited as irrefutably disproving the existence of free will, for example those of Benjamin Libet, and demonstrates that their results have been misinterpreted. Mele explains why the experimental findings are actually consistent with our making many of our decisions consciously and with our having considerable control over many of our decisions and actions. In order to find truth and clarity on this crucial topic, Mele argues, philosophers, scientists, and psychologists alike need to explore one another's work rather than relying on scientific findings - and a rigid interpretation of those findings- as the only key to solving the complex puzzle that is free will"
Content: Decisions, decisions --
Benjamin Libet: If not now, when? --
Is free will adrift in new-wave neuroscience? --
Good intentions --
Tough situations --
Free will and evidence.