دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
دسته بندی: فلسفه ویرایش: نویسندگان: Joseph Andrew Bjelde, David Merry, Christopher Roser سری: Argumentation Library, 39 ISBN (شابک) : 3030708160, 9783030708160 ناشر: Springer سال نشر: 2021 تعداد صفحات: 283 زبان: English فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود) حجم فایل: 6 مگابایت
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب مقالاتی در باب استدلال در دوران باستان نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
Introduction Contents 1 Truth Attending Persuasion: Forms of Argumentation in Parmenides 1.1 Road of Truth 1.2 Missing Premises 1.3 Signs of Necessity Works Cited 2 Argumentation and Persuasion in Classical Chinese Literature Bibliography 3 Gorgias and the Weakness of Logos 3.1 Some Preliminaries 3.2 Gorgias and the Power of logos: The ‘Encomium of Helen’ 3.3 Gorgias and the Weakness of Logoi: The ‘Defense of Palamedes’ References 4 Plato’s Dialogues: Dialectic, Orality and Character 4.1 Public Debates and Dialectic as Regimented Debate 4.2 Rules for Dialectical Bouts 4.3 From Oral to Written Arguments: The Delimitation Problem 4.4 Classifying Plato’s Dialogues 4.5 Argumentation Theory References 5 What is the Difference Between the Dialectical and Rhetorical Use of Arguments? A Paradigm-Based Approach to Plato’s Socrates 5.1 Introduction 5.2 The Problems of the Common Interpretations and the Manifold Differences Between Rhetoric and Dialectic 5.2.1 Option One: The Role of Persuasion 5.2.2 Option Two: The Good vs. The Bad Persuasion 5.2.3 Option Three: The Procedure and Form of the Argumentation 5.2.4 Option Four: Requirements for the Arguments Used 5.2.5 Option Five: The Importance of Methodology 5.2.6 Option Six: A Difference in Content and the Role of the Ti-Estin Question 5.2.7 Option Seven: Context or General Worldview 5.2.8 Summary 5.3 The Consequences 5.4 Conclusion Bibliography 6 Platonic βραχυλογία and Aristotle on Say-What-You-Believe 6.1 A Manner of Speaking 6.2 Plato’s Gorgias and Aristotle 6.3 Say-What-You-Believe Requirements References 7 Rhetoric, Dialectic and Shame in Plato’s Gorgias 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Gorgias, Polus and Callicles 7.3 Socrates’ Theses 7.4 Challenging the Dogmatic Reading 7.5 Socrates’ Inconclusive Elenchus 7.6 Elenchus and Free Speech 7.7 Elenchus and Fairness 7.8 A Myth About Real Justice References 8 The Prospects for Rhetoric in the Late Plato 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Vickers’ View of Plato 8.3 Dialectic and Rhetoric 8.4 The Position of the Later Dialogues (Sophist, Statesman, Philebus, and Laws) 8.5 Conclusion: The Reluctant Rhetorician—Plato’s Recognition of the Power of Rhetoric References 9 Does Plato Have a Theory of Induction? Epagōgē and the Method of Collection “Purified” of the Senses 9.1 Introduction 9.2 The Meaning of Epagōgē 9.3 Robinson’s Rejection of Platonic Epagōgē 9.4 A Refutation of Robinson 9.5 Collection as Generalization from Sensibles 9.6 Purification in the Sophist 9.7 The Statesman on Purification 9.8 The Purification of Collection 9.9 The God-Given Path 9.10 Reflections on Epagōgē in Aristotle and Plato References 10 Endoxa and Epistemology in Aristotle’s Topics 10.1 The Epistemological Role Envisioned for Dialectic in the Topics 10.2 How Could Dialectical Skill Help 10.3 What Are Endoxa? 10.4 The Platonic Account References 11 Was Aristotle a Virtue Argumentation Theorist? 11.1 What Are Virtue Theories of Argumentation? 11.1.1 Virtue Epistemology 11.1.2 Critical Thinking Dispositions 11.1.3 Virtues of Argument 11.2 What Does Aristotle Say About Character and Argument? 11.2.1 Topics VIII 11.2.2 Rhetoric I 11.2.3 Rhetoric II 11.3 Is the Phronimos an Ideal Arguer? References 12 Seneca’s Argumentation and Moral Intuitionism 12.1 Moral Intuitionism and Sinnott-Armstrong’s Objection 12.2 How Seneca Argues 12.2.1 The Source of Moral Illusions 12.2.2 Semi-Formal Strategies for Undoing Illusions 12.2.3 The Argumentative Context 12.3 Updated Senecean Intuitionism References 13 Aristotelian Dialectic, Argumentation Theory and Artificial Intelligence 13.1 Introduction 13.2 Standard Types of Dialogue in Argumentation Theory 13.3 Aristotle on Classifying Types of Arguments and Reasoning 13.4 The Core Structure of Aristotelian Dialectic 13.5 Dialectical Features Surrounding the Core Structure 13.6 Deliberation Dialogue 13.7 Examination Dialogue 13.8 Schemes and Dialogues in Artificial Intelligence 13.9 Mapping Dialogues into Argument Diagrams 13.10 Conclusions References