دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش: [1st ed. 2021]
نویسندگان: Oliver Hofmann
سری:
ISBN (شابک) : 9783030625245, 3030625249
ناشر: Springer
سال نشر: 2021
تعداد صفحات: 275
[271]
زبان: English
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود)
حجم فایل: 5 Mb
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Breach of Contract: An Economic Analysis of the Efficient Breach Scenario (International Law and Economics) به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب نقض قرارداد: تحلیل اقتصادی سناریوی نقض کارآمد (حقوق بینالملل و اقتصاد) نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
«نقض کارآمد» یکی از موضوعات مورد بحث در ادبیات حقوق و اقتصاد است. چه راه حلی طرفین قرارداد را تشویق می کند که قراردادها را در صورت کارآمدی و تنها در صورت کارآمد بودن انجام دهند؟ این کتاب بر اساس تحلیلی عمیق از تأثیر ساختار بازار، عدم تقارن اطلاعات و انحرافات از مدل انتخاب منطقی، برداشت جدیدی را ارائه میکند. نویسنده دو راه حل غالب برای نقض قرارداد را که توسط اکثر حوزه های قضایی اتخاذ شده است و همچنین دسترسی به کنوانسیون های بین المللی مانند کنوانسیون قراردادهای فروش بین المللی کالا (CiSG) را مقایسه می کند: خسارات مربوط به عملکرد و انتظارات. این کتاب پیچیدگی چنین مقایسه ای را در مفروضات واقعی تر نشان می دهد. نویسنده نشان می دهد که هیچ پاسخ ساده ای ممکن نیست، اما باید شرایط را در نظر گرفت. این مقایسه یک رویکرد اقتصادی به قانون به کارگیری نظریه بازی دارد. مدلهای نظری بازی در کل کتاب ثابت هستند که درک این موضوع را برای خواننده آسان میکند که مفروضات مختلف در مورد ساختار بازار، توزیع اطلاعات و انحرافات از مدل انتخاب منطقی چه تأثیراتی دارند و چگونه آنها در هم تنیده شدهاند.
“Efficient breach” is one of the most discussed topics in the literature of law and economics. What remedy incentivizes the parties of a contract to perform contracts if and only if it is efficient? This book provides a new perception based on an in-depth analysis of the impact the market structure, asymmetry of information, and deviations from the rational choice model have, comprehensively. The author compares the two predominant remedies for breach of contract which have been adopted by most jurisdictions and also found access to international conventions like the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CiSG): Specific performance and expectation damages. The book illustrates the complexity such a comparison has under more realistic assumptions. The author shows that no simple answer is possible, but one needs to account for the circumstances. The comparison takes an economic approach to law applying game theory. The game-theoretic models are consistent throughout the entire book which makes it easy for the reader to understand what effects different assumptions about the market structure, the distribution of information, and deviations from the rational choice model have, and how they are intertwined.
Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Content of the Analysis 1.1.1 Scenario 1.1.2 Method: Law and Economics 1.1.2.1 Welfare Economics 1.1.2.2 Homo Economicus 1.1.2.3 Behavioral Law and Economics 1.1.3 Remedies 1.1.3.1 Specific Performance 1.1.3.2 Expectation Damages 1.1.3.3 Penalty Clauses 1.1.3.4 Liquidated Damages 1.1.3.5 Property and Liability Rules 1.2 Limits of the Analysis 1.2.1 Method 1.2.2 Enforcement of Contracts 1.2.3 Optimal Investment 1.2.4 Type of Rules References Chapter 2: Breach or Perform Decision: The Traditional Model of the Efficient Breach 2.1 Expectation Damages 2.2 Specific Performance and Renegotiating the Contract References Chapter 3: Distributional Effects and the Original Contract 3.1 Price Mechanism 3.2 Interaction Between Remedies and Bargaining Power 3.2.1 Determinants of Bargaining Power 3.2.2 Discount Factors 3.2.3 Disagreement Points 3.2.3.1 Third Parties, Disagreement Points, and Prices 3.2.3.2 Two Buyers Scenario Under Different Remedies 3.2.3.3 Two Sellers Scenario Under Different Remedies 3.3 Uncertainty 3.3.1 Probability of an Increase in Costs 3.3.2 Magnitude of Increase 3.3.3 Bargaining Power 3.4 Unsuccessful Renegotiation 3.4.1 Expected Unsuccessful Renegotiation 3.4.2 Unexpected Unsuccessful Renegotiation 3.5 Result References Chapter 4: The Option to Cover 4.1 When Does the Option to Cover Exist? 4.1.1 Market Structure 4.1.2 Subjective Perspective 4.2 Consequences for Efficiency 4.2.1 Homogenous, Fungible, and Other Goods of Equal Kind and Value 4.2.1.1 Expectation Damages 4.2.1.2 Specific Performance 4.2.1.3 Result 4.2.2 Differentiated Goods 4.2.2.1 Expectation Damages 4.2.2.2 Specific Performance 4.2.2.3 Result 4.3 Result References Chapter 5: Over- and Undercompensation 5.1 The Shortfall of Damages 5.1.1 General Reasons for Shortfall 5.1.2 Shortfall of Damages Beyond the Money 5.1.3 Modeling the Shortfall 5.1.3.1 Deciding About Performance or Breach 5.1.3.2 Contracting Stage 5.1.4 Shortfall of Damages and Bargaining Power 5.1.4.1 Seller Has All the Bargaining Power 5.1.4.2 General Relationship Between Bargaining Power, Price, and Shortfall 5.1.5 Shortfall Due to Litigation Costs 5.1.6 Keeping Contracts 5.1.6.1 Seller Performs Based on Moral Duty 5.1.6.2 Reciprocity 5.1.7 Shortfall and Renegotiation 5.2 Overcompensatory Damages 5.3 Result References Chapter 6: Incomplete Information 6.1 Buyer Having Private Information About His Valuation 6.1.1 Effect of Seller´s Incomplete Information on Standard Model (Ex Post) 6.1.1.1 Analysis 6.1.1.2 Result and Further Questions 6.1.2 Ex Post Stage: Renegotiation 6.1.2.1 Bargaining Under Incomplete Information 6.1.2.2 Fully Compensatory Damages: Verifiable to Court Two Buyer Types Setting Specific Performance Expectation Damages Efficiency Result Two Buyer Types Setting and Costs for Offers Specific Performance Expectation Damages Efficiency Result Three Buyer Types Setting Specific Performance Expectation Damages Efficiency Result 6.1.2.3 Shortfall of Damages: Constraints of Verifiability to Court Low Type´s Valuation Below Increased Costs and High Type´s Damages Below Costs Signaling Screening Result Low Type´s Valuation Below Increased Costs and High Type´s Damages Above Increased Costs Signaling Screening Result Low Type´s and High Type´s Valuation Above Seller´s Increased Costs But Low Type´s Damages Below Seller´s Increased Costs Signaling Screening Result Average Damages Result 6.1.2.4 Result 6.1.3 Taking the Ex Ante View: Negotiation at the Contracting Stage 6.1.3.1 The Problem of Cross-Subsidization Buyer Makes a Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer First-Best Scenario Expectation Damages Specific Performance Side Payment in the Amount of the Seller´s Increased Costs Side Payment in the Amount of the High Type´s Valuation Side Payment Between the Type´s Valuation and the Seller´s Increased Costs Seller Makes a Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer First-Best Scenario Expectation Damages Specific Performance Side Payment in the Amount of the Seller´s Increased Costs Side Payment in the Amount of the High Type´s Valuation Different Side Payments for Different Buyers Result 6.1.3.2 Information Unraveling and Price Discrimination Unraveling and Full Disclosure Impediments to Disclosure Efficiency 6.1.3.3 The Specific Case of the Efficient Breach Scenario First-Best Scenario The Seller´s Costs as a Ceiling to Cross-Subsidization Buyer Makes a Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer Seller Makes a Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer Expected Ex Post Inefficiency Seller Would Always Breach Under Expectation Damages Buyer Makes a Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer Seller Makes a Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer Seller Always Performs Buyer Makes a Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer Seller Makes a Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer Result 6.1.3.4 Limited Compensation Effect of Foreseeability Doctrine on Contracting Breach Efficient Ex Post Ex Post Inefficiency Buyer Makes a Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer Seller Makes a Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer Conclusion of Contract as the Reference Point in Time Why Conclusion of the Contract Negative Side Effect Contractually Limiting Liability Default Rule: Unlimited Liability Buyer Makes Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer Seller Makes Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer Default Rule: Limited Liability Result 6.1.3.5 Result 6.2 Seller Having Private Information About Her Costs 6.2.1 Ex Post Effects of Seller´s Private Information 6.2.1.1 Specific Performance Signaling Screening Result 6.2.1.2 Seller´s Private Information and the Shortfall of Damages 6.2.2 Ex Ante Effects of Seller´s Private Information 6.2.2.1 Seller Making a Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer First-Best Scenario Expectation Damages Specific Performance 6.2.2.2 Buyer Making a Take-It-or-Leave-It Offer First-Best Scenario Expectation Damages Specific Performance 6.2.2.3 Result References Chapter 7: Transaction Costs 7.1 Renegotiation Costs 7.1.1 Scale of Renegotiation Costs 7.1.1.1 Bilateral Monopoly Bargaining and Bilateral Monopoly Renegotiating the Contract Under Specific Performance and Outside Options Contract Allows Seller to Cover Contract Excludes Possibility to Cover 7.1.1.2 Zero-Sum Game 7.1.1.3 Urgency 7.1.2 Renegotiation and Incomplete Information 7.1.3 Renegotiation and Preferences for Fairness 7.1.4 Prospect Theory and the Endowment Effect 7.1.4.1 Loss Aversion and the Endowment Effect in the Efficient Breach Scenario 7.1.4.2 Conclusion 7.2 Contracting 7.2.1 Difference in Contracting Costs 7.2.2 Inefficient Contracting Due to Flawed Estimation of Risk 7.2.2.1 Behavioral Insights on People Failing to Predict Probabilities 7.2.2.2 Seller Underestimates Risk 7.2.2.3 Buyer Underestimates Risk 7.2.2.4 Seller and Buyer, Underestimate Risk 7.2.2.5 Result 7.3 Litigation Costs 7.3.1 Relationship of Assessment and Bargaining Costs 7.3.2 Constrains for Assessing Damages 7.4 Enforcement Costs 7.5 Result References Chapter 8: Conclusion References