Additive and Traditionally Manufactured Components: A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties (Additive Manufacturing Materials and Technologies)

Cover
ADDITIVE AND
TRADITIONALLY
MANUFACTURED
COMPONENTS
A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical
Properties
Copyright
Dedication
Preface
About the author
1
What is additive manufacturing?
2
Fabrication
	Fused deposition method (FDM)
		Melt properties
		Liquefier
		Heat convection
		Pressure drop estimation
		Layer deposition and stability
		Road spreading
		Road cooling and polymer bonding
	Powder-bed fusion (PBF)
	Inkjet printing
	Stereolithography (SLA)
		The state of the resin (photopolymer)
		The maximum cure depth
		The cured line width
		Laser scan velocity
	Direct energy deposition (DED)
		Thermal model
	Laminated object manufacturing (LOM)
	References
	Further reading
3
Testing: Comparison of AM data with traditionally fabricated
	Tensile tests
		Ti-6Al-4V: AM tensile properties
		Al alloy AA6061: AM tensile properties
			Conventionally produced (AM) AA6061
		Stainless steel 304L: AM tensile properties
			Conventionally produced SS 304L
		Ceramic
			AM alumina
			Conventionally fabricated alumina
	Compression tests
		Ti-6Al-4V
		Conventionally fabricated Ti-6Al-4V
		Al alloys-Al 60613
		Conventionally fabricated Al 6061
		AM stainless steel 304L
			Conventionally fabricated stainless steel 304L
		Ceramics-Alumina
		Conventionally fabricated alumina (Al2O3)
			Effect of orientation and temperature
	Indentation (hardness)
		Ti-6Al-4V
			Conventionally produced Ti-6Al-4V
		Aluminum alloy (Al6061)
		Conventionally fabricated Al 6061
		Stainless steel 304L
			Conventionally produced 304L stainless steel
		Alumina
		Conventionally produced alumina
			Temperature dependence
			Hardness of coatings
			Hardness of alumina films
	References
	Further reading
4
Dislocations in AM and traditional manufacturing: A comparison
	Introduction
		In AM Ti-6Al-4V
		In traditionally fabricated Ti-6Al-4V
		Motion of dislocations
	Introduction AA6061
		AM of AA6061 Al alloy
		Dislocations in conventionally produced Al AA6061
			Pinning of dislocations in 6061
			The strain effect in 6061
	In stainless steel 304L
		Introduction
		In AM 304L stainless steel
		In conventionally fabricated 304L stainless steel
	In alumina (Al2O3)
		In conventionally fabricated alumina
	References
	Further reading
5
Deformation in AM and traditional manufacturing: A comparison
	Introduction
		Deformation in AM Ti-6Al-4V
		In traditionally fabricated Ti-6Al-4V
			Tensile deformation
			Compressive deformation
	Deformation in AM Al AA6061
		Tensile deformation in Al AA6061
		Compressive deformation
		Conventional tensile deformation
		Conventional compressive deformation
	AM stainless steel 304L
		Tensile deformation
		Compression deformation
		Conventionally produced SS 304L
			Tensile deformation in conventionally produced SS 304L
			Compressive deformation in conventionally produced SS 304L
	Deformation in alumina
		Compressive deformation of AM alumina
		Hardness
	References
	Further reading
6
Dynamic deformation
	Introduction
	Dynamic deformation of AM Ti-6Al-4V
		Tensile test of AM Ti-6Al-4V
		Tensile test of CP Ti-6Al-4V
	Compression tests
		In AM Ti-6Al-4V
		In CP Ti-6Al-4V
		Twinning in Ti-6Al-4V
	Dynamic deformation in Al AA6061
		Tension test in AM AlSi10Mg
		Compression test in AM Al Si10Mg
		Tensile test in CP AA6061
		Compression test in CP Al 6061
		Tensile test in AM SS 304L
		Compression test in AM SS 304L
		Tensile test in CP 304L SS
		Compression test in CP 304L SS
	Dynamic deformation in alumina (Al2O3)
		Tension test in AM alumina
		Compression test in AM alumina
		Hardness in AM alumina
		Tensile test in CP alumina (Al2O3)
		Compression test in CP alumina (Al2O3)
	References
	Further reading
7
Time-dependent deformation creep in AM and traditional manufacturing
	Introduction
	Tensile creep in AM Ti6Al4V
	Compressive creep in AM Ti6Al4V
	Tensile creep in CP Ti6Al4V
	Compressive creep in CP Ti6Al4V
	Tensile creep in AM Al10SiMg
	Tensile creep in CP Al AA6061
	Compressive creep in CP Al AA6061
	References
	Further reading
8
Cyclic deformation (fatigue) in AM and traditional manufacturing: A comparison
	Introduction to fatigue
	Fatigue in AM Ti6Al4V
		High cycle fatigue
		Low cycle fatigue
		Rough surface and notch effect
	Fatigue in conventionally fabricated Ti6Al4V
		High cycle fatigue
		Low cycle fatigue
		Rough surface and notch effect
	Fatigue in conventionally fabricated Al AA6061
		High cycle fatigue in Al 6061
		Low cycle fatigue
	The Massing hypothesis
		Rough surface and notch effect
	Fatigue in AM SS 304L
		Hgh cycle fatigue
		Fatigue in CP SS 304L
			High cycle fatigue
	References
	Further Reading
9
Fracture in AM and traditional manufactured components
	Fracture in AM Ti-6Al-4V
	Fracture in AM Al AA6061
	Fracture in AM SS 316L
	Fracture in AM alumina
	Fracture in CP Ti-6Al-4V
	Fracture in CP Al AA6061
	Fracture in CP SS 304L
		Strain rate effects in CP SS 304L
		Hydrogen effects in CP SS 304L-Hydrogen embrittlement
			Introduction
	Fracture in CP alumina
	References
	Further reading
10
Comparison of deformation in AM and CP nanomaterials
	Tensile properties
		AM Ti6Al4V
		CP Ti6Al4V
		AM of nano-316L SS
		CP nano-316L SS
			CP nano-316L and 304L SS
			CP nano-304L SS
	Compressive properties
		AM of nano-alumina
		CP of nano-alumina
	Indentation hardness in nanomaterials
		Introduction
		Hardness in AM nano-alumina
		Hardness in CP nano-alumina
	References
	Further reading
Epilogue
Index
	A
	B
	C
	D
	E
	F
	G
	H
	I
	L
	M
	N
	P
	S
	T
	V
Back Cover