Sustainable Results in Development

Foreword
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations and acronyms
Executive summary
Overview: Using the SDGs as a shared framework for results
	SDG indicator adoption at global level: Opportunities and state of play
		Opportunities increase with the strengthening of the SDG indicator framework
		Partner countries are using the SDGs in their national strategies
		Increasingly, providers are also aligning their results frameworks to the SDGs
	Key issues
		Selecting SDG indicators at global and country level
		Managing different planning cycles at country level
		Measuring SDG indicators
		Mainstreaming leaving no one behind in SDG alignment and measurement
		Next phase (2019-20)
	References
	Notes
1 SDG 4.1.1: Education proficiency
	Introduction
		Recommendations
	SDG Indicator 4.1.1 – Global profile
		Global SDG measurement and reporting
		Alignment of the corporate results frameworks of development co-operation providers to SDG 4.1.1
	Country-level analysis: Alignment, measurement and use by partners and providers
		Alignment to SDG 4.1.1 in Ethiopia and Myanmar
			Country alignment to SDG 4.1.1 is still weak in both countries
			Development co-operation providers have yet to align their country results frameworks to SDG 4.1.1
		Measurement and use of SDG 4.1.1 data in Ethiopia and Myanmar
			Measurement of learning outcomes in both countries has yet to be aligned with international standards
			In Ethiopia, country-specific measurement of learning outcomes is well established, but the coverage and use of the resulting data could be boosted
			Facilitated by well co-ordinated provider support, Myanmar’s current reforms aim to address gaps in availability and use of results data – and to align to the SDG indicator in the medium term
			Visualising the results chain for 4.1.1 in Ethiopia and Myanmar
	Conclusions
	References
		Annex 1.A. Country profiles for SDG 4: Education proficiency
		Indicator tables for SDG 4: Education proficiency
		Ethiopia
		Myanmar
	Notes
2 SDG 6.2.1: Sanitation and hygiene
	Introduction
		Recommendations
	SDG Indicator 6.2.1 – Global profile
		Global SDG measurement and reporting
		Alignment of the corporate results frameworks of development co-operation providers to SDG 6.2.1
	Country-level analysis: Alignment, measurement and use by partners and providers
		Alignment to SDG 6.2.1 in Kenya and Myanmar
			The national plans of Kenya and Myanmar are aligned to SDG 6.2.1a, targeting universal access to basic sanitation by 2030
			In both Kenya and Myanmar, sanitation and hygiene policies and provision are fragmented, which creates challenges for SDG alignment
			Development partner indicators are still based on the MDG ladder definitions, and do not capture all the relevant elements included in the SDG indicator
		Measurement and use of sanitation data in Kenya and Myanmar
			Kenya would benefit from nationally integrated systems for collation and use of sanitation data
			Monitoring data for sanitation in Myanmar is in the early stages, but alignment to SDG 6.2.1 creates impetus for progress
			Both countries face challenges to ensure that data collection can capture the local context, while also meeting international reporting requirements
			Visualising the results chain for sanitation access in Kenya and Myanmar
	Conclusions and recommendations
	References
		Annex 2.A. Country profiles for SDG 6: Sanitation and hygiene
		Annex 2.B. Indicator tables for SDG 6: Sanitation and hygiene
		Kenya
		Myanmar
	Notes
3 SDG 7.1.1: Access to electricity
	Introduction
		Recommendations
	SDG Indicator 7.1.1 – Global profile
		Global SDG measurement and reporting
		Alignment of the corporate results frameworks of development co-operation providers to SDG 7.1.1
	Country-level analysis: Alignment, measurement and use by partners and providers
		Alignment to SDG 7.1.1 in Ethiopia and Kenya
			At country level, alignment to SDG 7.1.1 through national and sector plans varies
			Development co-operation providers engaged in electricity access utilise a range of indicators
		Measurement and use of electricity access data in Ethiopia and Kenya
			In both countries, measurement of access to electricity is fragmented with use of both survey and administrative data
			Monitoring off-grid connections poses specific challenges
			The Multi-Tier Framework Survey, which provides more nuanced data on electricity access, has been administered in both Ethiopia and Kenya
			Measurement by providers tends to be project driven
			Data disaggregation needs further support
			Visualising the results chain for energy access in Ethiopia and Kenya: Data against most of the indicators are missing
	Conclusions
	References
		Annex 3.A. Country profiles for SDG 7: Access to electricity
		Indicator tables for SDG 7: Access to electricity
		Kenya
		Ethiopia
	Notes
		Annex A. Background and methodology for the project
		Background
		Purpose and objectives of the project
		Approach
			Case study topics
			Project methodology
			Outputs, milestones and timeframes
			Key outputs:
		References
		Notes