دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش:
نویسندگان: Mayuko Nakamaru
سری: Theoretical Biology
ISBN (شابک) : 9811949786, 9789811949784
ناشر: Springer
سال نشر: 2023
تعداد صفحات: 330
[331]
زبان: English
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود)
حجم فایل: 9 Mb
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Trust and Credit in Organizations and Institutions: As Viewed from the Evolution of Cooperation به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب اعتماد و اعتبار در سازمان ها و مؤسسات: همانطور که از تکامل همکاری مشاهده می شود نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
این کتاب نشان میدهد که نظریه بازیهای تکاملی میتواند
چگونگی ظهور همکاری متقابل، اعتماد و اعتبار در یک گروه را در
سازمانها و مؤسسات آشکار کند. برخی از سازمانها و مؤسسات مانند
اتحادیههای بیمه، اتحادیههای اعتباری و بانکها از گروههای
کمکهای متقابل بسیار ساده سرچشمه میگیرند. اعضای این گروههای
کمکهای متقابل در مراحل اولیه به یکدیگر کمک میکنند، قوانینی را
برای ارتقای همکاری وضع میکنند و سواران آزاد را سرکوب میکنند.
سپس، نه تنها به یکدیگر، بلکه به گروهی که به آن تعلق دارند،
اعتماد می کنند.
تقسیم کار زمانی اتفاق میافتد که جامعه در یک گروه بزرگتر دارای
تنوع و پیچیدگی باشد و همچنین تقسیم کار مستلزم همکاری و اعتماد
متقابل بین نقشهای مختلف اجتماعی است. در یک گروه بزرگتر، افراد
نمیتوانند مستقیماً با یکدیگر تعامل داشته باشند، و شهرت افراد
ناشناس به دیگران کمک میکند تا تصمیم بگیرند که چه کسی قابل
اعتماد است. با این حال، اگر شایعات نادرست را در مورد یک شهرت
منتشر کنند، اعتماد و همکاری از بین می رود. بنابراین نحوه سرکوب
شایعات نادرست نیز برای اعتماد و همکاری در یک گروه بزرگتر مهم
است. اگر بتوان اعتماد و اعتبار ایجاد کرد، این گروه ها با موفقیت
پایدار خواهند بود. برخی توسعه یافته و تکامل می یابند و سپس به
سازمان ها و مؤسسات بزرگتر بالغ می شوند. بالاخره این سازمان ها و
نهادها به چیزی تبدیل می شوند که الان هستند. بنابراین، نه تنها
همکاری، بلکه اعتماد و اعتبار نیز کلیدهای درک این سازمان ها و
مؤسسات است.
تکامل همکاری، موضوع تحقیق در بوم شناسی تکاملی و نظریه بازی های
تکاملی، می تواند برای درک چگونگی ایجاد نهادها و سازمان ها به
کار رود. پایدار، قابل اعتماد و معتبر. این ایده به ما ارائه می
دهد که نظریه بازی های تکاملی ابزار ریاضی خوبی برای تجزیه و
تحلیل اعتماد و اعتبار است. این نوع تحقیقات را می توان در
موضوعات داغ فعلی مانند تامین مالی خرد و استفاده پایدار از
اکوسیستم ها به کار برد.
This book shows that evolutionary game theory can unravel
how mutual cooperation, trust, and credit in a group emerge in
organizations and institutions. Some organizations and
institutions, such as insurance unions, credit unions, and
banks, originated from very simple mutual-aid groups. Members
in these early-stage mutual-aid groups help each other, making
rules to promote cooperation, and suppressing free riders.
Then, they come to “trust” not only each other but also the
group they belong to, itself.
The division of labor occurs when the society comes to have
diversity and complexity in a larger group, and the division of
labor also requires mutual cooperation and trust among
different social roles. In a larger group, people cannot
directly interact with each other, and the reputation of
unknown people helps other decide who is a trustworthy person.
However, if gossip spreads untruths about a reputation, trust
and cooperation are destroyed. Therefore, how to suppress
untrue gossip is also important for trust and cooperation in a
larger group. If trustworthiness and credibility can be
established, these groups are successfully sustainable. Some
develop and evolve and then mature into larger organizations
and institutions. Finally, these organizations and institutions
become what they are now. Therefore, not only cooperation but
also trust and credit are keys to understanding these
organizations and institutions.
The evolution of cooperation, a topic of research in
evolutionary ecology and evolutionary game theory, can be
applied to understanding how to make institutions and
organizations sustainable, trustworthy, and credible. It
provides us with the idea that evolutionary game theory is a
good mathematical tool to analyze trust and credit. This kind
of research can be applied to current hot topics such as
microfinance and the sustainable use of
ecosystems.
Preface Abilities Unique to Humans Why Animals Live in Groups Groups of Human Beings Organizations and Institutions Trust in Organizations and Institutions Chapters Acknowledgments Contents Part I: Introduction to the Evolution of Cooperation Chapter 1: What Is ``The Evolution of Cooperation``? 1.1 Cooperation in Our Lives 1.2 What Is Evolutionary Game Theory? 1.3 Evolutionary Stable Strategy 1.4 Games Between Two Players 1.4.1 Prisoner´s Dilemma Game 1.4.2 Chicken Game 1.4.3 Snowdrift and Blizzard Game 1.4.4 Which Is an ESS, Cooperation or Defection? 1.5 Why We Can Analyze Our Society by Means of Evolutionary Game Theory 1.6 How to Make a Mathematical Model or an Agent-Based Model of Our Society by Means of Evolutionary Game Theory 1.7 The Mechanisms to Promote the Evolution of Cooperation Between Bilateral Players 1.7.1 Kin Selection 1.7.2 Group Selection 1.7.3 Direct Reciprocity 1.7.4 Indirect Reciprocity 1.7.5 Social Network 1.7.6 Punishment 1.8 Games Among Three or More Players 1.9 The Application of Evolutionary Game Theory to Our Society References Chapter 2: The Evolution of Cooperation in a Lattice-Structured Population Under Two Different Updating Rules 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Completely Mixed Population 2.3 One-Dimensional Lattice Under the Score-Dependent Viability Model 2.3.1 Computer Simulations on a One-Dimensional Lattice Model 2.3.2 The Dynamics of Density 2.3.2.1 Mean-Field Approximation 2.3.2.2 Pair Approximation 2.3.3 Invasion Success Probability in the One-Dimensional Lattice Model 2.3.4 The Pair-Edge Method 2.4 Two-Dimensional Lattice Under the Viability Model 2.4.1 Mean-Field Approximation in the Two-Dimensional Lattice 2.4.2 Pair Approximation in the Two-Dimensional Lattice Model 2.4.3 Computer Simulations 2.5 Score-Dependent Fertility Model 2.5.1 Computer Simulations on a One-Dimensional Lattice 2.5.2 Mathematical Analyses in a One-Dimensional Lattice 2.5.2.1 Mean-Field Dynamics 2.5.2.2 Pair Approximation 2.5.2.3 Invasion Success Probability 2.5.2.4 The Pair-Edge Method 2.5.3 Two-Dimensional Model 2.6 Discussion and Conclusion 2.6.1 The Lattice-Structured Population vs. Completely Mixing Population 2.6.2 Comparison Between the Viability Model and the Fertility Model 2.6.3 Coexistence of Cooperators and Defectors References Chapter 3: The Effect of Peer Punishment on the Evolution of Cooperation 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Two Updating Rules, Viability Model and Fertility Model 3.2.1 Model 3.2.2 The Completely Mixing Model 3.2.2.1 Score-Dependent Viability Model 3.2.2.2 Score-Dependent Fertility Model 3.2.3 The Lattice Model 3.2.3.1 Score-Dependent Viability Model 3.2.3.2 Score-Dependent Fertility Model 3.2.4 Summary 3.2.5 Expansion of This Study: Do Empty Sites Influence the Evolution of Cooperation and Punishment? 3.2.5.1 Model and Results 3.3 If Anti-Social Punishers Exist in the Population 3.3.1 Strategies and Payoffs 3.3.2 Z-Mixed Population Model 3.3.3 Lattice Model When Anti-Social Punishment Is Allowed 3.4 Which Promotes the Evolution of Cooperation, Strict or Graduated Punishment? 3.4.1 What Is Graduated or Strict Punishment? 3.4.2 Models 3.4.3 Results 3.4.3.1 Agent-Based Simulations 3.4.3.2 The Mathematical Model of the Random-Matching Condition 3.5 Discussion and Conclusions 3.5.1 Spiteful Behavior in Social Sciences and Evolutionary Evolution 3.5.2 Graduated or Strict Punishment in Society 3.5.3 Anti-Social Punishment in Society 3.5.4 Other Types of Punishment Beside Peer Punishment References Part II: Cooperation, Trust, and Credit in the Early-Stage Mutual-Aid Systems Chapter 4: Rotation Savings and Credit Associations (ROSCAs) as Early-Stage Credit Systems 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Models and Results 4.2.1 Model 1: Baseline Evolutionary Simulation Model of Rotating Indivisible Goods Game 4.2.2 Results of Model 1 4.2.3 Model 2: Rotating Indivisible Goods Game with the Peer Selection Rule 4.2.4 Results of Model 2 4.2.5 Model 3: A Forfeiture Rule Is Introduced 4.2.6 Results of Model 3 4.2.7 Effect of Labeling Rules 4.2.8 Effect of Reputation Levels 4.3 Discussion and Conclusions References Chapter 5: Tanomoshi-ko Field Study and Subjective Experiment 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Ko on Sado Island 5.2.1 Tanomoshi-ko in Fukura-District 5.2.2 Tanomoshi-ko in Ogi-District 5.2.3 Nenbutsu-ko 5.2.4 Michibushin 5.2.5 Summary: Ko in Sado 5.3 Experimental Study of ROSCA 5.3.1 Experiment 5.3.1.1 Design 5.3.1.2 Treatment B (Base) 5.3.1.3 Treatment P (Punishment) 5.3.1.4 Treatments V (Voting) and VP (Voting With Punishment) 5.3.2 Theoretical Predictions 5.3.3 Results 5.3.3.1 Average Contribution Rates Over Time and Distribution of Total Profit 5.3.3.2 Why Did the Voting System Work Well? 5.3.3.3 Why Did the Punishment Rule Not Work Well? 5.3.3.4 Order Effect for the Receipt of Payouts 5.3.3.5 Panel Regression of Average Contribution Rates 5.3.4 Conclusions of the Experiment References Chapter 6: Who Does a Group Admit into Membership or Which Group Does a Player Want to Join? 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Models 6.3 Results 6.4 Discussion and Conclusions References Chapter 7: The Mutual-Aid Game as an Early-Stage Insurance System 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Model 7.3 Results 7.3.1 Eight Strategy Sets Are Categorized into Two 7.3.2 Calculating the Expected Payoffs 7.3.3 What Happens When S-J Players Are the Majority? 7.3.4 Can Rare S-J Players Invade the Population Occupied by AllD Players? 7.3.5 The Effect of Large Group Size 7.3.6 Reputation vs. Experience 7.3.7 Why Cannot Conditional Cooperators Except S-J Players Invade the Population in n 4? 7.3.8 Perception and Implementation Errors 7.3.9 If Pure Cooperators Are Added in the Population 7.4 Discussion and Conclusions 7.4.1 Comparison with the Previous Studies About the Mutual-Aid Game 7.4.2 The Mutual-Aid Game as an Institution References Part III: Cooperation, Trust, and Credibility in Society Chapter 8: Cooperation and Punishment in the Linear Division of Labor 8.1 Introduction 8.1.1 The Linear Division of Labor 8.1.2 The Industrial Waste Treatment Process in Japan 8.2 Models 8.2.1 Baseline System in the Three-Role Model 8.2.2 Actor Responsibility System in the Three-Role Model 8.2.3 Producer Responsibility System in the Three-Role Model 8.3 Results 8.3.1 Comparison with the Results of Kitakaji and Ohnuma (2014) 8.3.2 Comparison with Empirical Reality 8.3.3 Comparison Between the Three-Role and Two-Role Models 8.4 Discussion and Conclusions References Chapter 9: Can Cooperation Evolve When False Gossip Spreads? 9.1 Introduction 9.1.1 Comparison with Previous Studies About Indirect Reciprocity 9.1.2 Comparison with Nakamaru and Kawata´s Gossip Model 9.1.3 Unification of Direct and Indirect Reciprocity 9.2 Models 9.2.1 Strategies 9.2.2 Definition of the P-Score 9.2.3 The Giving-Game Session 9.2.4 The Gossip Session 9.2.5 The Updating Rule Through Generations 9.2.6 Parameter Settings 9.3 Competition Among Gossiping Reciprocators with Various Criteria 9.3.1 Fair Gossipers with Various Criteria for Giving-Games (qG = qB = 0) 9.3.2 Biased Gossipers (qG = qB = k) 9.4 Effects of Different Types of False Gossip on the Evolution of Reciprocity 9.4.1 ZDISCs Versus Non-gossiping ALLDs 9.4.2 ZDISCs Versus Fairly Gossiping ALLDs 9.4.3 ZDISCs Versus Pure Self-Advertising ALLDs 9.4.4 ZDISCs Versus ALLB-ALLDs 9.4.5 ZDISCs Versus ALLG-ALLDs 9.5 Effects of Selecting Gossip Based on the Trustworthiness of Speakers 9.5.1 ZDISCs Versus Fairly Gossiping ALLDs 9.5.2 ZDISCs Versus Pure Self-Advertising ALLDs 9.5.3 ZDISCs Versus ALLB-ALLDs 9.5.4 ZDISCs Versus ALLG-ALLDs 9.6 Discussion and Conclusions References Part IV: Ecological Sustainability, Institutions, and Cooperation Chapter 10: Field Abandonment Problem in Rice Paddy Fields 10.1 Introduction 10.2 Models 10.2.1 Baseline Assumption in a Well-Mixed Population 10.2.2 Consideration of Spatial Structure 10.3 Results 10.3.1 Simulations for a Well-Mixed Population 10.3.2 Simulations for a Spatially Structured Population 10.3.2.1 Comparison Between Population Applying (*, Global, *) and (*, Local, *) Schemes 10.3.2.2 The Effect of Various (*, Local, *) Schemes 10.3.2.3 Parameter Regarding Cultivation Effort in the (*, Local, *) Schemes: a, b, and cclt 10.3.2.4 Parameter Regarding Collective Action in the (*, Local, *) Schemes 10.3.2.5 Parameters Regarding Two Side Effects of Cultivation Effort in the (*, Local, *) Schemes Water-Use Competition, β3 Land Abandonment, β1 10.4 Discussion and Conclusions 10.4.1 Summary of the Results 10.4.2 Method of Validating the Model Results 10.4.3 Game Structure and Its Effect on the Dynamics 10.4.4 Application of the Current Model and Future Research 10.4.5 Implications References Chapter 11: Ecological Features Benefiting Sustainable Harvesters in Socio-Ecological Systems: A Case Study of Swiftlets in Ma... 11.1 Introduction 11.1.1 An Appropriate Example: Swiftlets´ Nests in Sarawak, Malaysia 11.1.2 Comparison with the Previous Theoretical Studies About the Social and Ecological Dynamics 11.1.3 The Findings of This Chapter 11.2 Models and Results 11.2.1 Model 1: The Baseline Model 11.2.2 Result 1: The Population Dynamics of Swiftlets in the Habitat Without Harvesters 11.2.3 Model 2: The Open-Access Model 11.2.4 Result 2: The Results of the Open-Access Model 11.2.5 Model 3: The Property Rights Model 11.2.6 Result 3: Results of the Property Rights Model 11.3 Discussion and Conclusions 11.3.1 Application of Our Model 11.3.2 One Direction of Our Future Work 11.3.3 The Effect of the Price of a Nest 11.3.4 Back to the Reality About Swiftlets 11.3.5 Comparison with Theoretical Studies About Socio-Ecological Dynamics References Epilogue Searching for tanomoshi-ko in Micronesia The World´s First Credit System Was Established in Japan Revival of Mutual-Aid Organizations in Japan? References