دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش: [3 ed.]
نویسندگان: James Underwood
سری: Aspen Casebook Series
ناشر: Aspen Publishing
سال نشر: 2022
تعداد صفحات: 1536
[1537]
زبان: English
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود)
حجم فایل: 13 Mb
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Tort Law: Principles in Practice: Principles in Practice به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب قانون جرم: اصول در عمل: اصول در عمل نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
قانون شکنجه: اصول در عمل کتاب موردی قابل دسترسی و جذاب است که دارای ویژگیهای آموزشی و ابزارهای متنوعی برای بررسی دکترین و قوانین قانون شکنجه و کاربرد آنها در عمل است. متن مقدماتی برای هر فصل، زیربخش و موارد، موضوعات مورد بحث را چارچوب میدهد و به درک دانشآموز کمک میکند. ویژگی های کلیدی: جعبههای متن و عکسها، نمونه دستورالعملهای هیئت داوران، چکلیستها و سؤالات پایان فصل. اهداف فصل در ابتدای هر فصل فهرست شده است تا زمینه های کلیدی پوشش را برجسته کرده و هنگام مرور مطالب، یک چک لیست برای دانش آموزان ارائه شود. موارد کلیدی جدید (به عنوان مثال، پرونده های جدید که به علت "اما برای" و پوشش لبه دفاع از کمربند ایمنی می پردازند که روند اخیر به سمت پذیرش این دفاع را نشان می دهد). بعد از اکثر موارد مشکلات تمرین کوتاه را گسترش داد.
Tort Law: Principles in Practice is an approachable and engaging casebook, with a variety of pedagogical features and tools to examine tort law doctrine and rules and their application in practice. Introductory text for each chapter, subsection, and cases frame the issues under discussion, aiding student comprehension. Key Features: Text boxes and photographs, sample pattern jury instructions, checklists, and end-of-chapter essay questions. Chapter Goals are listed at the beginning of each chapter to highlight the key areas of coverage and provide a checklist for students when reviewing material. New key cases (e.g., new cases dealing with “but-for” causation and cutting edge coverage of the seat-belt defense showing a recent trend toward acceptance of this defense). Expanded short practice problems after most cases.
Front Matter Editorial Advisors Title Page Copyright Page About Aspen Publishing Dedication Page Summary of Contents Contents Preface Acknowledgments 1 INTRODUCTION TO TORTS I. Torts Defined II. Goals and Criticisms A. What Are the Purposes Behind Tort Law? B. Has Tort Law Gotten Out of Control? Rule 11 and Tort Reform: Myth, Reality, and Legislation III. Case Procedure and Definitions A. Pleadings and Attacks on Pleadings B. Formal Discovery C. Motions for Summary Judgment D. Trial E. Entry of Judgment F. Appeal IV. Case Briefing A. Reasons for Briefing a Case B. Preparation of a Case Brief 1. Facts 2. Procedural History 3. Issue 4. Rule 5. Analysis 6. Holding 2 INTENTIONAL TORTS I. Overview II. Battery A. Introduction B. Intent Garratt v. Dailey Waters v. Blackshear C. Offensive, Indirect, and Intangible Contacts Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel, Inc. Richardson v. Hennly Eichenwald v. Rivello D. Scope of Liability for Battery Nelson v. Carroll E. The Single vs. Dual Intent Debate White v. Muniz III. Assault A. Introduction B. The Elements 1. Intent Cullison v. Medley 2. Reasonable Apprehension Bouton v. Allstate Ins. Co. 3. Imminent Apprehension Brower v. Ackerly C. Transfer of Intent Hall v. McBryde IV. False Imprisonment A. Introduction B. The Elements 1. Intent to Detain William Whirl v. C.V. (Buster) Kern 2. Detention Smith v. Comair, Inc. C. Shopkeeper?s Privilege Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Resendez V. Trespass A. Introduction B. Land 1. Intent Thomas v. Harrah?s Vicksburg Corp. 2. Scope of Liability Baker v. Shymkiv C. Personal Property 1. Trespass to Chattels Koepnick v. Sears Roebuck & Co. 2. Conversion Pearson v. Dodd VI. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress A. Outrageous Conduct Intending Emotional Distress Zalnis v. Thoroughbred Datsun Car Co. Strauss v. Cilek B. Severe Emotional Distress Miller v. Willbanks, M.D. Jones v. Clinton C. Constitutional Protection of Outrageous Speech Snyder v. Phelps 3 DEFENSES TO INTENTIONAL TORTS I. Introduction II. Consent A. Standard and Effect McQuiggan v. Boy Scouts of America B. Limitations on Consent 1. Exceeding the Scope Koffman v. Garnett 2. Fraud Hogan v. Tavzel McPherson v. McPherson III. Defense of Self, Others, and Property A. Self-Defense Slayton v. McDonald B. Defense of Others Young v. Warren C. Defense of Property Woodard v. Turnipseed Katko v. Briney 4 NEGLIGENCE: BREACH OF DUTY OF REASONABLE CARE I. Introduction II. The Duty of Reasonable Care A. The Objective Standard Vaughan v. Menlove B. Actual and Constructive Knowledge; Hindsight Parrot v. Wells, Fargo & Co. III. The Reasonable Person Under the Circumstances A. Extraordinary Knowledge and Skill Cervelli v. Graves B. Physical Disability Poyner v. Loftus C. Mental Disability Creasy v. Rusk D. Children Robinson v. Lindsay E. Extraordinarily Dangerous Activities Stewart v. Motts F. Sudden Emergency Myhaver v. Knutson IV. Proving Breach of Duty A. The Learned Hand Formula Davis v. Consolidated Rail Corp. B. Negligence Per Se?Violation of Statutes 1. Origins and Rationale Martin v. Herzog 2. Type of Harm and Membership in Protected Class Wawanesa Mutual Ins. v. Matlock 3. Excuse Sikora v. Wenzel C. Custom 1. Industry Custom The T.J. Hooper 2. Personal Custom Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Wright D. Res Ipsa Loquitur Byrne v. Boadle Krebs v. Corrigan V. Recklessness as an Alternative Standard Mobil v. Ellender 5 CAUSATION I. Introduction II. Actual Cause A. The ?But-For? Test Cay v. Louisiana Lyons v. Midnight Sun Transportation Services East Texas Theatres, Inc. v. Rutledge B. Alternatives to But-For Causation 1. Multiple Sufficient Independent Causes Kingston v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway 2. Alternative Liability Summers v. Tice Burke v. Schaffner 3. Modified Alternative Liability: Market Share Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories 4. Increased Risk of Future Harm Temple-Inland Products Corp. v. Carter 5. Loss of Chance Lord v. Lovett III. Proximate Cause A. Introduction Palsgraf v. Long Island Railway Co. B. The Direct Cause Test In re Polemis Laureano v. Louzoun C. The Foreseeability Test 1. Whether the Type of Accident Was Within the Scope of the Risk Tieder v. Little 2. Breach of Duty Does Not Necessarily Prove Proximate Cause Crankshaw v. Piedmont Driving Club D. The Substantial Factor Test 1. Introduction to the Substantial Factor Test Brisboy v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. 2. Substantial Factor as a Test for Proximate Cause American Truck Leasing, Inc. v. Thorne Equipment Co. E. Superseding vs. Intervening Causes Price v. Blaine Kern Artista, Inc. McCane-Sondock Protection Systems v. Emmittee 6 SPECIAL DUTY RULES I. Introduction II. Duty to Act A. Acts vs. Omissions 1. No General Duty to Aid Others Yania v. Bigan 2. When Acting, the Duty of Care Exists United States v. Lawter 3. Special Relationships Compelling Action Lundy v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc. 4. Duty Ends at Expiration of Special Relationship Boyette v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. B. Rescuers 1. The Rescue Doctrine McCoy v. American Suzuki Motor Corp. 2. The Firefighter Rule Moody v. Delta Western Snellenberger v. Rodriguez III. Duty to Protect Third Parties from Another?s Harm A. Health Care Workers Emerich v. Philadelphia Center for Human Development Bradshaw v. Daniel, M.D. B. Employer-Employee Relationships Otis Engineering Corp. v. Clark IV. Duty Limited by the Nature of the Primary Harm A. Emotional Distress 1. From Impact Rule to Zone of Danger Robb v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Co. 2. From Zone of Danger to Dillon Rule of Foreseeability Dillon v. Legg Grotts v. Zahner 3. Is There a General Duty Not to Cause Emotional Distress? Boyles v. Kerr B. ?Mere? Economic Harm 532 Madison Avenue Gourmet Foods v. Finlandia Center, Inc. C. Wrongful Pregnancy, Wrongful Life, and Wrongful Birth 1. Wrongful Pregnancy Johnson v. University Hospitals of Cleveland 2. Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Nelson v. Krusen V. Duty Limited by Nature of the Activity: Primary Assumption of the Risk A. Introduction B. Inherent Risk Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co., Inc. C. A More Refined Test for Inherent Risks Clover v. Snowbird Ski Resort VI. Duty Based Upon Victim?s Status A. Introduction B. Trespassers 1. Adult Trespassers Ryals v. United States Steel Corp. 2. Child Trespassers: The Attractive Nuisance Doctrine Bennett v. Stanley C. Licensees Knorpp v. Hale D. Invitees 1. Time as a Trigger of Duty Richardson v. The Commodore Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Gonzalez 2. Open and Obvious Dangers O?Sullivan v. Shaw 3. Duty to Protect Invitees from Criminal Attack a. Actual Awareness of Danger Gould v. Taco Bell b. Foreseeable Risk of Danger Delta Tau Delta v. Johnson E. Modern Rejection of Three Categories Nelson v. Freeland VII. Duty Based Upon Defendant?s Status: Professionals A. The Professional Standard of Care 1. Professional Custom Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood Bank Hodges v. Carter 2. Who Is a Professional? Rossell v. Volkswagen of America B. Informed Consent Scott v. Bradford C. Limitations on a Professional?s Duty Barcelo, III v. Elliott 7 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES I. Introduction II. Contributory Negligence and Comparative Fault A. Contributory Negligence Butterfield v. Forrester Harris v. Meadows B. The Comparative Fault Reform 1. The Decision to Switch to Comparative Fault McIntyre v. Balentine 2. The Apportionment Problem Sandford v. Chevrolet 3. Multiple Tortfeasors in Modified Comparative Fault Beaudoin v. Texaco, Inc. III. Assumption of the Risk A. Express Assumption of the Risk 1. Public Policy Hurdle Tunkl v. Regents of the University of California 2. The Drafting Hurdle Alack v. Vic Tanny International of Missouri, Inc. B. Secondary Implied Assumption of the Risk 1. Qualified Secondary Implied Assumption of the Risk Riddle v. Universal Sport Camp 2. Unqualified Secondary Implied Assumption of the Risk Schroyer v. McNeal 3. Does Comparative Fault Abolish Secondary Implied Assumption of the Risk? Davenport v. Cotton Hope Plantation Horizontal Property Regime IV. Immunities A. Sovereign Immunity 1. The Federal Government Cestonaro v. United States 2. State and Local Governments Campbell v. Indiana B. Spousal and Parental Immunity 1. Spousal Immunity Price v. Price 2. Parental Immunity Sandoval v. Sandoval V. Statutes of Limitation and Repose A. Statutes of Limitation 1. Accrual of a Claim Crumpton v. Humana, Inc. 2. The Legal Injury Rule and the Discovery Rule Exception S.V. v. R.V. B. Statutes of Repose Kern v. St. Joseph Hospital 8 DAMAGES I. Introduction II. Actual, Compensatory Damages A. Special (Economic) Damages Martin v. United States B. General (Noneconomic) Damages 1. Review of Jury?s Award Miraglia v. H&L Holding Corp. 2. Per Diem Awards Beagle v. Vasold 3. Day in the Life Videos Donnellan v. First Student, Inc. 4. Hedonic Damages McDougald v. Garber C. Wrongful Death and Survival Claims Jordan v. Baptist Three Rivers Hospital D. Property Damages Strickland v. Medlen III. Limitations on Actual Damages A. Failure to Mitigate Damages 1. Failure to Mitigate as ?Fault? Miller v. Eichhorn 2. Failure to Mitigate as a Damage Consideration Klanseck v. Anderson Sales & Service, Inc. 3. Seat-Belt Defense Nabors Well Services v. Romero B. Collateral Source Rule Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit District C. Statutory Limits 1. Examples of Statutory Limits California Civ. Code ?333.2 Maryland Code Ann., Ct. & Jud. Proc. ?11-108 Texas Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code ?74.301 Texas Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code ?74.303 2. Constitutionality of Limits on Actual Damages Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc. Knowles v. United States IV. Nominal Damages Longenecker v. Zimmerman V. Punitive Damages A. When Civil Punishment Is Permitted 1. Malicious Conduct Shugar v. Guill 2. Corporate Liability for Reckless Conduct Mobil v. Ellender B. The Amount of Punitive Damages 1. Due Process Limits State Farm Mutual v. Campbell 2. Statutory Limits 9 APPORTIONMENT I. Introduction II. Joint and Several Liability Sitzes v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. III. Several Liability A. Rejection of Joint and Several Liability in Favor of Several Liability McIntyre v. Balentine B. Threshold Level Joint and Several Liability Statutes New Jersey Stat. ?2A:15-53 Texas Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code ?33.013 Hawaii Rev. Stat. ?663-10.9 C. Apportionment with Absent or Immune Actors Sullivan v. Scoular Grain Co. D. Negligent Enabling Turner v. Jordan, M.D. IV. Equitable Doctrines Creating Joint Liability A. Introduction B. Vicarious Liability Trahan-Laroche v. Lockheed Sanders, Inc. 1. Employees v. Independent Contractors Throop v. F.E. Young & Co. 2. Course and Scope of Employment Fruit v. Equitable Life Assurance Society C. Concert of Action 1. Conduct Creating Joint Liability Herman v. Wesgate Shinn v. Allen Kubert v. Best 2. Extent of Liability for Acting in Concert American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Grim 10 STRICT LIABILITY I. Introduction II. Unusually Dangerous Activities Exner v. Sherman Power Const. Co. III. Wild and Trespassing Animals Byram v. Main Clark v. Brings 11 PRODUCTS LIABILITY I. Introduction II. Historical Development and Adoption A. Limitations on Duty MacPherson v. Buick Motor Company B. Rejection of Fault or Contract Breach as Prerequisites to Recovery Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno C. Restatement (Second) ?402A (1965) D. Strict Liability Is for Product Sellers Amazon.com, Inc. v. McMillan III. Defects A. Manufacturing American Tobacco Co. v. Grinnell B. Design Defects 1. The Consumer Expectation Test Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. 2. The Risk Utility Test Dawson v. Chrysler Corp. 3. The Alternative Feasible Design Requirement American Tobacco Co. v. Grinnell 4. Comparing the Consumer Expectation and Risk Utility Tests Denny v. Ford Motor Co. C. Marketing Defects 1. The Duty to Warn Richter v. Limax International 2. Common Knowledge Exception American Tobacco Co. v. Grinnell IV. Defenses Arising Out of Plaintiff?s Misconduct A. Is Negligence a Defense to Strict Liability? Bowling v. Heil Co. Daly v. General Motors Corp. B. When, and How, Does Product Misuse Provide a Defense? Daniell v. Ford Motor Co. Hernandez v. Tokai Corp. 12 DEFAMATION I. Introduction II. Elements of Claim A. False and Defamatory Statements 1. Early Application Burton v. Crowell Pub. Co. 2. Modern Application Busch v. Viacom International Henderson v. Henderson B. Libel vs. Slander Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc. III. Privileges A. Common Law Johnson v. Queenan Lester v. Powers Florida Stat. ?768.095 Louisiana Rev. Stat. ?14.50 Texas Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code ?73.002 Texas Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code ?73.004 Federal Communications Decency Act 47 U.S.C.A. ?230(c) Wisconsin Stat. Ann. ?895.05 B. Constitutional Privilege 1. Speech About Public Officials, Public Figures, and Public Matters Khawar v. Globe International, Inc. 2. Private Matters Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. 13 BUSINESS TORTS I. Introduction II. Fraud A. Misrepresentations 1. Existing Facts or Opinions Based Upon Facts Trenholm v. Ratcliff 2. Affirmative Acts of Concealment Lindberg Cadillac Co. v. Aron 3. Promissory Fraud Smehlik v. Athletes and Artists, Inc. B. Justifiable Reliance Judd v. Walker III. Negligent Misrepresentation A. Introduction Staggs v. Sells B. Duty Revisited Bily v. Arthur Young & Co. IV. Tortious Interference with Contract A. Rejection of Negligent Interference State of Louisiana v. M/V Testbank B. Intentional Interference with Contract Lumley v. Gye C. Interference with Prospective Contractual Relations Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Sturges, III V. Distinguishing Tort vs. Contract Claims Southwestern Bell Telephone v. DeLanney Table of Cases Index