Thomas Seebohm on the Foundations of the Sciences: An Analysis and Critical Appraisal (Contributions to Phenomenology, 105)

Preface\nIntroduction\n	References\nContents\nChapter 1: On Thomas Seebohm’s History as a Science and the System of the Sciences\n	References\nChapter 2: Seebohm and Husserl on the Humanities\n	References\nChapter 3: History, the Sciences, and Disinterested Observers: A Dialogue Between Alfred Schutz and Thomas Seebohm\n	3.1 Seebohm on the History and the Cultural/Natural Science Divide\n	3.2 A Response to Seebohm’s Overcoming of the Natural Science/Cultural Science Divide\n	3.3 Seebohm on Disinterested Observers\n	3.4 A Response to Seebohm on Disinterested Observers\n	3.5 Schutz and Seebohm\n	References\nChapter 4: Seebohm’s Hermeneutics\n	4.1 Introduction\n	4.2 Seebohm’s Hermeneutics in Relation to “Philosophical Hermeneutics”\n		4.2.1 Their Agreements and Disagreements\n		4.2.2 Their Disagreement About the First Canon\n		4.2.3 Why Their Hermeneutics Differ\n	References\nChapter 5: The Tasks and Contexts of Understanding in Dilthey and Seebohm\n	5.1 The Relation Between Explanation and Understanding\n	5.2 Levels of Understanding\n	5.3 What Kind of Foundation Can the Sciences Offer?\n	5.4 Concluding Observations\n	References\nChapter 6: Phenomenological Reduction and Methodological Abstraction\n	6.1 Methodological Abstractions in the Broad Sense\n	6.2 Abstraction in the Egologic and Primordial Reductions\n	6.3 The Abstract Foundation of Consciousness\n	6.4 Methodological Abstraction in the Narrower Sense\n	6.5 Epistemic and Ontic Interpretations\n	6.6 Ontological Themes\n	6.7 The Pre-ego, the Primal Ego, and the Internality of Subjects\n	References\nChapter 7: The First Specific Abstractive Reduction in Seebohm’s Theory of Science\n	7.1 Introduction\n	7.2 The World of Everyday Life\n	7.3 Three Specific Abstract Reductions\n	References\nChapter 8: Mathesis and Lifeworld: Some Remarks on Thomas Seebohm’s History as a Science and the System of the Sciences\n	References\nChapter 9: From the Epistemology of Physics to the Phenomenology of Nature: Some Reflections in the Wake of Seebohm’s Theses\n	9.1 A Way Out of the Paralyzing Dilemma of Phenomenology\n	9.2 What Calls for the Philosopher in Contemporary Physics?\n	9.3 The Thematic Attitude of the Modern Physics: Causes and Consequences of the “Second Abstraction”\n	9.4 The Sense of Nature and Physics\n	9.5 The Puzzles of Quantum Physics: A Final Reflection\n	References\nChapter 10: The Inadequacy of Husserlian Formal Mereology for the Regional Ontology of Chemical Wholes\n	10.1 Introduction\n	10.2 The Principles of Husserlian Mereology for Formal Ontology\n	10.3 The Application of Husserlian Mereology to the Higher-Order Regional Ontologies of Organic Wholes\n	10.4 The Application of Summative Extensional Mereology to the Lower-Order Regional Ontology of Chemical Wholes\n	References\nChapter 11: Science, Intentionality, Control, and the Strata of Experience\n	References\nChapter 12: Husserl on the Human Sciences in Ideen II\n	12.1 Introduction\n	12.2 Concluding Remarks\nChapter 13: Fichte’s and Husserl’s Critique of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction\n	13.1 The Enigmas of the Transcendental Deduction\n	13.2 Fichte’s Solution\n	13.3 Husserl’s Solution\n	13.4 Comparison\nChapter 14: The Paradox of Subjectivity and the Idea of Ultimate Grounding in Husserl and Heidegger\nChapter 15: Possible “Worlds”: Remarks About a Contoversy\nBibliography and Editorial Activity: Thomas A. Seebohm\n	Books\n		Monographs\n		Editor\n		Coeditor\n	Chapters in Books\n	Journal Articles\n	Reviews\n	Editorial Boards\n		Series\n		Journals