دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش:
نویسندگان: Robert S.D. Crellin
سری:
ISBN (شابک) : 1789256771, 9781789256772
ناشر: Oxbow Books
سال نشر: 2022
تعداد صفحات: 256
[321]
زبان: English
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود)
حجم فایل: 3 Mb
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب The Semantics of Word Division in Northwest Semitic Writing Systems: Ugaritic, Phoenician, Hebrew, Moabite and Greek (Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS)) به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب معناشناسی تقسیم کلمات در سیستمهای نوشتاری سامی شمال غربی: اوگاریتی، فنیقی، عبری، موآبی و یونانی (زمینهها و روابط بین سیستمهای نوشتاری اولیه (CREWS)) نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
Much focus in research on alphabetic writing systems has
been on correspondences between graphemes and phonemes. The
present study sets out to complement these by examining the
linguistic denotation of markers of word division in several
ancient Northwest Semitic (NWS) writing systems, namely,
Ugaritic, Phoenician, Moabite, and Hebrew, as well as
alphabetic Greek. While in Modern European languages words on
the page are separated on the basis of morphosyntax, I argue
that in most NWS writing systems words are divided on the basis
of prosody: ‘words’ are units which must be pronounced together
with a single primary accent or stress, or as a single
phrase.
After an introduction providing the necessary theoretical
groundwork, Part I considers word division in Phoenician
inscriptions. I show that word division at the levels of both
the prosodic word and of the prosodic phrase may be found in
Phoenician, and that the distributions match those of prosodic
words and prosodic phrases in Tiberian Hebrew. The latter is a
source where, unlike the rest of the material considered, the
prosody is well represented. In Part II, word division in
Ugaritic alphabetic cuneiform is analyzed. Here two-word
division strategies are identified, corresponding broadly to
two genres of text: viz, literary, and administrative
documents. Word division in the orthography of literary and of
some other texts separates prosodic words. By contrast, in many
administrative (and some other) documents, words are separated
on the basis of morphosyntax, anticipating later word division
strategies in Europe by several centuries. Part III considers
word division in the consonantal text of the Masoretic
tradition of Biblical Hebrew. Here word division is found to
mark out ‘minimal prosodic words’. I show that this word
division orthography is also found in early Moabite and Hebrew
inscriptions. Word division in alphabetic Greek inscriptions is
the topic of Part IV. Whilst it is agreed that word division
marks out prosodic words, the precise relationship of these
units to the pitch accent and the rhythm of the language is not
so clear, and consequently this issue is addressed in detail.
Finally, the Epilogue considers the societal context of word
division in each of the writing systems examined, to attempt to
discern the rationales for the prosodic word division
strategies adopted.
Contexts of and Relations between Early Writing Systems (CREWS)
is a project funded by the European Research Council under the
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
(grant agreement No. 677758), and based in the Faculty of
Classics, University of Cambridge.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
1. Introduction
1.1. What is a word?
1.2. Why Northwest Semitic and Greek?
1.3. Wordhood in writing systems research
1.4. Linguistic levels of wordhood
1.5. Word division at the syntax-phonology interface
1.6. Previous scholarship
1.7. Method
1.8. Outline
Part I Phoenician
2.
Introduction
2.1. Overview
2.2. Literature review
2.3. Corpus
2.4. Linguistic and sociocultural identity of the
inscriptions
2.5. Proto-alphabetic
2.6. Shared characteristics of word division
2.7. Divergence in word division practice
3. Prosodic words
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Distribution of word division
3.3. Graphematic weight of function words
3.4. Morphosyntax of univerbated syntagms
3.5. Sandhi assimilation
3.6. Comparison of composition and distribution with prosodic
words in Tiberian Hebrew
3.7. Conclusion
4. Prosodic phrase division
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Syntax of univerbated syntagms
4.3. Comparison with prosodic phrases in Tiberian Hebrew
4.4. Syntactic vs. prosodic phrase level analysis
4.5. Verse form
4.6. Conclusion
Part II Ugaritic alphabetic
cuneiform
5. Introduction
5.1. Overview
5.2. Literature review
5.3. Basic patterns of word division and univerbation
5.4. Exceptions to the basic patterns of word division
5.5. Line division
5.6. Contexts of use
5.7. Textual issues
5.8. Inconsistent nature of univerbation
5.9. Hypothesis: Graphematic words represent actual prosodic
words
6. The Ugaritic ‘Majority’ orthography
6.1. Introduction
6.2. Syntagms particularly associated with univerbation
6.3. Univerbation with nouns
6.4. Univerbation with verbs
6.5. Univerbation with suffix pronouns
6.6. Univerbation at clause and phrase boundaries
6.7. Summary
7. Quantitative comparison of Ugaritic and Tiberian
Hebrew
7.1. Introduction
7.2. Corpus
7.3. Frequency of occurrence
7.4. Length of phrase
7.5. Quantifying the morphosyntactic collocation of linking
features
7.6. Measuring Association Score B for Ugaritic and Tiberian
Hebrew
7.7. Visualising morphosyntactic collocation of linking
features with MDS
7.8. Conclusion
8. Semantics of word division in the Ugaritic ‘Majority’
orthography: prosodic word or prosodic phrase
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Graphematic wordhood in the Ugaritic ‘Majority’
orthography
8.3. Consistency of the representation of ACTUAL PROSODIC
WORDHOOD in Ugaritic
8.4. Univerbation at clause boundaries
8.5. Adoption of the ‘Majority’ orthography outside of literary
contexts
9. Separation of prefix clitics
9.1. Introduction
9.2. Literary texts
9.3. Non-literary texts adopting the ‘Majority’
orthography
9.4. Non-literary texts adopting the ‘Minority’
orthography
9.5. Conclusion
Part III Hebrew and
Moabite
10. Introduction
10.1. Introduction
10.2. Morphosyntactic status of graphematic affixes in Tiberian
Hebrew
10.3. Morphosyntactic status of graphematic affixes
10.4. Graphematic status of graphematic affixes
10.5. Conclusion
11. Word division in the consonantal Masoretic Text: Minimal
prosodic words
11.1. Introduction
11.2. Combining prosody and morphosyntax (Dresher 1994; Dresher
2009)
11.3. Accounting for graphematic wordhood prosodically
11.4. מַה mah “What?”
11.5. לֹא lōʾ
11.6. Minimal domains for stress assignment and sandhi
11.7. Conclusion
12. Minimal prosodic words in epigraphic Hebrew and
Moabite
12.1. Introduction
12.2. Siloam Tunnel inscription
12.3. Meshaʿ stelae (KAI 181 and KAI 30)
12.4. Accounting for word division in the Meshaʿ and Siloam
inscriptions
12.5. Conclusion
12.6. Conclusion to Part III
Part IV Epigraphic
Greek
13. Introduction
13.1. Overview
13.2. Corpus
13.3. Prosodic wordhood in Ancient Greek
13.4. Metre and natural language
13.5. Problems with identifying graphematic words with prosodic
words
13.6. Conclusion
14. The pitch accent and prosodic words
14.1. Introduction
14.2. Prosody of postpositives and enclitics
14.3. Prosody of prepositives and ‘proclitics’
14.4. Conclusion
15. Domains of pitch accent and rhythm
15.1. Introduction
15.2. Challenging the inherited tradition of accentuation
15.3. Pitch accentuation and rhythmic prominence have different
domains
15.4. Rhythmic words are canonically trimoraic or greater
15.5. Graphematic words correspond to rhythmic words
15.6. Conclusion
16. Graphematic words with multiple lexicals
16.1. Introduction
16.2. Inconsistency of levels of graphematic
representation
16.3. Prosodic subordination of one lexical to another
16.4. Punctuating canonical rhythmic words
16.5. Conclusion
17. Conclusion: The context of word division
17.1. Overview
17.2. Orality and literacy
17.3. Prosodic word level punctuation is a function of the oral
performance of texts
Bibliography
Contents Acknowledgements Abbreviations Chapter 1 Introduction PART I Phoenician inscriptions Chapter 2 Introduction Chapter 3 Prosodic words Chapter 4 Prosodic phrases PART II Ugaritic alphabetic cuneiform Chapter 5 Introduction Chapter 6 The Ugaritic ‘Majority’ orthography Chapter 7 Quantitative comparison of Ugaritic and Tiberian Hebrew Chapter 8 Semantics of word division and univerbation in the ‘Majority’ orthography: prosodic word or prosodic phrase? Chapter 9 Separation of prefix clitics PART III Hebrew and Moabite Chapter 10 Word division in the consontantal text of the Hebrew Bible Chapter 11 Word division in the consonantal Masoretic Text: Minimal prosodic words Chapter 12 Minimal prosodic words in epigraphic Hebrew and Moabite PART IV Epigraphic Greek Chapter 13 Introduction Chapter 14 The pitch accent and prosodic words Chapter 15 Domains of pitch accent and rhythm Chapter 16 Graphematic words with multiple lexicals Chapter 17 Epilogue: The context of word division Bibliography