Syntax and Semantics Volume 33: Long Distance Reflexives

Front Cover......Page 1
Syntax And Semantics Volume 33......Page 2
Editorial Board......Page 3
Title Page......Page 4
Copyright......Page 5
Contents......Page 6
1. Long-distance Reflexives Anduniversal Grammar......Page 14
2. Typological Properties Of Long-distance Reflexives......Page 15
3. The Groningen And Cornell Workshops......Page 16
4. Pronoun Or Bound Anaphor......Page 17
5.1. Variation Among Languages And Dialects With Bound Anaphor Long-distance Reflexives......Page 20
5.2. Absence Of Logophoric Conditions On Pronominal Long-distance Reflexives......Page 21
5.3. Logophoric "conversion" Of Reflexives To Pronominals......Page 22
6. Logophoric Pronouns And Logophoric Restrictions On Long-distance Reflexives......Page 23
7. Logophoricity And Attitudes De Se......Page 26
8. The Dividing Line Between Local And Long-distance Reflexives......Page 28
9.1. Monomorphemicity......Page 31
9.2. C-command And Subject Orientation......Page 32
9.3. The Blocking Effect......Page 36
10. Theories Of Long-distance Reflexives......Page 38
Acknowledgments......Page 42
Notes......Page 43
References......Page 47
1. Introduction: Approaches To Long Distance Reflexives......Page 52
2. Logophoric Conditions On Ld Reflexives In Mandarin And Teochew......Page 55
3. Subcommanding Antecedents Of Ld Reflexives And Source/self Requirements On Antecedents......Page 57
4. Modifying Phrases As Tests For Source/self......Page 59
5. Additional Evidence On The Role Of Self......Page 61
6. Pivot Restrictions......Page 62
7. Logophoricity And Attitudes De Se......Page 67
8. The Syntactic And Semantic Analysis Of Attitudes De Se......Page 70
9. The Binding Theoretical Status Of Ld Reflexives......Page 74
10. The C-command Requirement......Page 76
11. Vp Ellipsis......Page 77
12. The Blocking Effect Revisited......Page 79
13. Counter Examples To The Grammatical Account Of The Blocking Effect......Page 86
14. Conclusion......Page 87
Acknowledgments......Page 89
Notes......Page 90
References......Page 95
1. Introduction: Nonlocally Bound Anaphoric Expressions......Page 98
2. Lexical Forms Of Anaphors And Inflectional Morphology......Page 99
D. Pronoun-anaphor:......Page 100
2.2. Inflectional Categories......Page 101
2.3. Interaction Of Reflexive Antecedents And Verbal Inflection In Hindi/urdu......Page 102
3. Overview Of Binding Relations......Page 103
3.1.3. Subject Orientation......Page 104
3.1.5. Divergence Of Binding And Agreement......Page 105
3.2. The Blocking Effect And The Role Of Agr......Page 106
4. A Head-raising Account For Long-distance......Page 107
4.1. Lf Movement To Tense And Aspect......Page 108
4.2. Differences From The Cole/sung Analysis......Page 110
5.1. The Blocking Effect And The Role Of Agr/phi Features......Page 111
5.2  Binding Domains And Functional Heads In Hindi/urdu......Page 112
E. Causative:......Page 113
5.3. Distinguishing Tense/aspect From Agr As The Host Head In A Local Binding Domain......Page 116
5.4. Summary......Page 118
6. Syntactic/semantic Factors......Page 119
6.1. The "animacy" Condition......Page 120
6.2. Xp Reflexives......Page 121
6.3. Reflexive Movement......Page 124
7. Summary And Conclusion......Page 126
8. Appendix: Object Agreement And Subject Orientation......Page 128
Notes......Page 129
References......Page 132
1. Why Do Only Some Languages Have Long-distance Reflexives?......Page 134
2. Riau Indonesian......Page 136
3. Sendiri As A Reflexive Anaphor......Page 139
3.1. Sendiri May C-command Its Would-be Antecedent......Page 140
3.2. Sendiri May Stand Alone......Page 142
3.3. Sendiri May Have Nonreflexive Interpretations......Page 143
4.1. A Unified Semantic Analysis For Sendiri......Page 149
4.2. Why Sendiri Does Not Have Long-distance Interpretations......Page 155
5.1. Other Forms In Riau Indonesian......Page 157
Acknowledgments......Page 162
References......Page 165
1. Introduction......Page 170
2.1. The Non-coargument Theory......Page 171
2.2. The Lf-movement Theory......Page 174
3. Using Child Language As Evidence: Avrutin And Cunningham (1997)......Page 177
4. Experimental Evidence From Norwegian Child Language......Page 179
4.1. Experiment 1: Possessive Reflexives And Reflexives In Locative Pps......Page 180
4.2. Experiment 2: Reflexives In Picture Nps......Page 185
4.3. Within-subjects Comparison......Page 187
5. Conclusion......Page 189
References......Page 190
1. Introduction......Page 192
2. Previous Analyses......Page 194
2.1. The Formal Analyses......Page 195
2.2. The Functional Analyses......Page 198
2.3. Nonuniform Approaches......Page 201
3.1. Logophoricity, Direct Discourse, And Attitudes De Se......Page 205
3.2.1. Sentence-free Ziji Refers To Speaker......Page 208
3.2.2. Binding By Internal Source Or Self......Page 209
3.2.3. Consciousness......Page 210
3.2.4. Blocking Effects Explained......Page 212
4.1. Local Binding......Page 217
4.2. The Dividing Line: Governing Category......Page 219
4.3. Subcommanding Antecedents......Page 221
4.4. Comparison With Other Mixed Approaches......Page 223
5.1. The Semantics Of Logophoricity......Page 225
5.2. The Lf Syntax Of Logophoricity......Page 227
5.3. Extensions: Consciousness And Perspectivity......Page 230
5.4. Comparison With Pan......Page 233
6. Summary......Page 235
1. Introduction: Types Of Morphologically Free Reflexives......Page 248
2. Differences Between The Bare And The Inflected Reflexive......Page 251
3. The Nature Of The Inflected Reflexive: A Ld-reflexive Or A Pronoun?......Page 252
3.1. The Binding Domain Of Inflected Reflexives......Page 253
3.2. Properties Of Ld-reflexives......Page 254
3.3. The Turkish Inflected Reflexive Is Not A Ld-reflexive......Page 255
4.1. Underdetermined Binding Features......Page 256
4.2. The Inflected Reflexive: A Phrase In Disguise......Page 257
4.3. Empirical Support For The Phrasal Analysis: Other Possessive Phrases......Page 260
5.1. Differences Between Narrative And Standard Styles......Page 263
5.2. Second Round: Contrasting The Bare And The Inflected Reflexives And The Overt Pronoun......Page 264
5.3. Possessor Raising And The Bare Reflexive: Possessor Raising Examples In Unaccusative Constructions......Page 267
6. Complex Reflexives......Page 268
7. Conclusion......Page 270
Notes......Page 271
References......Page 275
1. Introduction......Page 278
2. Anaphora In Kannada......Page 280
3.1. Semantic Distinctions Between Anaphors......Page 283
3.2. Pure-reflexivity Vs Near-reflexivity......Page 285
3.3. Condition R......Page 287
4.1. All Coargument-bound Anaphors Are Near-reflexives......Page 288
4.2. Variation In Lexical Reflexivity......Page 291
5.1. The Hybrid Pronoun Gambit......Page 293
5.2. Predicate-centered Binding Theory......Page 297
6. Conclusions......Page 301
Notes......Page 302
1. Introduction......Page 306
2. Local Reflexivization......Page 308
3. Logophoric Reflexivization......Page 310
4.1. Sentence-bounded......Page 312
4.2. Serialization......Page 313
4.3. Chained Adjunct Clauses......Page 314
4.4. Complement Clauses......Page 315
4.6. Ldr From Non-main Clause......Page 316
4.8. No Upwards Ldr......Page 317
4.9.2. Modality......Page 318
4.10. Conditions On Multiple Ldr And Multiple Anaphora......Page 319
4.10.1. Person Interaction......Page 320
4.10.2. One Reflexive Category Per Clause......Page 323
4.10.3. Main-clause Antecedent......Page 324
5. Conclusion......Page 325
Acknowledgments......Page 326
Notes......Page 327
References......Page 328
1. Introduction......Page 330
2. The Blocking Effect......Page 331
3. The Blocking Effect Is Not Symmetrical......Page 333
4.1 Feature Compatibility Checking......Page 337
4.2. Closeness And Potential Binders......Page 338
4.3. Logophoricity And Perspectivity......Page 340
5.1. My View Of Mandarin Reflexives......Page 344
5.2. Beliefs De Re, De Se, And De Dicto......Page 345
5.3. Self-ascription Ziji Points To The Carrier Of Belief......Page 347
5.4 The Condition For Self-ascription Ziji......Page 348
6. Discussion......Page 356
7. Conclusion......Page 359
Notes......Page 360
References......Page 365
1. Introduction......Page 368
2.1. Limitations Of Binding Principle A......Page 371
2.2. A Revision Of Binding Principle A......Page 373
2.3. Binding For Chinese And English Reflexives.......Page 377
3. Nonsyntactic Conditions On Ziji......Page 379
3.1. Logophoricity......Page 380
3.2. Contrast, Intensification, And Discourse Prominence......Page 384
4. Conclusion......Page 386
Notes......Page 389
References......Page 391
1. Introduction......Page 394
2. Interpreting......Page 397
3. Non-c-commanding Antecedents......Page 399
4. The Interpretive Process......Page 401
4.1. Interpreting Pronominal Elements......Page 402
4.2. Pronominal Binding And Anaphor Binding......Page 405
4.3. Syntactic Conditions On Free Anaphors......Page 407
5. What Makes A Pronominal Interpretation Of Logophoric?......Page 408
5.1. The Nature Of Logophoric Interpretation......Page 410
5.2 Why Are Free Anaphors Interpreted Logophorically?......Page 412
6. Summary And Conclusion......Page 414
Notes......Page 415
References......Page 419
Index......Page 422
Syntax And Semantics......Page 430