Surveillance and Privacy in the Digital Age: European, Transatlantic and Global Perspectives

Cover
Half title
Series title
Title
Copyright
Contents
List Of Contributors
Introduction: Protecting Privacy in the Digital Age: European, Transatlantic and Global Challenges
Part 1 |  The Challenge Of Digital Evidence
	1 | Cross-Border Access and Exchange of Digital Evidence: Cloud Computing Challenges to Human Rights and the Rule of Law
		I | Introduction
		II | Cross-Border Access to Evidence Stored in the Cloud
		III | Two Approaches to Cross-Border Access to Clouds: EU v US
		IV | Should it Matter where '0s' and '1s' are Stored?
	2 | Sword, Shield and Cloud: Toward a European System of Public-Private Orders for Electronic Evidence in Criminal Matters?
		I | Introduction
		II | Local Enforcers on a Globalised Crime Scene
		III | The E-Evidence Proposals
		IV | The Place of E-Evidence in a Complex Regulatory Field: Added Value, Necessity and Proportionality
		V | Conclusion
	3 | The Commission's E-Evidence Initiative: Harmonising EU Rules on Access to Electronic Evidence
		I | Introduction
		II | The Challenge
		III | The EU's Proposed Solution: The E-Evidence Package
		IV | Potential Reforms to the E-Evidence Regulation
		V | Conclusion
	4 | The US CLOUD Act: Legislation that is Bad for Human Rights
		I | Introduction
		II | Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties
		III | The CLOUD Act
		IV | Recommendations for US Companies
		V | Conclusion
Part 2 |  New Surveillance Challenges
	5 | The Privatisation of Surveillance in the Digital Age
		I | Introduction
		II | Retaining
		III | Transferring and 'Making Available'
		IV | Removing
		V | (Post-Covid) Tracking and Tracing
		VI | Conclusion: Transforming Duties, Transforming Rights?
		The Privatisation of Surveillance in the Digital Age
	6 | Interoperability of EU Information Systems in a 'Panopticon' Union: A Leap Towards Maximised Use of Third-Country Nationals' Data or a Step Backwards in the Protection of Fundamental Rights?
		I | Introduction
		II | The Complex Landscape of EU Centralised Databases for Third-Country Nationals
		III | Compartmentalisation is Dead! Long Live Interoperability
		IV | Interoperability: The Messy 'Glue' that Will Bind Information Systems
		V | Interoperability: A Bottomless Barrel?
		VI | Conclusion
	7 | Privacy and Surveillance in a Digital Era: Transnational Implications of China's Surveillance State
		I | Introduction
		II | Change and Continuity in the Construction of Digital China
		III | Transnational Implications for the European Union
		IV | Conclusion
Part 3 |  Human Rights Responses
	8 | Mapping Limitations on State Surveillance through the UN Human Rights Instruments
		I | Introduction
		II | The UN System: Binding International Norms?
		III | The Right to Privacy in UN Human Rights Law
		IV | The OHCHR Report: The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age
		V | What is the Importance of the Report?
		VI | Applying and Enforcing the UN Standards on the Right to Privacy
		VII | Conclusion
	9 | Data Protection and Surveillance: The Perspective of EU Law
		I | Introduction
		II | The Changing Landscape of Privacy and Surveillance in the European Union
		III | Proportionality in the Case Law of the CJEU on Privacy and Surveillance
		IV | The Focus of the Data Protection Reform: Accountable Organisations
		V | The Contributions of Data Protection Authorities
		VI | The Limitations of the European Union
		VII | Conclusion: The Need for New Perspectives for Balancing Privacy and Security/Surveillance
	10 | One European Legal Framework for Surveillance: The ECtHR's Expanded Legality Testing Copied by the CJEU
		I | Introduction – From Interception to Bulk Surveillance: Reading Across and Amending the Principles
		II | First Formulation of the European Human Rights Framework for Surveillance: Klass v Germany
		III | Deepening First Understandings in the Context of Criminal Law and Police Needs for Metadata: Malone v the United Kingdom
		IV | Perfecting Malone's Legality Framework for Telephone Surveillance: Huvig v France
		V | Creating a Complementary Framework with Fainter Legality Limits for Fainter Surveillance: Uzun v Germany
		VI | Creating a Coherent Framework for Surveillance not Present in Klass: Weber and Saravia v Germany and Big Brother Watch v the United Kingdom
		VII | A Difficulty with the Framework Remains: When to Apply 'Huvig-Light' for Less Intrusive Surveillance?
		VIII | Narrowing the Margin of Discretion for Introducing Surveillance? Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v Sweden
		IX | Segerstedt-Wiberg: Adding Strict Scrutiny to Klass
		X | Notification: From Valuable to Essential (Part of the Huvig/Weber Package?)
		XI | If Notification is so Valuable, Why is it Missing in Many Criminal and Other Law Provisions?
		XII | The CJEU Influence to the Surveillance Testing (Digital Rights Ireland, Tele2, Opinion 1/15)
		XIII | A Pragmatic ECtHR in Big Brother Watch and Centrum För Rättvisa: Rejecting the CJEU?
		XIV | Synthesis: The Evolution of the ECtHR Case Law from Klass to Nowadays
Afterword
Index