Romantic Metasubjectivity through Schelling and Jung: Rethinking the Romantic Subject

Cover
Half Title
Series Page
Title Page
Copyright Page
Contents
Acknowledgements
List of abbreviations
Introduction: a word to the “Why”s
	Why Romanticism?
	Why Schelling? The absolute subject, or the  logic of the third
	Why Jung? Anatomy of a difference
	Jung and the resistance to theory
1. A first outline of Romantic metasubjectivity
	Schelling’s Naturphilosophie: inhibition and “unnatural nature”
	Freud and Jung: borders and border zones
	Freud: the pleasure principle…and beyond
	Inter-section: Deleuze’s perversion of libido
	Jung: analytical psychology, Weltanschauung, and the fluidity of Being
2. The Romantic metasubjective unconscious: dissociation, historicity, trauma
	Schelling’s actant: derangement, drive, disease
	Jung’s archetype: dissociation
	The grammatology of Being
3. Romantic metasubjectivity: experience
	On the “nature” of “philosophy” as “science”
	The System of Transcendental Idealism:  self-consciousness and its discontent
	Jung and synchronicity
4. Romantic metasubjectivity: individuation
	Schelling’s Freedom essay: the Ungrund and the emergence of personality
	Evil and the dialectic of production
	Excursus: Hölderlin and the rhythm of Romantic ontology
	Schelling’s Ages of the World (1815): the work of yearning
	The movement of the potencies
	Jung, individuation and the self
5. Romantic myth-subjectivity: Wordsworth and Shelley
	The 1799 Prelude: potency, amplification
	The 1805 Prelude: the burden of the unnatural self
	Prometheus Unbound: the traumatic awakening of Romantic metasubjectivity
6. Conclusion: Romantic meth-subjectivity
	Answer to Job: even God must individuate
	The darkness of obligation
	Breaking Bad: crystal clear morality
Appendix A: Disentangling Romantic metasubjectivity
Appendix B: Situating Romantic metasubjectivity
Appendix C: Self and archetype
Bibliography
Index