دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش:
نویسندگان: Nikitas E Hatzimihail
سری:
ISBN (شابک) : 1139016679, 9781139016674
ناشر: Cambridge University Press
سال نشر: 2021
تعداد صفحات: 644
زبان: English
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود)
حجم فایل: 6 مگابایت
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Preclassical Conflict of Laws به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب تضاد قوانین پیش کلاسیک نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
«تقریباً در هر کتاب درسی حقوق بینالملل خصوصی، اشارهای به حقوقدانان قرون وسطی و اوایل مدرن وجود دارد که ادعا میشود در مورد تعارض قوانین نوشتهاند. چنین ارجاعی اغلب بسیار مختصر است. به نظر میرسد برخی از سنگ بنای حقوق بینالملل پرده برداری میکنند. کل بنای اعتقادی ما، اما بسیاری دیگر ممکن است زینتی به نظر برسند و احساس کنند که برای استدلال نویسنده آنها اهمیتی ندارد. در این کتاب بحث خواهد شد، مهم است، اگر نادیده گرفته شود، و همچنین اشتباه فهمیده شود.
"In almost every textbook on private international law, there is a reference to the medieval and early modern jurists who, it is claimed, wrote on the conflict of laws. Such references are often very brief. Some appear to unveil the foundation stone of our whole doctrinal edifice, but many others may look and feel ornamental, of no importance to their author's argument. What matters the most is that, taken together these references constitute an integral aspect of our thinking about private international law - an aspect that, it will be argued in this book, is important, if neglected, and also misunderstood"--
Cover Half-title Series information Title page Copyright information Dedication Epigraph Contents List of Figures, Tables and Maps Figures Tables Maps Acknowledgments 1 Introduction 1.1 Prologue 1.2 The End of History for Private International Law? 1.3 An Historicism for the Age of Globalization 1.4 Revisiting the Early History of Private International Law 1.5 An Historical Outline 1.5.1 Theories of Statutes, or: Preclassical Conflict of Laws 1.5.1.1 History and Prehistory 1.5.2 The Choice-of-Law Method, or: Classical Conflict of Laws 1.5.3 Revolution, Crisis, Pluralism: Modern Conflict of Laws 1.5.4 Classical, Preclassical, and Modern 1.5.5 Theory and Practice 1.5.6 On Conflict of Laws, Private International Law, and Other Names 1.6 Conceptual Premises 1.6.1 The Discipline of Private International Law 1.6.2 The Governance Functions of Private International Law 1.6.2.1 International Governance and Private International Law 1.6.2.2 Private-Law Governance and Private International Law 1.6.2.3 Autonomy 1.6.3 A ''Remarkable Trinity'' 1.7 Structure of the Book Part I History and Historiography in the Conflict of Laws 2 Uses of History in Private International Law 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Materials 2.2.1 Conflicts History as Textbook History 2.2.1.1 Structure and Narratives 2.2.1.2 Historical Consciousness in the Common-Law World 2.2.2 Historical Studies 2.3 Conflicts Historiography in the Beginnings 2.3.1 Preclassical Historical Consciousness 2.3.2 Moments of Transition 2.3.2.1 Savigny 2.3.2.2 Demangeat 2.3.2.3 John Westlake in 1858 2.4 The Discipline Ascendant: Progress Narratives in Classical Private International Law 2.4.1 François Laurent in 1880 2.4.2 Armand Lainé in 1888 2.4.3 A Lost Cause? de Vareilles-Sommières in 1897 2.4.4 Eugen Ehrlich in 1906 2.5 The Discipline Persists: Interwar Progress Narratives 2.5.1 Scientific Optimism: Max Gutzwiller in 1929 2.5.2 Progress as Struggle: Meijers in 1934 2.5.3 The Triumph of Comparative Law: Ernst Rabel in 1945 2.6 History as Pedigree: Conflict and Eclecticism in Modern Private International Law 2.6.1 Variations on a Theme 2.6.1.1 History as Quest 2.6.1.2 History as Dialectics 2.6.1.3 History as Marxist Narrative 2.6.1.4 History in Circles 2.6.2 Historicism and Pedigree History 2.6.2.1 Explanatory Historicism 2.6.2.2 Normative Historicism 2.6.2.3 Archaeological Historicism 2.6.3 Historical Narratives as Opposition 2.6.3.1 The Genealogies of Lex Mercatoria 2.6.3.2 The End of History as Progress Narrative 2.7 Concluding Remarks 3 Preclassical Conflict of Laws in the Historical Consciousness 3.1 Introduction 3.2 The Narrative 3.2.1 Mutations 3.3 The Division into Schools 3.3.1 Schools as Paradigm 3.3.1.1 Italian School 3.3.1.2 French School 3.3.1.3 Dutch School 3.3.1.4 A Comment 3.3.2 National Schools 3.3.3 A Sociological Approach 3.3.4 A Contextual Definition 3.4 The Foundational Moment: ''Si Bononiensis'' 3.4.1 Of Founders 3.4.2 Foundations 3.4.3 An Alternative Foundational Moment? Aldricus: ''potior et utilior'' 3.5 Neglected Influences? Alternative Narratives about the Foundational Moment 3.5.1 A Role for Court Practice and Customary Law 3.5.2 Law Merchant and the Conflict of Laws 3.5.3 Canon Law and the Conflict of Laws 3.6 Conclusion Part II Current Concerns 4 Conflict of Laws as a Conceptual Battlefield 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Territorialism and Personalism 4.2.1 Definitions 4.2.2 Personalist Approaches: Domicile v. Nationality 4.2.3 Territorial Approaches: Actus v. Situs 4.2.3.1 Public Policy Territorialism 4.3 Unilateralism in the Conflict of Laws 4.3.1 Doctrinal Unilateralism: The Choice-of-Law Process 4.3.1.1 Technically Unilateral Rules 4.3.1.2 Determining Who Determines the Scope of Foreign Law 4.3.1.3 Doctrinal Unilateralism as ''International Governance'' 4.3.1.4 Jurisprudential Aspects of Doctrinal Unilateralism 4.3.2 Political Unilateralism: Extraterritorial Effects of Regulation 4.3.3 Limited Unilateralism 4.3.4 Absolute Unilateralism 4.4 Universalism and Particularism 4.5 Perspectives and Ideologies: Internationalism, Nationalism 4.6 Conflict of Laws as a ''Conflict of Sovereignties'' 4.6.1 The ''Conflict of Sovereignties'' in Historical Narratives 4.6.2 A Critique 4.7 Conclusion 5 Conflict of Laws as a Doctrinal Exercise 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Legal Reasoning in Conflicts Works 5.2.1 On Rules and Formalism 5.2.2 The Invocation of General Principles 5.3 The Classification of the Legal Subject Matter 5.4 The Distinction between Formalities, Procedural, and Substantive Matters in the Conflict of Laws 5.4.1 Form as a Private-Law Construct 5.4.1.1 Formalities as a Burden or Intervention 5.4.1.2 Formalities as the Liberal Course of Action 5.4.2 Procedural Formalism and the Distinction between Substance and Procedure in Conflicts Doctrine 5.5 Conflict of Jurisdictions and Conflict of Laws 5.5.1 On the Relationship between Choice-of-Law and Jurisdiction Rules 5.6 Individuals, Party Autonomy, and the Conflict of Laws 5.6.1 On the Individual as the Epicenter of a Conflicts System 5.6.2 On Party Autonomy 5.7 Decisional Harmony 6 Conflict of Laws as a World System 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Mediating between Perspectives 6.3 International Law as a Governance Project 6.4 International Law as Doctrinal Foundation 6.5 World Views and World Systems 6.6 Conclusion Part III Bartolus da Sassoferrato and the Conflict of Laws in the Middle Ages 7 ''Nunc veniamus ad glossam'': Bartolus on the Conflict of Laws 7.1 Introduction 7.2 The Commentary on cunctos populos 7.2.1 Establishing the Text 7.2.2 Basic Structure 7.3 ''Cujus occasione videnda sunt duo . . .'' 7.4 ''. . . utrum statuta porrigantur ad non subditos'' 7.4.1 Contracts (nus. 13-19) 7.4.2 Wrongs (nu. 20) 7.4.3 Testaments (nus. 21-26) 7.4.4 Rights over Real Property (nus. 27) 7.4.5 Clerical Privileges (nus. 28-31) 7.5 ''. . . utrum effectus statuti porrigat extra territorium statuentium'' 7.5.1 Prohibitive Statutes (nus. 32-33) 7.5.2 Permissive Statutes (nus. 34-43) 7.5.2.1 Statutes Conferring a Privilege 7.5.2.2 Statutes Facilitating Permissible Acts 7.5.2.2.1 Solemnity 7.5.2.2.2 Personal Status 7.5.2.3 The English Question: Primogeniture and Effects as to Property 7.5.3 Punitive Statutes (nus. 44-49) 7.5.3.1 Statutes with Explicit Extraterritorial Effect 7.5.3.2 Statutes Expressed in General Terms 7.5.4 Effects of Judgments (nus. 50-51) 7.5.4.1 Judgments as to Persons (in personam) 7.5.4.2 Judgments as to Property (in rem) 8 The Political Context of Bartolan Conflict of Laws 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Polities and Hierarchies 8.2.1 A World Empire (with Its Common Law) 8.2.2 Cities (and the Power to Make Law) 8.2.2.1 The Legislative Jurisdiction of Cities 8.2.2.2 The ''Internal Sovereignty'' of Cities 8.3 Laws and Their Hierarchies 8.3.1 Of Ius Gentium and the Law Common to All Peoples 8.3.2 From City Laws to City Law 8.3.3 Iura propria 8.3.3.1 Citizens at Home 8.3.3.2 Foreigners Abroad 8.3.3.3 Foreigners in the City 8.3.3.4 Subjects Abroad 8.3.3.5 Legal Acts and Legal Rights 8.4 Bartolus, Ius Commune, and the Conflict of Laws 9 Doctrinal Aspects of Bartolan Conflict of Laws 9.1 Introduction 9.2 Legal Style 9.2.1 Structure of the Text 9.2.2 Mode of Reasoning 9.3 Organization of the Legal Subject Matter 9.3.1 Contracts 9.3.2 Delicts, Wrongs, and Crimes 9.3.3 Succession 9.3.4 Property 9.3.5 Bartolus and the Law of Persons 9.3.6 Marriage and the Family 9.4 Form, Substance, and Procedure 9.4.1 Form, Solemnitas, and Formalities 9.4.2 Formalities and the Validity of Legal Acts 9.4.3 ''Form,'' ''Substance,'' and the Limits on the Reach of Local Law 9.4.4 Substance and Procedure 9.5 Conflicts of Jurisdictions and Conflicts of Laws 9.6 Individual Autonomy and Bartolan Conflict of Laws 9.7 Harmony of Solutions 9.8 Conclusion 10 Bartolan Conflict of Laws in the Conceptual Battlefield 10.1 Introduction 10.2 Bartolus and the Basic Theory of Statutes 10.2.1 Bartolus, the Basic Theory, and the Modern Historical Consciousness 10.2.2 Territorialism, Personalism, and the Bartolan Doctrine 10.2.3 Bartolus and the English Case 10.3 Bartolus and the Limits of Unilateralism 10.3.1 Permissive and Punitive Statutes 10.3.2 Punitive Statutes and Unilateralism 10.3.3 An a priori Unilateralism? 10.4 Bartolus and the Conflict of Sovereignties 10.5 Conclusion Part IV Ulrik Huber and Conflict of Laws in the Early Modern Period 11 ''Saepe fit, ut negotia'': Huber on the Conflict of Laws 11.1 Introduction 11.2 De Conflictu Legum Diversarum 11.2.1 The Text 11.2.2 Structure of the Text 11.3 Foundations 11.3.1 Foregrounding (§ 1) 11.3.2 Statement and Justification (§ 2) 11.3.2.1 Axioms 11.3.2.2 Citing the Digest 11.3.2.3 Discussing the Axioms 11.4 Primary Rule: locus regit actum 11.4.1 Acts inter vivos and mortis causa 11.4.1.1 Testaments (§ 4) 11.4.1.2 Contracts (§ 5) 11.4.2 Res judicata and Actions 11.4.2.1 Res judicata (§ 6) 11.4.2.2 Actions (§ 7) 11.4.3 Marriage 11.4.3.1 Validity (§ 8) 11.4.3.2 Effects (§ 9) 11.4.4 Limitations 11.4.4.1 Intention of the Parties (§ 10) 11.4.4.2 The Prejudice Exception (§ 11) 11.5 Second Rule: Personal Status and Capacity 11.5.1 The Rule: Personality (§ 12) 11.5.2 The Rule Does Not Create Personal Statutes (§§ 13-14) 11.6 Third Rule: The lex rei sitae Exception (§ 15) 11.6.1 The Rule as to Immovables 11.6.2 Intestate Succession and a Reference to Movable Property 11.7 Concluding 12 The Political Context of Huber's Conflict of Laws 12.1 Introduction 12.2 Ulrik Huber in Political Context 12.2.1 A Commercial Republic (or Republics) 12.2.2 Sovereignty and the State 12.2.2.1 Citizens, Foreigners, and Domicile 12.2.3 Religion 12.2.3.1 Protestantism, Catholicism, and Conflicts in Huber's Friesland 12.2.3.2 Religion and Early Modern Marriage 12.3 Legal Sources and Their Hierarchies 12.3.1 Natural Law and the Law of Nations 12.3.2 Civil Law 12.3.3 Judicial Power and Discretion 12.4 Sovereignty and Jurisdiction in Huber 12.4.1 Civil Jurisdiction over Foreigners in Huber 12.4.1.1 Arrest-Based Jurisdiction 12.4.2 Res Judicata, Jurisdiction, and Huber on the Conflict of Laws 12.4.3 Jurisdiction Theories and Huber 12.5 Conclusion 13 Doctrinal Aspects of Huber's Conflict of Laws 13.1 Introduction 13.2 Legal Style 13.2.1 Structure 13.2.2 Rational Ordering 13.2.2.1 A Novel Method 13.2.3 Practice and Pragmatism 13.3 The Organization of the Legal Subject Matter 13.3.1 Huber as an Institutist 13.3.2 Contracts and Obligations 13.3.3 Law of Persons 13.3.3.1 Marriage 13.3.3.2 Marital Property 13.3.4 Testaments and Property 13.4 Form and Substance in Huber 13.4.1 From Testaments to Contracts 13.4.2 Formal and Substantive Validity of Marriages 13.4.3 Procedure: or, Control by the Forum through Carving an Area of Form 13.5 Huber and the Conflict of Jurisdictions 13.6 Individual Autonomy in Huber's Conflict of Laws 13.7 Harmony of Solutions 13.8 Conclusion 14 Huber's Conflict of Laws in the Conceptual Battlefield 14.1 Introduction 14.2 Huber and Territorialism 14.2.1 Huber and Actus Territorialism 14.2.2 Actus Territorialism and Personalism 14.2.3 Actus and Situs Territorialism 14.2.4 Huber and Public Policy Territorialism 14.3 Huber as Unilateralist 14.4 Comity in Huber's Doctrine 14.4.1 Huber's Third Axiom 14.4.2 Comity from Paul to Johannes Voet 14.4.3 Comity as Foundation 14.4.4 Comity and Exceptions 14.4.4.1 Fighting against Evasion 14.4.4.2 Defending Local Laws 14.4.4.3 Defending Local Rights: Third-Party Rights and Conflicts of Obligations 14.5 Huber and the Conflict of Sovereignties Discourse 14.6 Conclusion Part V Epilogue 15 Preclassical Conflict of Laws Configured 15.1 Introduction 15.2 De Statutis 15.3 Addressing Private Law Problems 15.4 Political Foundations and Legal Hierarchies 15.5 A Conflicts Literature (and Discourse) 15.6 From Preclassical Conflict of Laws to Private International Law 15.7 The Hedgehog and the Fox Bibliography Primary Sources Manuscripts Original and Early Modern Printed Editions Modern Era Editions Translations Secondary Sources Index