Patient Autonomy and Criminal Law: European Perspectives

Cover
Half Title
Series Page
Title Page
Copyright Page
Table of Contents
Contributors
Introduction
Chapter 1 Patient autonomy and criminal law: An Austrian perspective
Chapter 2 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Belgian perspective (scalpels needed to replace blunt knives)
Chapter 3 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Bosnian-Herzegovinian perspective
Chapter 4 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Bulgarian perspective
Chapter 5 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Czech perspective
Chapter 6 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Finnish perspective
Chapter 7 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A German perspective
Chapter 8 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Greek perspective
Chapter 9 Patient autonomy and criminal law: An Italian perspective
Chapter 10 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Latvian perspective
Chapter 11 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Lithuanian perspective
Chapter 12 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Montenegrin perspective
Chapter 13 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Dutch perspective
Chapter 14 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Norwegian perspective
Chapter 15 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Polish perspective
Chapter 16 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Portuguese perspective
Chapter 17 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Russian perspective
Chapter 18 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Serbian perspective
Chapter 19 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Slovenian perspective
Chapter 20 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Spanish perspective
Chapter 21 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Swiss perspective
Chapter 22 Patient autonomy and criminal law: A Turkish perspective
Conclusion: A comparative look at the criminal law protection of patient autonomy in Europe
Index