دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
دسته بندی: تاریخ ویرایش: 1 نویسندگان: Tim Causer. Philip Schofield سری: Collected Works Of Jeremy Bentham ISBN (شابک) : 1787359387, 9781787359376 ناشر: UCL Press سال نشر: 2022 تعداد صفحات: 619 زبان: English فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود) حجم فایل: 9 مگابایت
کلمات کلیدی مربوط به کتاب Panopticon در مقابل نیو ساوت ولز و نوشته های دیگر در استرالیا: مستعمرات کیفری: استرالیا: نیو ساوت ولز: تاریخچه، زندانها: بریتانیای کبیر: تاریخچه: قرن 19، استرالیا: تاریخ: 1788-1851
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Panopticon Versus New South Wales And Other Writings On Australia به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب Panopticon در مقابل نیو ساوت ولز و نوشته های دیگر در استرالیا نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
نسخه کنونی Panopticon در مقابل نیو ساوت ولز و نوشتههای دیگر درباره استرالیا شامل نظرات پراکندهای با عنوان «ولز جدید» است که مربوط به سال 1791 است. مجموعه ای از مطالبی که در اوت 1802 برای ویلیام ویلبرفورس فرستاده شد. سه «نامه به لرد پلهام» و «درخواستی برای قانون اساسی» که در سالهای 1802–1803 نوشته شدهاند. و "پیشنهاد شرکت استعمار"، نوشته شده در اوت 1831، که اکثر آنها برای اولین بار در اینجا منتشر می شود. این نوشتهها، به استثنای «پیشنهاد شرکت استعمار»، با طرح مجازات پانوپتیکون بنتام پیوند نزدیکی دارند، که او آن را بهعنوان جایگزینی فوقالعاده برای حمل و نقل مجرمانه، زندانها و زندانهای انگلیسی از نظر اثربخشی در دستیابی به اهداف میدانست. از مجازات او همچنین استدلال کرد که هیچ مبنای قانونی مناسبی برای اختیار اعمال شده توسط فرماندار نیو ساوت ولز وجود ندارد. بر خلاف مخالفت خود با نیو ساوت ولز، بنتام بعداً "پیشنهاد شرکت استعمار" را در حمایت از طرحی که توسط انجمن ملی استعمار برای ایجاد مستعمره ای از مهاجران آزاد در جنوب استرالیا پیشنهاد شده بود، نوشت. او از «اصل به حداکثر رساندن مجاورت» دفاع میکرد، که به موجب آن، قطعات زمین به شیوهای منظم از شهرک اصلی فروخته میشد، و پیشنهاد کرد که ظرف چند سال، دولت مستعمره باید به یک دموکراسی نمایندگی تبدیل شود.
The present edition of Panopticon versus New South Wales and other writings on Australia consists of fragmentary comments headed ‘New Wales’, dating from 1791; a compilation of material sent to William Wilberforce in August 1802; three ‘Letters to Lord Pelham’ and ‘A Plea for the Constitution’, written in 1802–3; and ‘Colonization Company Proposal’, written in August 1831, the majority of which is published here for the first time. These writings, with the exception of ‘Colonization Company Proposal’, are intimately linked with Bentham’s panopticon penitentiary scheme, which he regarded as an immeasurably superior alternative to criminal transportation, the prison hulks, and English gaols in terms of its effectiveness in achieving the ends of punishment. He argued, moreover, that there was no adequate legal basis for the authority exercised by the Governor of New South Wales. In contrast to his opposition to New South Wales, Bentham later composed ‘Colonization Company Proposal’ in support of a scheme proposed by the National Colonization Society to establish a colony of free settlers in southern Australia. He advocated the ‘vicinity-maximizing principle’, whereby plots of land would be sold in an orderly fashion radiating from the main settlement, and suggested that, within a few years, the government of the colony should be transformed into a representative democracy.
Cover Half-title Series information Title page Copyright information Preface Table of contents SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS EDITORIAL INTRODUCTION NEW WALES Plan Disposal of Convicts—Management—Separation—Sexes Convict Proposal—New South Wales Public Wealth Influence Right wanting Extended Empire New South Wales Expence Provision Separanda Botany Bay—Resolutions against CORRESPONDENCE, SENT TO WILLIAM WILBERFORCE, OF JEREMY BENTHAM WITH SIR CHARLES BUNBURY No 1. Mr Bentham to Sir C. Bunbury. 12th April 1802 No 2. Mr Bentham to Sir C. Bunbury. 25th April 1802 No 3. Mr Bentham to Sir C. Bunbury. 30th July 1802 No 4. Sir C. Bunbury to Mr Bentham. 1st August 1802 No 5. Mr Bentham to Sir C. Bunbury. 2nd August 1802 No 6. Mr Bentham to Sir C. Bunbury. 9th August 1802 No 7. Mr Bentham to Sir C. Bunbury. 11th August 1802 No 8. Sir Charles Bunbury to Mr Bentham. 12th August 1802 No 9. Sir Charles Bunbury to Mr Bentham. 20th August 1802 No 10. Lord Pelham to Sir Charles Bunbury. 19th August 1802 No 11. Mr Bentham to Sir C. Bunbury. 21st August 1802 No 12. Title in case of impression No 13. Panopticon versus New South Wales Marginal Contents (not yet printed 9th August 1802) in two Sheets. Sheet 1 No 14. Panopticon versus New South Wales Marginal Contents (not yet printed 9th August 1802) in two Sheets. Sheet 2 APPENDIX LETTERS TO LORD PELHAM CIRCULAR. To the LORD CHANCELLOR and the JUDGES LETTER TO LORD PELHAM, &c. &c. &c. GIVING A COMPARATIVE VIEW OF THE SYSTEM OF PENAL COLONIZATION IN NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE HOME PENITENTIARY SYSTEM, PRESCRIBED BY TWO ACTS OF PARLIAMENT OF THE YEARS 1794 & 1799 § 1. Example § 2. Reformation § 3. Incapacitation § 4. Compensation § 5. Economy SECOND LETTER TO LORD PELHAM, &c. &c. &c. IN CONTINUATION OF THE COMPARATIVE VIEW OF THE SYSTEM OF PENAL COLONIZATION IN NEW SOUTH WALES, AND THE HOME PENITENTIARY SYSTEM, PRESCRIBED BY TWO ACTS OF PARLIAMENT OF THE YEARS 1794 & 1799 I. REFORMATION.—First Feature, Industry; Opposite Feature of Corruption, Sloth:—Prevalence of it in New South Wales II. Further Features of Reformation—Frugality and Forecast. Opposite Features of Corruption—Prodigality and Improvidence:—Prevalence of them in New South Wales III. Per contrà—Industry, Frugality, Forecast, in the American Penitentiary Houses.—1. Philadelphia House, instituted 1790 2. New York House; instituted 1790 3. Penitentiary System: Panopticon Mode IV. General Depravity—Prevalence of it in New South Wales, as attested in general Expressions 2. General Depravity continued—Females V. General Depravity—Particular Exemplifications VI. Depravity—Particular Exemplifications—Incendiarism VII. REMEDIES UNAVAILING. 1. Spiritual [2.]—Per contra, Penitentiary System VIII. REMEDIES UNAVAILING—Temporal—1. Punishments and Rewards—Evidence unobtainable —2. Police —3. Functionaries corrupt—Servants worthless IX. Main Cause of Non-reformation, Drunkenness: Universality and Incurableness of it in New South Wales X. Per contrà, Penitentiary System.—General Reformation, as attested in general Expressions.—1. During Confinement —2. after Liberation, as per Accounts. Penitentiary System continued—Reformation—Particular Exemplifications—Heroic Humanity. XI. Main Cause, Sobriety: Strictness, Universality, and good Effects of it in the Penitentiary Houses XII. CENTRAL-INSPECTION PRINCIPLE. 1. Escapes, for want of it, from the American Prisons, as above XIII. INSPECTION—the more perfect, the more perfect the Management; viz. in respect of Reformation, Incapacitation, as to Escapes, and Economy XIV. Fruit of the Penitentiary System, in point of Example, as well as Reformation.—Decrease of Crimes XV. NEW SOUTH WALES—ECONOMY—Prospects as per last Accounts XVI. English Hulks—and ‘improved Prisons’—Topics deferred THIRD LETTER TO LORD PELHAM &C. &C. &C. ON THE HULKS AND THE ‘IMPROVED’ PRISONS, IN CONTINUATION OF THE COMPARATIVE VIEW OF THE SYSTEM OF PENAL COLONIZATION IN NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE HOME PENITENTIARY SYSTEM, PRESCRIBED BY TWO ACTS OF PARLIAMENT OF THE YEARS 1794 & 1799 XVII. Hulk system compared with Penitentiary and New South Wales systems XVIII. Penitentiary system in England—Improved local prisons XIX. Hulk Mortality—Sinecure made to screen it APPENDIX. EXCISED PASSAGES A PLEA FOR THE CONSTITUTION: SHEWING THE ENORMITIES COMMITTED TO THE OPPRESSION OF BRITISH SUBJECTS, INNOCENT AS WELL AS GUILTY, IN BREACH OF MAGNA CHARTA, THE PETITION OF RIGHT, THE HABEAS CORPUS ACT, AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS; AS LIKEWISE OF THE SEVERAL TRANSPORTATION ACTS; IN AND BY THE DESIGN, FOUNDATION AND GOVERNMENT OF THE PENAL COLONY OF NEW SOUTH WALES: INCLUDING AN INQUIRY INTO THE RIGHT OF THE CROWN TO LEGISLATE WITHOUT PARLIAMENT IN TRINIDAD, AND OTHER BRITISH COLONIES CONTENTS PREFACE § 1. Subject Matter—Object—Plan § 2. Power of Legislation—its Necessity in New South Wales § 3. Legislation—how far lawful in New South Wales § 4. American, &c. Legislation no Precedent for New South Wales § 5. Even in America, the Crown had no right to legislate without Parliament § 6. Nullity of Legislation in New South Wales, for want of an Assembly to consent § 7. Nullity of Governor’s Ordinances, for want of a Court to 341try Offences against them § 8. King’s Law Servants not infallible § 9. Nullity of New South Wales Legislation, proved by the Granada Case § 10. Governor’s illegal Ordinances exemplified. 1. For Prevention of Famine § 11. Governor’s illegal Ordinances exemplified. 2. For Prevention of Drunkenness § 12. Expirees forcibly detained § 13. Expirees, during Detention, kept in a State of Bondage § 14. Statutes transgressed by the Legislation and Government of New South Wales II. Repugnancy of such Transgressions to Magna Charta, according to Coke and Comyns I. Transgressions in Breach of the Habeas Corpus Act— Penalties thereby incurred under the said Act III. Transgressions in Breach of the Petition of Right, 3 C. I. c. 1 IV. Transgressions in Breach of the Declaration of Rights V. Transgressions in Breach of the several Transportation Acts, by which that Punishment has been appointed for limited Lengths of Time APPENDIX. THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION CONQUERED IN NEW SOUTH WALES The British Constitution conquered in New South Wales COLONIZATION COMPANY PROPOSAL: BEING A PROPOSAL FOR THE FORMATION OF A JOINT-STOCK COMPANY BY THE NAME OF THE COLONIZATION COMPANY ON AN ENTIRELY NEW PRINCIPLE INTITULED THE VICINITY-MAXIMIZING OR DISPERSION-PREVENTING PRINCIPLE Preface Contents Chapter I. Special Ends in view Chapter II. Means of effectuation, primary, characteristic and distinctive—the Vicinity-maximizing or Dispersionpreventing principle § 1. Import and use of this term § 2. Dispersion its disad[van]tageous effects [Chapter III. Means of effectuation, pecuniary and quasipecuniary] Chapter IV. Means of effectuation, incitative: to the several parties whose cooperation is necessary or would be beneficial, inducements to take the several parts respectively desirous of them § 1. Inducements to Shareholders and other Contributors I. Outlay, or say Expenditure II. Return, or say Profit from the respective sources § 2. Settlers without capital—their inducements Observations Observations § 3. Settlers with capital in hand—their inducements § 4. Government—its inducements Chapter V. Constitution of the Company and the Colony considered in connection § 1. Difficulty suggested § 2. Remedy proposed Chapter VI. Company’s Constitution, what Chapter VII. Colonial Constitution § 1. What it can not be § 2. What it may be APPENDIX: EDWARD GIBBON WAKEFIELD ON THE COLONIZATION SOCIETY’S PLAN E. Gibbon Wakefield on the Colonization Society’s Plan, 23 Aug. 1831 COLLATION: PANOPTICON VERSUS NEW SOUTH WALES INDEX OF NAMES INDEX OF SUBJECTS