دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش:
نویسندگان: George Szmukler
سری:
ISBN (شابک) : 0198801041, 9780198801047
ناشر: Oxford University Press, USA
سال نشر: 2018
تعداد صفحات: 277
زبان: English
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود)
حجم فایل: 11 مگابایت
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Men in White Coats به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب مردانی با کت سفید نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
قوانین سلامت روان در مورد درمان روانپزشکی تحت اجبار تا حد زیادی از قرن هجدهم بدون تغییر باقی مانده است. دلایل درمان غیرارادی در روانپزشکی اولاً این است که بیمار دارای یک "اختلال روانی" است که درمان را ایجاب می کند. و دوم، اینکه بیمار باید به خاطر امنیت خود یا برای محافظت از دیگران تحت درمان قرار گیرد.\r\n\r\nمردان کت سفید: درمان تحت اجبار منبع در دسترس و به موقع در مورد درمان پزشکی تحت اجبار و توجیهات آن. جورج اسموکلر که به سیزده فصل تقسیم شده است، زمینه های فعلی درمان غیرارادی بیماران مبتلا به اختلالات روانی را بررسی می کند. او استدلال میکند که قوانین موجود هم تبعیضآمیز هستند و هم از نظر اخلاقی غیرقابل قبول، و باید با رویکردی کاملاً متفاوت برای امتناع بیش از حد از درمان جایگزین شوند.\r\n\r\nبا استفاده از مطالعات موردی و تجربیات واقعی، مردانی با کت سفید: درمان تحت اجباردرباره اینکه چگونه درمان غیرارادی در عمل روانپزشکی بر بیماران، خانوادههای آنها و جامعه تأثیر میگذارد، و به دنبال راهحلهای بالقوه برای چارچوبهای قانونی کنونی پیرامون اجبار است که میتواند در همه تخصصهای پزشکی قابل اجرا باشد. تنظیمات.
Mental health laws surrounding psychiatric treatment under coercion have remained largely unchanged since the eighteenth century. The grounds for involuntary treatment in psychiatry are first, that the patient has a \"mental disorder\" that warrants treatment; and second, that the patient needs to be treated in the interests of his or her safety or for the protection of others.\r\n\r\nMen in White Coats: Treatment under Coercion is an accessible and timely resource on medical treatment under coercion and its justifications. Split into thirteen chapters, George Szmukler examines the current grounds for involuntary treatment of patients with mental disorders. He argues that the existing laws are both discriminatory and morally unacceptable, and that they should be replaced by an entirely different approach for over-riding treatment refusals.\r\n\r\nUsing case studies and real-life experiences, Men in White Coats: Treatment under Coercion discusses how involuntary treatment in psychiatric practice affects patients, their families, and society, and looks to potential solutions to the current legal frameworks surrounding coercion that could be made applicable across all medical specialties and settings.
Cover Men in White Coats Copyright Contents Introduction Involuntary treatment Justifying compulsion Questioning the orthodoxy Discrimination A solution Treatment pressures and ‘coercion’ A few explanations The title of this book How the book is structured Part I The problem 1 A practice with a very long history Reasons for detention: ‘plus ça change’ The routine, accepted criteria: ‘mental disorder’ and ‘risk of harm’ Do two centuries of no change mean no change is required? A better explanation for the lack of change The ‘shadow of coercion’ References 2 Some troubling observations about involuntary treatment Disturbing statistics on variation by place and time An unfortunate history of abuse, misuse, or mistreatment Psychiatry as an instrument to control threats to the social order Mistreatment due to misplaced therapeutic confidence Race, ethnicity, minority status, and involuntary treatment References 3 The conventional grounds for involuntary treatment are highly problematic Human rights conventions and mental disorder What is a ‘mental disorder’? ‘Disorder’ and ‘values’ Risk: the grave limitations of its assessment What goes into creating a sound risk assessment? The lure of narrative versus statistical reality How the statistics of risk assessment unfold Predicting perpetrators of a homicide Some ‘costs’ of an unwarranted risk emphasis References 4 Challenges to the orthodoxy ‘Informed consent’ and ‘capacity’ A brief history of informed consent Disclosure Decision-making ‘capacity’ or ‘competence’ A codification of case law Decision-making capacity and psychiatry Extending involuntary treatment into the community References 5 How mental health law discriminates against persons with mental illness Two entirely different sets of rules governing involuntary treatment Capacity and best interests How does mental health legislation discriminate? A fundamental failure to respect autonomy The protection of others criterion: an unconcern for fairness Some facts about violence and mental illness The anomalous position of mental illness References Part II A solution 6 A law that does not discriminate against people with mental illness A single, generic law: the ‘fusion’ proposal Key provisions of the ‘fusion’ proposal The principles Scope of the law and definitions of ‘capacity’ and ‘best interests’ Involuntary treatment Offenders with an impairment of mental functioning ‘Deprivation of liberty’: ‘a gilded cage is still a cage’ Deprivation of liberty and the Fusion Law Summary of the proposal References 7 On being able to make decisions and making decisions for others An expanded notion of ‘decision-making capability’ Beyond a ‘cognitive’ or ‘procedural’ view Decision-making capability and the role of ‘interpretation’ ‘Principle of Charity’ Interpretation in practice ‘Understandability’ Values can change Rethinking ‘best interests’ in the light of interpretation Problematic situations Relevance to coercive interventions References 8 A new United Nations ‘disability’ convention: ‘respect for rights, will and preferences’ A ‘paradigm shift’ What the Convention says An ‘authoritative’ interpretation of a key issue How can the challenge be met? ‘Respect for rights, will and preferences’ ‘Interpretation’ and ‘will and preferences’ Discrimination—direct and indirect The Convention and the criminal justice system Supported decision-making Decision-making capability is not an all-or-none phenomenon The Convention and the Fusion Law proposal References Part III ‘Coercion’ viewed more broadly 9 Treatment pressures and ‘coercion’ A spectrum of ‘treatment pressures’ 1 Persuasion 2 Interpersonal leverage 3 Inducements (or offers) 4 Threats 5 Compulsion ‘Subjective’ versus ‘objective’ accounts of coercion Exploitation and ‘unwelcome predictions’ ‘Inducements’ in the context of health care ‘Threats’ in the context of health care Conditional treatment in the community Conditional treatment in hospital Justifying treatment pressures and coercion References 10 Can we reduce the need for coercive interventions? Having a ‘voice’ and ‘procedural justice’ ‘Advance statements’ and ‘psychiatric advance directives’ Crisis cards Joint crisis plans Psychiatric advance directives Reducing coercive measures on hospital wards References Part IV How practice would change 11 ‘Mental disorder’ and public protection Protection, preventive detention, and treatment Preventive detention for infectious disease and discrimination Protection from dangerous people with a ‘mental disorder’ How the Fusion Law would deal with such cases ‘Fitness to plead’ and ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’ ‘Mad’ versus ‘bad’ ‘Psychopathy’ under the Fusion Law proposal Involuntary treatment and addictions References 12 Emergencies, general medicine, ‘community treatment orders’, and ‘psychiatric advance statements’ Emergencies General hospitals ‘Fluctuating capacity’ Involuntary outpatient treatment (or community treatment orders) Advance statements and directives Why have advance statements been ignored in mental illness? Benefits and drawbacks When, if ever, should an advance directive be overridden? References PART V The future 13 Where does this take us? Change is now essential Conflicting social policies, but some positive signs References Index