Marx’s Theory of Value in Chapter 1 of Capital: A Critique of Heinrich’s Value-Form Interpretation (Marx, Engels, and Marxisms)

Titles Published
Titles Forthcoming
Preface
Acknowledgments
Conventions
Praise for Marx’s Theory of Value in Chapter 1 of Capital
Contents
About the Author
1 Marx’s Theory of the Commodity in Chapter 1 of Capital
	1.1 Section 1: The Substance and the Magnitude of the Value of the Commodity
	1.2 Section 2: The Dual Character of Labor in a Commodity Economy: Abstract Human Labor and Concrete Useful Labor
	1.3 Section 3: The Form of Appearance (or Expression) of Value as Exchange-Value
		Content of the Relative Form of Value
		Quantitative Determination of the Relative Form of Value
		The Equivalent Form
		The Simple Form of Value as a Whole
		Expanded Form of Value
		The General Form of Value
		The Money Form of Value
		Abstract Theory of Price
	1.4 Section 4: The Origin of the Fetishism of Commodities
	1.5 Conclusion
	Appendix 1: Proof of the Labor Theory of Value?
	Appendix 2: Simple and Complex Labor
	References
2 Critique of Heinrich’s Value-Form Interpretation of Chapter 1 of Capital
	2.1 Section 1: Analysis of “Exchange Relation”
		Magnitude of Value
		Heinrich’s Second Comment on Section 1: Supply and Demand
	2.2 Section 2: The Dual Character of Labor that Produces Commodities
	2.3 Section 3: Analysis of “Value Relation”
		Content of the Relative Form of Value
		The Quantitative Determination of the Relative Form of Value
		The Equivalent Form
		The Simple Form of Value Considered as a Whole
		Expanded Form of Value
		General Form of Value
	2.4 Section 4: The Fetishism of Commodities
		Seventh Paragraph
	2.5 Conclusion
	References
3 Ergänzungen Und Veränderungen (Additions and Changes): The Value-Form Arises from the Value-Concept
	References
4 General Conclusions
	References
References
Index