Law, Security And The State Of Perpetual Emergency

Foreword......Page 6
 Preface......Page 10
 Praise for Law, Security and the State of Perpetual Emergency......Page 12
 Contents......Page 16
 Notes on Contributors......Page 18
1 Introduction......Page 22
Introduction......Page 32
Schmitt’s Sovereign......Page 39
The Exception and Constituent Power......Page 43
American Liberalism and the Indefinite Exception......Page 48
Democracy, Resistance, and the Multitude: Rehabilitating the Sovereign......Page 50
References......Page 54
Introduction......Page 58
Methodology......Page 60
On Meta-Sovereign Governance......Page 62
Beyond Inside/Outside......Page 66
Drone Warfare as Radical Biopolitics......Page 68
On Space: De-Tellurization of War......Page 71
On Time: Permanence of Exceptional Conditions......Page 73
On Ethics: The Personification and Moralization of Sovereignty......Page 74
Conclusion......Page 78
References......Page 81
Introduction......Page 87
Sovereign and Belligerent Rights......Page 90
International Law in “Cyberspace”......Page 91
International Law and Cyber Operations......Page 92
Espionage and International Law......Page 93
The Legality or Not of Intrusive Cyber Espionage......Page 95
Territorial Sovereignty......Page 97
Espionage and the Legality of the Accessory Act......Page 98
Espionage as Legal (a Carveout)......Page 100
Non-Sovereigntists: Sovereignty-as-a(Non-binding)-Principle......Page 101
Conceptualising a New Normal?......Page 105
Exceptions Are Everywhere?......Page 106
Sovereignty Is Nowhere (and Everywhere)?......Page 107
The Political Ontology of “Cyberspace”......Page 111
Final Words......Page 112
References......Page 120
Introduction......Page 126
From the Exception as De-politicization to the Politics of Exceptionalism......Page 128
The Spatio/Temporal Conditions of War......Page 130
Enabling the Exception in the Parliamentary Debates: Echoes of the War on Terror......Page 136
Making the Exception permanent—1992-?......Page 143
Conclusion......Page 145
References......Page 146
Introduction......Page 152
Rehabilitation in International Human Rights Law......Page 153
The “Rehabilitative Ideal” in the United States......Page 156
US Counterterrorism Law and Its Impact on Rehabilitation......Page 160
Conclusion......Page 168
References......Page 171
Introduction: The Eternal Apprehension of Terrorism......Page 174
The Marketing of Colonialism and Antiterrorism......Page 177
The Logic of Antiterrorism in Post-colonial States......Page 178
Perpetual Emergency and Colonization......Page 181
Executive Supremacy......Page 185
Legal Exceptionalism......Page 187
Reimagining Punishment......Page 188
Economic Coercion......Page 190
Intelligence and Surveillance......Page 192
Profiling......Page 193
Militarism in Law and Governance......Page 195
Conclusion......Page 197
References......Page 201
Introduction......Page 204
Extended Police Powers......Page 205
Contributing to Grievances of Society......Page 209
Threats to Effectiveness......Page 212
Oversized Discretion......Page 213
Judicial Oversight......Page 215
Politics and Policing......Page 216
Toward a Militaristic Approach to Policing......Page 218
Toward a Prevention-Based Model......Page 219
Conclusion......Page 221
References......Page 222
Introduction......Page 225
The Use of Specialized Courts and Procedures Under International Law......Page 226
Ensuring the Right to a Fair Trial in Specialized Courts......Page 227
Arbitrary and Discriminatory Anti-terror Courts Increase Risk of Terrorism......Page 229
De Jure Operations: The Court’s Mandate and Purpose Defined......Page 230
Lack of Judicial and Prosecutorial Independence......Page 235
De Facto Operations: Broad Laws and Lack of Independence or Due Process Guarantees in the Real World......Page 236
Too Many, Too Quickly......Page 237
Targeting Government Critics and Human Rights Advocates......Page 239
Stifling Dissent While Furthering Divides......Page 242
References......Page 246
Introduction......Page 252
Terrorism and Regime Types......Page 253
Case Studies......Page 257
Legal Responses......Page 258
Political Responses......Page 260
Legal Responses......Page 262
Political Responses......Page 264
Turkey (2016)......Page 266
Legal Responses......Page 267
Political Responses......Page 268
Russia (1999)......Page 270
Legal Responses......Page 271
Political Responses......Page 272
Conclusion......Page 274
References......Page 276
Index......Page 283