[Journal] Special Issues of the European Review of Social Psychology, Vol 13

Book Cover......Page 1
Half-Title......Page 2
Title......Page 5
Copyright......Page 6
Contents......Page 7
Contributors......Page 8
Acknowledgements......Page 10
Preface......Page 11
“Me and us” or “us and them”? The self as a heuristicfor defining minimal ingroups......Page 13
POSITIVE INGROUP DEFAULT......Page 18
SELF AND POSITIVE INGROUP EVALUATION......Page 22
Self and ingroup in connectionist networks......Page 23
The case of judgemental ambiguity......Page 24
Self-categorisation as an ingroup member......Page 26
The self as an anchor for ingroup judgements......Page 27
Self-anchoring in ingroup judgements as a functionof information processing......Page 32
IMPLICATIONS AND LIMITATIONS......Page 33
Ingroup versus outgroup evaluation: Autonomoussources of positive ingroup distinctiveness......Page 34
Implications regarding social identity theory’sexplanation for the “mere categorisation effect”......Page 35
Self-anchoring and the content of group evaluation......Page 37
Minimal versus real group settings......Page 38
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION......Page 39
REFERENCES......Page 40
A dual-route model of crossed categorisation effects......Page 47
MULTIPLE CATEGORY USE IN SOCIALPERCEPTION......Page 48
MODELS OF CROSSED INTERGROUP AFFILIATION......Page 52
THE ADDITIVE PATTERN......Page 55
Category differentiation......Page 56
A DUAL-ROUTE MODEL OF CROSSEDCATEGORISATION EFFECTS......Page 57
Affective state and category importance......Page 63
Access to individuating information......Page 68
Contextual inclusiveness......Page 69
REFINEMENTS TO THE MODEL......Page 72
Affect and importance interaction......Page 73
Process specificity......Page 75
Specific emotion......Page 78
CONCLUSIONS......Page 79
REFERENCES......Page 80
Stereotype accuracy......Page 87
DETERMINING THE ACTUAL CHARACTERISTICSOF A GROUP: THE ACCURACY CRITERION......Page 90
Summary......Page 93
Signed perceived-actual discrepancies......Page 94
Within-subject sensitivity correlations......Page 97
Relationships among signed discrepancies,absolute discrepancies, and within-subjectsensitivity correlations......Page 99
Moderators of intergroup differences in stereotypes......Page 102
Stereotype change and development......Page 108
Individual differences in stereotype accuracy......Page 111
Consequences of stereotype use......Page 113
CONCLUSION......Page 116
REFERENCES......Page 117
The psychology of system justification and thepalliative function of ideology......Page 122
Social identity theory......Page 125
Cognitive dissonance theory......Page 127
Social dominance theory......Page 128
HYPOTHESES DERIVED FROM SYSTEMJUSTIFICATION THEORY......Page 129
Rationalisation of the status quo......Page 130
Internalisation of inequality......Page 131
Relations among ego, group, and systemjustification motives......Page 133
The reduction of ideological dissonance......Page 134
Rationalisation of the status quo......Page 135
Internalisation of inequality......Page 142
Depressed entitlement......Page 148
Ingroup ambivalence......Page 151
Self-esteem, depression, and neuroticism......Page 153
The reduction of ideological dissonance......Page 154
THE PALLIATIVE FUNCTION OF SYSTEMJUSTIFYING IDEOLOGY......Page 156
The power of meritocratic ideology......Page 157
A coping perspective on the psychology ofsystem justification......Page 158
CONCLUDING REMARKS......Page 159
REFERENCES......Page 160
Leader endorsement in social dilemmas: Comparingthe instrumental and relational perspectives......Page 166
LEADERSHIP AS A SOLUTION TOSOCIAL DILEMMAS......Page 169
Instrumental perspective on leadership insocial dilemmas......Page 170
A relational perspective on leadership insocial dilemmas......Page 171
A differential needs model of leadership......Page 172
The moderating role of identity......Page 173
Prediction......Page 174
RESEARCH PARADIGM AND PROCEDURE......Page 175
Preference for a group leader......Page 176
What kind of leader?......Page 177
THE INFLUENCE OF LEADERSHIP ON COOPERATION......Page 179
Power base of group leader......Page 180
Leadership style......Page 183
Personal attributes of leader......Page 185
CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION......Page 188
REFERENCES......Page 192
Gender-related inequalities in the division of familywork in close relationships: A social psychologicalperspective......Page 197
INTRODUCTION......Page 198
Previous theoretical explanations......Page 199
A social psychological perspective......Page 201
Determinants of perceived (in)justice......Page 202
The distributive justice framework......Page 204
Empirical tests of the distributive justice framework......Page 206
Summary......Page 211
Marital conflict over the division of labour......Page 212
The division of labour: An asymmetricalconflict issue......Page 214
Gender-role ideology......Page 218
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS......Page 219
Gender-related inequality and perceptionsof (in)justice......Page 220
Consequences of gender-related discontent andperceived injustice......Page 221
Limitations......Page 222
REFERENCES......Page 223
Does scientific thinking lead to success and sanity? Anintegration of attribution and attributional models......Page 231
Antecedents of causal attributions......Page 232
Consequences of causal attributions......Page 233
Shortcomings of attributional models ofmotivation, emotion, and action......Page 237
The veridicality of a causal attribution......Page 240
The functionality of reactions......Page 242
Differences between the integrative attributionalmodel and classical attributional models......Page 243
Evidence for the functionality of realisticattributions......Page 245
Empirical tests of the integrative model......Page 247
Studies regarding the veridicality of depressives’attributions......Page 252
Self-perceived covariation information ofdepressive and non-depressive individuals andtheir relation to causal attributions......Page 255
NON-ATTRIBUTIONAL COGNITIVEDETERMINANTS OF DEPRESSION......Page 263
CONCLUSIONS......Page 267
REFERENCES......Page 270
Morality and political orientations: An analysis oftheir relationship......Page 274
MORALITY AND POLITICAL IDEOLOGY......Page 275
Cognitive constructivism and political orientation......Page 278
Equality of access to social order andprincipled reasoning......Page 281
Moral reasoning communicates a political position......Page 282
COGNITIVE SOPHISTICATION AND THE RULES OFTHE POLITICAL GAME......Page 290
POLITICAL IDENTITY: ALSO A MATTER OFMORE OR LESS......Page 294
CONCLUSIONS......Page 300
REFERENCES......Page 301
Testing attitude—behaviour theories usingnon-experimental data: An examination of somehidden assumptions......Page 308
THE TRA AND THE TPB AS CAUSAL MODELS......Page 309
TIMELINE ANALYSIS OF THEATTITUDE-INTENTION RELATIONSHIP......Page 312
Standardised versus unstandardised coefficients......Page 320
ALLOWING MULTIPLE CAUSES OF INTENTION......Page 321
1. Mauro’s method......Page 329
2. Instrumental variables......Page 331
3. Clogg and Haritou’s method......Page 332
4. Abandon causal inferences......Page 333
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS......Page 334
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS......Page 335
REFERENCES......Page 336
Author index......Page 339
Subject index......Page 351