دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
دسته بندی: هندسه و توپولوژی ویرایش: نویسندگان: Borceaux F. سری: ناشر: سال نشر: تعداد صفحات: 410 زبان: English فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود) حجم فایل: 6 مگابایت
کلمات کلیدی مربوط به کتاب سه گانه هندسی I. رویکردی بدیهی به هندسه: ریاضیات، هندسه عالی
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Geometric Trilogy I. An Axiomatic Approach to Geometry به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب سه گانه هندسی I. رویکردی بدیهی به هندسه نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
Издательство Springer, 2014, -410 pp.
Geometric Trilogy I. An Axiomatic Approach to Geometry
(/file/1440126/).
Geometric Trilogy II. An Algebraic Approach to Geometry
(/file/1440128/).
Geometric Trilogy III. An Axiomatic Approach to Geometry
(/file/1440130/).
The reader is invited to immerse himself in a love story which
has been unfolding for 35 centuries: the love story between
mathematicians and geometry. In addition to accompanying the
reader up to the present state of the art, the purpose of this
Trilogy is precisely to tell this story. The Geometric Trilogy
will introduce the reader to the multiple complementary aspects
of geometry, first paying tribute to the historical work on
which it is based and then switching to a more contemporary
treatment, making full use of modern logic, algebra and
analysis. In this Trilogy, Geometry is definitely viewed as an
autonomous discipline, never as a sub-product of algebra or
analysis. The three volumes of the Trilogy have been written as
three independent but complementary books, focusing
respectively on the axiomatic, algebraic and differential
approaches to geometry. They contain all the useful material
for a wide range of possibly very different undergraduate
geometry courses, depending on the choices made by the
professor. They also provide the necessary geometrical
background for researchers in other disciplines who need to
master the geometric techniques.
The present book leads the reader on a walk through 35
centuries of geometry: from the papyrus of the Egyptian scribe
Ahmes, 16 centuries before Christ, to Hilbert’s famous
axiomatization of geometry, 19 centuries after Christ. We
discover step by step how all the ingredients of contemporary
geometry have slowly acquired their final form.
It is a matter of fact: for three millennia, geometry has
essentially been studied via synthetic methods, that is, from a
given system of axioms. It was only during the 17th century
that algebraic and differential methods were considered
seriously, even though they had always been present, in a
disguised form, since antiquity. After rapidly reviewing some
results that had been known empirically by the Egyptians and
the Babylonians, we show how Greek geometers of antiquity,
slowly, sometimes encountering great difficulties, arrived at a
coherent and powerful deductive theory allowing the rigorous
proof of all of these empirical results, and many others.
Famous problems—such as squaring the circle—induced the
development of sophisticated methods. In particular, during the
fourth century BC, Eudoxus overcame the puzzling difficulty of
incommensurable quantities by a method which is essentially
that of Dedekind cuts for handling real numbers. Eudoxus also
proved the validity of a limit process (the Exhaustion theorem)
which allowed him to answer questions concerning, among other
things, the lengths, areas or volumes related to various curves
or surfaces.
We first summarize the knowledge of the Greek geometers of the
time by presenting the main aspects of Euclid’s Elements. We
then switch to further work by Archimedes (the circle, the
sphere, the spiral, .), Apollonius (the conics), Menelaus and
Ptolemy (the birth of trigonometry), Pappus (ancestor of
projective geometry), and so on.
We also review some relevant results of classical Euclidean
geometry which were only studied several centuries after
Euclid, such as additional properties of triangles and conics,
Ceva’s theorem, the trisectors of a triangle, stereographic
projection, and so on. However, the most important new aspect
in this spirit is probably the theory of inversions (a special
case of a conformal mapping) developed by Poncelet during the
19th century.
We proceed with the study of projective methods in geometry.
These appeared in the 17th century and had their origins in the
efforts of some painters to understand the rules of
perspective. In a good perspective representation, parallel
lines seem to meet at the horizon. From this comes the idea of
adding points at infinity to the Euclidean plane, points where
parallel line eventually meet. For a while, projective methods
were considered simply as a convenient way to handle some
Euclidean problems. The recognition of projective geometry as a
respectable geometric theory in itself—a geometry where two
lines in the plane always intersect—only came later. After
having discussed the fundamental ideas which led to projective
geometry—we focus on the amazing Hilbert theorems. These
theorems show that the very simple classical axiomatic
presentation of the projective plane forces the existence of an
underlying field of coordinates. The interested reader will
find in [5], Vol. II of this Trilogy, a systematic study of the
projective spaces over a field, in arbitrary dimension, fully
using the contemporary techniques of linear algebra.
Another strikingly different approach to geometry imposed
itself during the 19th century: non-Euclidean geometry.
Euclid’s axiomatization of the plane refers— first—to four
highly natural postulates that nobody thought to contest. But
it also contains the famous—but more involved—fifth postulate,
forcing the uniqueness of the parallel to a given line through
a given point. Over the centuries many mathematicians made
considerable efforts to prove Euclid’s parallel postulate from
the other axioms. One way of trying to obtain such a proof was
by a reductio ad absurdum: assume that there are several
parallels to a given line through a given point, then infer as
many consequences as possible from this assumption, up to the
moment when you reach a contradiction. But very unexpectedly,
rather than leading to a contradiction, these efforts instead
led step by step to an amazing new geometric theory. When
actual models of this theory were constructed, no doubt was
left: mathematically, this non-Euclidean geometry was as
coherent as Euclidean geometry. We recall first some attempts
at proving Euclid’s fifth postulate, and then develop the main
characteristics of the non-Euclidean plane: the limit parallels
and some properties of triangles. Next we describe in full
detail two famous models of non-Euclidean geometry: the
Beltrami–Klein disc and the Poincaré disc. Another model—the
famous Poincaré half plane—will be given full attention in [6],
Vol. III of this Trilogy, using the techniques of Riemannian
geometry.
We conclude this overview of synthetic geometry with Hilbert’s
famous axiomatization of the plane. Hilbert has first filled in
the small gaps existing in Euclid’s axiomatization:
essentially, the questions related to the relative positions of
points and lines (on the left, on the right, between, .),
aspects that Greek geometers considered as being intuitive or
evident from the picture. A consequence of Hilbert’s
axiomatization of the Euclidean plane is the isomorphism
between that plane and the Euclidean plane R2: this forms the
link with [5], Vol. II of this Trilogy. But above all, Hilbert
observes that just replacing the axiom on the uniqueness of the
parallel by the requirement that there exist several parallels
to a given line through a same point, one obtains an
axiomatization of the non-Euclidean plane, as studied in the
preceding chapter.
To conclude, we recall that there are various well-known
problems, introduced early in antiquity by the Greek geometers,
and which they could not solve. The most famous examples are:
squaring a circle, trisecting an angle, duplicating a cube,
constructing a regular polygon with n sides. It was only during
the 19th century, with new developments in algebra, that these
ruler and compass constructions were proved to be impossible.
We give explicit proofs of these impossibility results, via
field theory and the theory of polynomials. In particular we
prove the transcendence of π and also the Gauss-Wantzel
theorem, characterizing those regular polygons which are
constructible with ruler and compass. Since the methods
involved are completely outside the synthetic approach to
geometry, to which this book is dedicated, we present these
various algebraic proofs in several appendices.
Each chapter ends with a section of problems and another
section of exercises. Problems generally cover statements which
are not treated in the book, but which nevertheless are of
theoretical interest, while the exercises are designed for the
reader to practice the techniques and further study the notions
contained in the main text.
Pre-Hellenic Antiquity.
Some Pioneers of Greek Geometry.
Euclid’s Elements.
Some Masters of Greek Geometry.
Post-Hellenic Euclidean Geometry.
Projective Geometry.
Non-Euclidean Geometry.
Hilbert’s Axiomatization of the Plane.
A. Constructibility.
B. The Three Classical Problems.
C. Regular Polygons.