ورود به حساب

نام کاربری گذرواژه

گذرواژه را فراموش کردید؟ کلیک کنید

حساب کاربری ندارید؟ ساخت حساب

ساخت حساب کاربری

نام نام کاربری ایمیل شماره موبایل گذرواژه

برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید


09117307688
09117179751

در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید

دسترسی نامحدود

برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند

ضمانت بازگشت وجه

درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب

پشتیبانی

از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب

دانلود کتاب Der Vorchristliche Jesus

دانلود کتاب عیسی قبل از مسیحی

Der Vorchristliche Jesus

مشخصات کتاب

Der Vorchristliche Jesus

دسته بندی: دین
ویرایش:  
نویسندگان:   
سری:  
 
ناشر: Alfred Töpelmann 
سال نشر: 1906 
تعداد صفحات: 272 
زبان: German 
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود) 
حجم فایل: 8 مگابایت 

قیمت کتاب (تومان) : 36,000

در صورت ایرانی بودن نویسنده امکان دانلود وجود ندارد و مبلغ عودت داده خواهد شد



ثبت امتیاز به این کتاب

میانگین امتیاز به این کتاب :
       تعداد امتیاز دهندگان : 16


در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Der Vorchristliche Jesus به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.

توجه داشته باشید کتاب عیسی قبل از مسیحی نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.


توضیحاتی در مورد کتاب عیسی قبل از مسیحی

404 - File or directory not found.

The resource you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.


توضیحاتی درمورد کتاب به خارجی

Der vorchristliche Jesus: nebst weiteren Vorstudien zur Entstehungsgeschichte des Urchristentums This scarce antiquarian book is a facsimile reprint of the original. Due to its age, it may contain imperfections such as marks, notations, marginalia and flawed pages. The first edition of this work was published in German in 1905, and since then the authors thesis has received widespread attention all over the Christian world. That an American mathematician writing from Tulane University, where Smith is a professor, should defend a thesis in opposition to a whole army of higher critics and receive such wide- spread, and, on the whole, serious attention from a score or more of them, speaks well for American scholarship in this field. The kernel of the five essays in the book can perhaps be presented as follows: The original doctrine concerning Jesus, a divinity who emanci­ pates, protects, and heals, was the belief and teaching of a prechristian cult which, between the years 100 B.C. and a.d. 100, more or less enveloped in secrecy and “mysteries,” was widespread among the Jews and espe­ cially among the Greeks. This doctrine was the original source of Chris­ tianity, which arose, consequently, from many centers, and not, as a later tradition maintains, from the single center of Jerusalem. Jesus was called “ the Nazarene,” not from the city of Nazareth (which did not ex­ ist at that time), but from the Hebrew meaning of the root of the word, "the keeper” or "guard.” His anastasis meant originally the installa­ tion as "Messiah,” “ World-Ruler,” “Judge of the living and the dead,” and so forth; and this was later, by the addition of the supplementary phrase "from the dead,” changed into the resurrection. The "two great ideas,” the one, imposing, preached by John the Baptist and others, of " One who shall come," and the other, milder and more genial. “of Jesus,” were originally different, but were finally united in the world- conquering concept of Jesus Christ. The idea of the seed-sower had to do originally with God’s sowing the seeds of the Logos which produced the world, a picture of the origin of the world possessed by prechristian Naasenes (erroneously considered by some to be merely a sect of the Christian gnostics). No one knew of Paul's letter to the Romans until the year 160 A.D. Smith writes, “ The Jesus-cult is an historical fact, and indeed the most important historical fact there is for us. In the gospels the Jesus* concept is dominant, and in the other writings of the New Testament the Christ-idea is subordinate to it. . . . Orthodoxy or conservatism says that Jesus was god-man, echter Gott und zugleich echier Mensch” For science, however, this notion remains an unthinkable Unding. To ex­ plain Jesus there are for science but two possible hypotheses. Either Jesus is a deified man, or he is a humanized god. Like the undulatory theory of light, the first hypothesis is now a very highly developed con­ cept. On it, especially in Germany, three generations of scholars, among them men of genius, have labored with unfaltering zeal. With what re­ sult? One must confess, with a negative result. In short, the attempt to explain the appearance of the Jesus-cult, the new gospel, and the chris- tian propaganda by any conceivable idea of u purely human Jesus, has, in the light of historical criticism, in no respect and in no degree, suc­ ceeded. The complete failure of this noble, century-long effort becomes daily more and more obvious. ... If it were possible to explain the facta in accordance with this hypothesis, German science would long since have done it. ... I challenge the higher critics to mention a single crucial fact of original Christianity which is satisfactorily ex­ plained by their theory. . . . The problem can never be solved in this way. . . , Hence we must assume that Jesus is a humanised god, and carefully test whether on the basis of this assumption a view free from contradictions, in which all is in order, can be developed. This is the only scientific method. In it alone can we hope for a final solution of this most important and most interesting of all historical problems" And Smith goes on to maintain that Christianity will lose nothing and gain in every way by such a solution. In the preface of the first edition, Sohmoidel announces himself as an opponent of Smith’s vicxvs, but vouches for the author7* scholarly abil­ ities and thorough methods, saying it will be difficult to refute Smith's conclusions. Soon after its publication, however, in a work entitled “ 1st das 4 liberal© ’ Jcsusbild Wicderlegt t ** Weinel spends much ink in say­ ing, with very little grace, that Smith does not know what he is talking about. In Drcws'a “ Christui-mythe H Schmeidel is criticized for writing the preface to such a book; and Johannes Weiss, in 44 Jesus von Naaareth Mythu* oder Geschichte,” writes that Schmeidel 14 might have done better than, by writing o preface, supply this book with a foil.” Schmcidcl, in a article, nleads that he only wished to call the attention t •



فهرست مطالب

INHALTSVERZEICBNIS 
VORWORT  von  PAUL  Wilhelm Schniedel  VII-XI 
VORREDE   XIII-XVIII  
I.  DER  VORCHRISTLICHE  JESUS  1 
II. DIE BEDEUTUNG  DES BEINAMENS  "NAZORAUS"    42 
III ANASTASIS   71 
IV. DER SAEMANN  SAT DEN  LOGOS    108 
V.  SAECULI  SILENTIUM  137
 ANMERKUNGEN    225 
A.  Zu  8. 22, 165.  ILANI-SIBIT   225 
B.  s.  51.  Wellhausen ober GENNESAR  226 
c.  s.  65.  ZUR QUELLENKRITIK DES EPIPHANIOS   226 
D.  s.  78.  'EK  NEKPON  228 
E.  S. 120.  'EN  TO  EPEIPEIN AYTON   232 
F.  S. 123.  Reitzensteins  "POIMANDRES"  235 

STELLENVERZEICHNIS    236 
AUTORENVERZEICHNIS    242




نظرات کاربران