دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش: نویسندگان: Paul Beaumont, Mihail Danov, Katarina Trimmings, Burcu Yüksel (editors) سری: Studies in Private International Law ISBN (شابک) : 9781782256762, 9781782256786 ناشر: Hart Publishing سال نشر: 2017 تعداد صفحات: [865] زبان: English فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود) حجم فایل: 167 Mb
در صورت ایرانی بودن نویسنده امکان دانلود وجود ندارد و مبلغ عودت داده خواهد شد
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Cross-Border Litigation in Europe به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب دعاوی برون مرزی در اروپا نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
این کتاب اساسی و اصلی به بررسی چگونگی عملکرد چارچوب حقوق بینالملل خصوصی اتحادیه اروپا (PIL) میپردازد و تأثیر آن را بر اجرای عدالت در پروندههای فرامرزی در اتحادیه اروپا بررسی میکند. این از یک پروژه بزرگ (یعنی EUPILLAR: حقوق بینالملل خصوصی اتحادیه اروپا: کاربرد حقوقی در واقعیت) که توسط برنامه عدالت مدنی اتحادیه اروپا حمایت مالی میشود، شکل گرفت. این تحقیق توسط مرکز حقوق بینالملل خصوصی در دانشگاه آبردین رهبری شد و شرکای آن از دانشگاههای فرایبورگ، آنتورپ، وروسلاو، لیدز، میلان و مادرید (Complutense) در آن شرکت داشتند. مشارکت کنندگان با انجام یک تحلیل جامع از دیوان دادگستری اتحادیه اروپا (CJEU) و رویه قضایی ملی در مورد بروکسل I، رم I و II، بروکسل IIa و مقررات نگهداری، به ویژگی های خاص اختلافات فرامرزی در اتحادیه اروپا می پردازند. بخش اول توسعه چارچوب اتحادیه اروپا PIL را مورد بحث قرار می دهد. بخش دوم شامل گزارش های ملی از 26 کشور عضو اتحادیه اروپا است. بخش III (مدنی و تجاری) و IV (حقوق خانواده) شامل تجزیه و تحلیل رویه قضایی CJEU و چندین فصل مقطعی است. بخش پنجم به طور خلاصه دستور کار اصلاحات نهادی را تعیین می کند که برای بهبود اثربخشی رژیم اتحادیه اروپا PIL ضروری است. این کتاب پروژه تحقیقاتی جامع مورد توجه محققان، دانشجویان، شاغلین حقوقی، قضات و سیاست گذارانی است که در زمینه حقوق بین الملل خصوصی کار می کنند یا علاقه مند هستند.
This substantial and original book examines how the EU Private International Law (PIL) framework is functioning and considers its impact on the administration of justice in cross-border cases within the EU. It grew out of a major project (ie EUPILLAR: European Union Private International Law: Legal Application in Reality) financially supported by the EU Civil Justice Programme. The research was led by the Centre for Private International Law at the University of Aberdeen and involved partners from the Universities of Freiburg, Antwerp, Wroclaw, Leeds, Milan and Madrid (Complutense). The contributors address the specific features of cross-border disputes in the EU by undertaking a comprehensive analysis of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) and national case law on the Brussels I, Rome I and II, Brussels IIa and Maintenance Regulations. Part I discusses the development of the EU PIL framework. Part II contains the national reports from 26 EU Member States. Parts III (civil and commercial) and IV (family law) contain the CJEU case law analysis and several cross-cutting chapters. Part V briefly sets the agenda for an institutional reform which is necessary to improve the effectiveness of the EU PIL regime. This comprehensive research project book will be of interest to researchers, students, legal practitioners, judges and policy-makers who work, or are interested, in the field of private international law.
Series Editor's Preface Editors' Preface Table of Contents Contributors List 1 Introduction: Research Aims and Methodology I. Legislative Developments and Theoretical Framework II. Other Relevant Studies and Project Research Aims III. Assessing the Effectiveness of EU PIL: Legislative Objectives and Issues in a Cross-border Context IV. Research Methodology V. Value Added by the Project VI. Structure of the Book Part I Shaping the Development of the Private International Law Framework 2 EU Competence to Legislate in the Area of Private International Law and Law Reforms at the EU Level I. EU Competence to Legislate in the Area of Private International Law II. Legal Sources of EU Private International Law III. Territorial Scope of EU Legislation on Private International Law IV. Law Reforms at EU Level 3 An Analysis of the Effectiveness of the EU Institutions in Making and Interpreting EU Private International Law Regulations I. Introduction II. Effectiveness of the EU Legislature in making EU Private International Law Regulations III. Effectiveness of the Court of Justice of the EU in Interpreting EU Private International Law Regulations IV. Conclusion 4 Unharmonised Procedural Rules: Is there a Case for Further Harmonisation at EU Level? I. Introduction II. To What Extent has the EU already Harmonised National Procedural Rules? III. Is There a Compelling Political or Legal Case for Further Harmonisation of Procedural Rules by the EU? IV. What Then Should be Harmonised? V. How Should this Harmonisation be Effected? VI. Conclusion Part II Cross-border Litigation Pattern—Empirical Data and Analysis 5 Great Britain I. Introduction II. England and Wales III. Scotland IV. Conclusion 6 Belgium I. Introduction II. Civil and Commercial Matters III. Family Law Matters IV. Conclusion 7 Germany I. Introduction II. Germany's Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Germany's Experience in Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 8 Italy I. Introduction II. Italy's Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Italian Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 9 Spain I. Introduction II. Spain's Experience in Non-family Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Spain's Experience in Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 10 Poland I. Introduction II. Poland's Experience in Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Poland's Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes 11 Austria I. Introduction II. Austria's Experience in Cross-border Non-family Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Austria's Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes 12 Bulgaria I. Introduction II. Brussels I III. Applicable Law-Rome I and Rome II IV. Cross-border Family Law Disputes V. Conclusion 13 Croatia I. Introduction II. Issues Under the Brussels I Regulation III. Croatian National Courts' Practice in Interpreting the Regulations IV. Cost and Length of Litigation in Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes V. Settlement and Alternative Dispute Resolution for Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes VI. Conclusion 14 Cyprus I. Introduction II. Cyprus's Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Cyprus's Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 15 Czech Republic I. Introduction II. Czech Experience in Non-family Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Czech Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 16 Finland I. Introduction II. Finland's Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Finland's Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 17 France I. Introduction II. France's Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. French Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes 18 Greece I. Introduction II. Greece's Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Greece's Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 19 Hungary I. Introduction II. Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 20 Ireland I. Introduction II. Ireland's Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Ireland's Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 21 Latvia I. Introduction II. Latvia's Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Latvia's Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 22 Lithuania I. Introduction II. Lithuania's Experience on Cross-border Civil Disputes and Civil Procedure Governing the Commercial Disputes III. Lithuania's Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 23 Luxembourg I. Introduction II. Luxembourg's Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Luxembourg's Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 24 Malta I. Introduction II. Malta's Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Malta's Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 25 The Netherlands I. Introduction II. The Netherlands Experience in Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. The Netherlands' Experience in Cross-border Family Law Disputes 26 Portugal I. Introduction II. Portugal's Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Portugal's Experience of Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 27 Romania I. Introduction II. Romania's Experience in Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Romania's Experience in Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 28 Slovakia I. Introduction II. Slovak Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Slovak Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes 29 Slovenia I. Introduction II. Slovenia's Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Slovenia's Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 30 Sweden I. Introduction II. Sweden's Experience on Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes III. Sweden's Experience on Cross-border Family Law Disputes IV. Conclusion 31 Promoting Efficient Litigation? I. Introduction II. Welfare Analysis of Litigation III. Analysis of the Litigation Pattern IV. Conclusion 32 Data Analysis: Important Issues to be Considered in a Cross-border Context I. Introduction II. Remedies Impact Parties' Decisions Whether/Where to Sue III. The EU Legal Landscape Shapes the Litigants' Strategies IV. The Litigants' Strategies Affect the Available Remedies: Some Issues to be Considered V. Conclusion Part III Litigating Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes—A Europe of Law and Justice 33 Cross-border Civil and Commercial Disputes Before the Court of Justice of the European Union I. Introduction II. Interpretation of the Rules on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters under the Brussels I Regulation III. Interpretation of the Rules on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations Under the Rome I Regulation IV. Interpretation of the Rules on the Law Applicable to Non-contractual Obligations under the Rome II Regulation V. Conclusion 34 Legal Certainty and Predictability in the EUPILLAR Project's Regulations: An Assessment I. Introduction II. Right to Justice and the Concepts of Legal Certainty and Predictability in the EU Legal Framework III. Legal Certainty in EUPILLAR's Project Regulations IV. Interpretation, Characterisation and Consistency V. Particular Issues VI. Conclusions 35 Effective Remedies in Cross-border Civil and Commercial Law Disputes: A Case for an Institutional Reform at EU Level I. Introduction II. Parties' Strategies: EU Legal Landscape-A Level of Legal Uncertainty-Effective Remedies III. The Level of Legal Uncertainty and Remedies: Cost-shifting-Litigants' Behaviour and Settlements in Cross-border Cases IV. Concluding Remarks 36 Cross-border Contract Litigation in the EU I. Introduction II. Conflicts Rules in Commercial Contracts III. Contracts with Inequality of Bargaining Power IV. Conclusion 37 Cross-border Non-contractual Disputes: The Legislative Framework and Court Practice I. Introduction II. International Jurisdiction III. Applicable Law IV. Overall Conclusion 38 Litigating Cross-border Intellectual Property Disputes in the EU Private International Law Framework I. Introduction II. Jurisdiction III. Applicable Law IV. Conclusion 39 Private Enforcement of Competition Law I. Introduction II. European Union Private International Law: Reducing Uncertainties by Reform and by Judicial Clarification of the Existing Law III. Conclusion 40 The Relationship Between Litigation and ADR: Evaluating the Effect of the EU PIL Framework on ADR/Settlements in Cross-border Cases I. Introduction and Some Preliminary Remarks: ADR/Settlements and Cross-border Litigation II. A Level of Harmonisation-The EU Legislative Framework III. The Relationship Between Litigation and ADR in Cross-border Cases IV. Assessing the Effect of the EU PIL Framework on ADR and Settlements V. Conclusion Part IV Litigating Cross-border Family Law Disputes—A Europe of Law and Justice 41 Court of Justice of the European Union's Case Law on Family Law Matters Under Brussels IIa and Maintenance I. Introduction II. Brussels IIa Regulation III. Maintenance Regulation IV. Conclusion 42 Habitual Residence: The Factors that Courts Consider I. Introduction II. The Autonomous Interpretation of a Factual Concept III. Habitual Residence of Adults IV. Habitual Residence of Legal Persons V. Habitual Residence of Children VI. Conclusion 43 No Deal Better than a Bad Deal-Child Abduction and the Brussels IIa Regulation I. Introduction II. The Hague Abduction Convention Mechanism III. Brussels IIa Regulation IV. Conclusions and Proposals 44 New (and Old) Problems for Maintenance Creditors Under the EU Maintenance Regulation I. Introduction II. Jurisdiction III. Lis Pendens IV. Recognition and Enforcement V. Conclusion 45 Mediation in EU Cross-border Family Law I. Introduction II. Mediation: Expression of Autonomy III. Mediating Decisions Affecting Children Under Directive 2008/52 IV. Conclusions 46 Matrimonial Matters under the Brussels IIa Regulation I. Article 1: Material Scope II. Article 3: Jurisdictional Grounds III. Articles 6 and 7: Residual Grounds of Jurisdiction IV. The Bigger Picture: Fragmentation of Jurisdiction V. Article 19-Lis Pendens and Dependent Actions in Matrimonial Matters VI. Declining Jurisdiction in Favour of a Third Country: Implications of Owusu v Jackson VII. Concluding Remarks: Time for Reform? Part V Conclusion 47 Cross-border Litigation in Europe: Some Theoretical Issues and Some Practical Challenges I. Factors Impairing Parties' Access to Effective Remedies: A Case for Reform II. Some Specific Aspects in Relation to Cross-border Family Law Disputes III. Case for Reform: Institutional Architecture and Remedies in Cross-border Cases IV. Revising the EU Legal Landscape and the BREXIT Implications: Could There be Even More Adjudicatory Competition? Index