دسترسی نامحدود
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
برای ارتباط با ما می توانید از طریق شماره موبایل زیر از طریق تماس و پیامک با ما در ارتباط باشید
در صورت عدم پاسخ گویی از طریق پیامک با پشتیبان در ارتباط باشید
برای کاربرانی که ثبت نام کرده اند
درصورت عدم همخوانی توضیحات با کتاب
از ساعت 7 صبح تا 10 شب
ویرایش:
نویسندگان: Jonathan H. Adler
سری: Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism
ISBN (شابک) : 3031211073, 9783031211072
ناشر: Palgrave Macmillan
سال نشر: 2023
تعداد صفحات: 379
[380]
زبان: English
فرمت فایل : PDF (درصورت درخواست کاربر به PDF، EPUB یا AZW3 تبدیل می شود)
حجم فایل: 5 Mb
در صورت تبدیل فایل کتاب Climate Liberalism: Perspectives on Liberty, Property and Pollution به فرمت های PDF، EPUB، AZW3، MOBI و یا DJVU می توانید به پشتیبان اطلاع دهید تا فایل مورد نظر را تبدیل نمایند.
توجه داشته باشید کتاب لیبرالیسم آب و هوا: دیدگاههایی درباره آزادی، مالکیت و آلودگی نسخه زبان اصلی می باشد و کتاب ترجمه شده به فارسی نمی باشد. وبسایت اینترنشنال لایبرری ارائه دهنده کتاب های زبان اصلی می باشد و هیچ گونه کتاب ترجمه شده یا نوشته شده به فارسی را ارائه نمی دهد.
لیبرالیسم آب و هوا پتانسیل و محدودیت های رویکردهای کلاسیک-لیبرالی برای کنترل آلودگی و تغییرات آب و هوا را بررسی می کند. برخی از استراتژیهای زیستمحیطی موفق، مانند استفاده از سهم صید برای شیلات، حقوق آب داخل رودخانه، و مجوزهای انتشار قابل تجارت، به شدت بر سنت فکری لیبرال کلاسیک و تأکید آن بر حقوق مالکیت و بازارهای رقابتی استوار است. این سنت فکری تا به امروز کمتر در توسعه یا طراحی سیاستهای تغییر اقلیم مفید بوده است. لیبرالیسم اقلیمی با هدف کمک به پر کردن شکاف در ادبیات آکادمیک بررسی میکند که اصول کلاسیک-لیبرال، از جمله تأکید بر حقوق مالکیت، اقتدار غیرمتمرکز و بازارهای پویا، میتوانند بحث در مورد سیاستهای تغییر آب و هوا را روشن کنند. مشارکت کنندگان در این کتاب از منظرهای مختلفی به موضوع نگاه می کنند و چندین رشته دانشگاهی را نمایندگی می کنند. فصلها نقش حقوق مالکیت و سیستمهای حقوقی عرفی را در کنترل آلودگی، میزانی که بازارهای رقابتی با حمایت قوانین قانونی تشویق به حداقلسازی ریسک و سازگاری میکنند، و چگونگی شناسایی انواع مداخلات سیاستی که ممکن است به روشهایی به مقابله با تغییرات آب و هوایی کمک کند، در نظر میگیرند. که با ارزش های لیبرالی سازگار است.
Climate Liberalism examines the potential and limitations of classical-liberal approaches to pollution control and climate change. Some successful environmental strategies, such as the use of catch-shares for fisheries, instream water rights, and tradable emission permits, draw heavily upon the classical liberal intellectual tradition and its emphasis on property rights and competitive markets. This intellectual tradition has been less helpful, to date, in the development or design of climate change policies. Climate Liberalism aims to help fill the gap in the academic literature examining the extent to which classical-liberal principles, including an emphasis on property rights, decentralized authority and dynamic markets, can inform the debate over climate-change policies. The contributors in this book approach the topic from a range of perspectives and represent multiple academic disciplines. Chapters consider the role of property rights and common-law legal systems in controlling pollution, the extent to which competitive markets backed by legal rules encourage risk minimization and adaptation, and how to identify the sorts of policy interventions that may help address climate change in ways that are consistent with liberal values.
Acknowledgments Contents Notes on Contributors List of Figures List of Tables Introduction Conventional Environmental Protection Classical-Liberal Environmental Protection The Problem of Pollution The Climate Challenge Climate Liberalism Conclusion Notes Pollution and Natural Rights Introduction Natural Rights Theory Pollution and Natural Rights The Efficiency Objection The Liberty Objection Conventionality The Efficiency Objection, Redux Conclusion Notes Do Libertarians Have Anything Useful to Contribute to Climate Change Policy? Introduction The Varieties of Libertarian Environmental and Climate Policies Libertarian Dissensus Libertarian Climate Policies Pure Property-Based Environmental and Climate Policies Property-Based Plus Limited Government Action Special Problems of Climate Change for Free Market Environmentalism Problems for Common-Law Property-Based Solutions Problems for “Market-Based” Regulatory Instruments Implications and Conclusion Notes Climate Change Adaptation Through the Prism of Individual Rights Introduction Property Owners’ Takings Claims Based on Adaptation Regulation Takings Doctrine in Brief Inequality, Causation, and Property Owners’ Takings Claims Governments Suing Energy Companies for Adaptation Costs in Public Nuisance The Notice/Causation Nexus Conclusion Notes Common Law Tort as a Transitional Regulatory Regime: A New Perspective on Climate Change Litigation Introduction Tort Law in the Administrative State: A Dynamic, Information-Forcing, Experimentation Model of Common Law Tort as a Transitional Regulatory Regime Climate Change Litigation: Laying a Foundation for Experimentation with Adaptation Measures Conclusion: Common Law Tort as Part of the Future of Environmental Law? Notes Libertarianism, Pollution, and the Limits of Court Adjudication Enforcing Rights Navigating Indeterminacy Limited Protections Path Dependency Uncertainty Predictably Limited Protection Institutional Competencies Recasting the Judiciary Focusing on Rights Conclusion Notes Complexities of Climate Governance in Multidimensional Property Regimes Introduction Climate Change Indicators Weather Modification Wildfire Siloed Approaches in Interconnected Systems Unregulated Polluters Pollution’s Connection to Land A Theory of Landscape-Level Governance Stakeholder Collaborations Negative-Value Resources Wildfire, A Case Study Restoring Fire to the Natural Landscape Conclusion Notes Climate Change and Class Actions What Is a Class Action? The Classical Liberal Case for Class Actions Better Incentives More Independence Notes Nature and the Firm The Firm The Firm and the Environment Where Are the Environmental Firms? The Airshed authority—A Thought Experiment Firms and Federalism Conclusion Notes Permission, Prohibition, and Dynamism Economic Dynamism Political Dynamism and the Open Society Dynamism as a Social Value Prohibitions and Permissions Permissions, Innovation, and the Environment Conclusion Notes Market Solutions to Large Number Environmental Problem-Induced Changes in Risk Distributions Introduction Challenges Presented by Changes in Risk Distributions The Role of Alternative Risk Transfer Mechanisms The Traditional Insurance Baseline The Role of Alternative Risk Transfer Captive Insurance Catastrophe Bonds Weather Derivatives Using ART Methods Harnessing ARTMs to Incentivize Adaptation The Entrepreneur’s Role Policy Options Notes A Classical Liberal Case for Target-Consistent Carbon Pricing Property Rights and Their Limits1 The Role of Government Friedrich Hayek’s Contributions11 Pricing, Science, and the Future16 The Case for Target-Consistent Pricing Conclusions Notes Climate Change, Political Economy, and the Problem of Comparative Institutions Analysis Introduction Comparative Institutions Analysis in Political Economy Climate Change Governance and Comparative Institutions Analysis Institutional Options for Climate Change Governance The Problem of Comparative Evaluation Modelling to the Rescue? History to the Rescue? Like Cases to the Rescue? Conclusion Notes The Social Cost of Carbon, Humility, and Overlapping Consensus on Climate Policy Introduction and Overview The Social Cost of Carbon The Social Cost of a Pollutant: The Basic Idea The Social Cost of Carbon (SCC), and Estimates of the SCC The SCC-Based Approach to Climate Policy A Modest Carbon Tax Derived from SCC Estimates as an Alternative to a Pigouvian Tax Overlapping Consensus, Ecumenical Climate Policy, and the SCC-Based Approach Ecumenical Climate Policy: How the SCC-Based Approach is Neutral Between Different Reasonable Normative Frameworks Overlapping Consensus on Climate Policy: How the SCC-Based Approach Can Help Identify a Policy That Is Justifiable to All Summary of Distinctions Relevant to Evaluating the SCC-Based Approach and Policy Recommendations Additional Worries About the SCC-Based Approach Worry: Too Much Mitigation, Because of Overly Pessimistic Assumptions About Technology and Adaptation Worry: Too Much Mitigation, Given Political Infeasibility and Counterproductive Blowback of Recommended Mitigation Worry: Too Much Mitigation, Because Domestic SCC Is Only a Fraction of Global SCC Worry: Too Little Mitigation, Because Worst-Case Scenarios Are Ignored and/or There Is Too Much Pure Time Preference (i.e., Impacts More Than a Century from Now Are Given Little Importance) Worry: Too Little Mitigation, Because Many Harms Are Not Accounted for, Especially Harm to the Poor, Oppressed, and Most Vulnerable Worry: Carbon Taxation Is the Wrong Mechanism for Emissions Reductions Notes Index