Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation

Front Matter....Pages i-2
Reasons....Pages 3-15
The Pragmatic Dimension of Premise Acceptability....Pages 17-26
Rationality and Judgment....Pages 27-40
The Dialectical Tier Revisited....Pages 41-53
The Rabbit in the Hat....Pages 55-68
Toulmin’s Warrants....Pages 69-82
Metadialogues....Pages 83-90
Relationships Among Logic, Dialectic and Rhetoric....Pages 91-107
Logical Fallacies, Dialectical Transgressions, Rhetorical Sins, and Other Failures of Rationality in Argumentation....Pages 109-122
A Pragmatic View of the Burden of Proof....Pages 123-132
The Ordinary Practice of Presuming and Presumption with Special Attention to Veracity and the Burden of Proof....Pages 133-146
Two Conceptions of Openness in Argumentation Theory....Pages 147-155
Multidimensionality and Non-Deductiveness in Deliberative Argumentation....Pages 157-171
Argumentation Studies in France....Pages 173-187
Discourse Correspondence Between Argumentative and Grammatical Sequences....Pages 189-193
Diagramming, Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions....Pages 195-211
Legal Argumentation Theory and the Concept of Law....Pages 213-226
Arguers’ Obligations: Another Perspective....Pages 227-236
Charles S. Peirce’s Theory of Abduction and the Aristotelian Enthymeme From Signs....Pages 237-254
Rhetoric and Dialectic in Martin Luther King’s ‘Letter From Birmingham Jail’....Pages 255-268
On the Argumentative Quality of Explanatory Narratives....Pages 269-282
The Wiles of Argument....Pages 283-295
Felicity Conditions For The Circumstantial ad Hominem ....Pages 297-308
The Potential Conflict Between Normatively-Good Argumentative Practice and Persuasive Success....Pages 309-318
The Concept of Argument Quality in the Elaboration Likelihood Model....Pages 319-335
How Narrative Argumentation Works....Pages 337-346
Back Matter....Pages 347-347