Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2012: OECD Countries (AGRICULTURE ET ALIMENTATION, ENVIRONNEME)

Foreword
Acknowledgements
Table of Contents
List of acronyms and abbreviations
Executive summary
Part I. Agricultural policies: Monitoring and evaluation 2012 OECD countries
	Chapter 1. Evaluation of developments in agricultural policy and support
		1.1. Key economic and market developments
			Figure 1.1. Commodity prices index, 2006 to 2012
		1.2. Main changes in agricultural policies
			Box 1.1. OECD Contributions to the G20 Agenda on Food and Agriculture
			OECD countries are set to introduce new agricultural policy frameworks affected by fiscal tightening
				Box 1.2. European Commission proposals for the Common Agricultural Policy post-2013
			Policies are only gradually re-focussing on innovation and productivity
			Managing the interaction between agriculture and the environment remains a challenge…
			... in particular, an efficient response to climate change
			Some events overwhelmed ex ante disaster programmes…
			… market instruments for risk management continue to develop, driven by public support…
			… while risks related to plant, animal and human health triggered policy action and new regulations
			Programmes aiming to support farm income represent a significant share of support, but there has been little development in this area
			However, production and trade distorting policies remain…
			… while concerns about the competitive structure of agro-food markets persist…
			... and some policy responses unfolded
			Doha negotiations are in an impasse while Russia is set to become a member of WTO…
				Box 1.3. Russia’s WTO accession and commitments in agriculture
			... while the WTO dispute settlement mechanisms remain active...
			… and more countries are pursuing broader regional and bilateral free trade agreements
		1.3. Developments in agricultural support
			Producer support in the OECD area fell slightly in 2011 and reached an historical low
				Figure 1.2. Evolution of OECD support indicators, 1986-2011
			In most OECD countries support declined only modestly or remained unchanged in 2011
				Figure 1.3. Producer Support Estimates by country, 2010 and 2011
				Box 1.4. What drove changes in the monetary value of support in 2011?
					Figure 1.4. Contribution of various factors to the change in the Producer Support Estimate in 2011
			In the long run, support is declining in all countries but differences in levels remain large
				Figure 1.5. Producer Support Estimate by country, 1995-97 and 2009-11
			Countries differ significantly in the ways they provide support
				Figure 1.6. Composition of Producer Support Estimate by country, 2009-11
			Most countries moved towards less distortive support by reducing agricultural protection…
				Figure 1.7. Producer Nominal Protection Coefficient (NPC) by country, 1995-97 and 2009-11
			… increasing the use of payments that are more decoupled from current production…
				Figure 1.8. Use and composition of support based on area, animal numbers, receipts and income by country, 1995-97 and 2009-11
			… and providing less support tied to specific commodities
				Figure 1.9. OECD: Single Commodity Transfers, 1995-97 and 2009-11
			However, reduced policy distortions in recent years are mostly due to high world prices
			Support to general services for the sector continues to gain in importance
				Figure 1.10. Composition of General Services Support Estimate by country, 2009-11
			Consumers of agricultural commodities have benefited from the reductions in price support...
				Figure 1.11. Consumer Support Estimate by country, 1995-97 and 2009-11
			… while support relative to national income falls
				Figure 1.12. Total Support Estimate by country, 1995-97 and 2009-11
			The trajectories of support in the emerging economies differ from those in OECD countries
				Box 1.5. Agricultural support trends in emerging economies
					Figure 1.13. Emerging Economies: Producer Support Estimate by country, 1995-97 and 2008-10
					Figure 1.14. Emerging Economies: Total Support Estimate by country, 1995-97 and 2008-10
		1.4. Assessment of reforms
			Less and better support…
				Figure 1.15. Changes in level and composition of producer support, per country
			... implies supporting farm incomes with fewer production distortions…
				Figure 1.16. Changes in degree of decoupling and income impact, 1986-2010
			... and provides an opportunity to address current policy priorities
		Notes
		References
		Annex 1.A1. Measuring the impact of policy reform: PEM-based policy impact indicators
			Figure 1.A1.1. Production-impact ad valorem index by country, 1986-2010
			Figure 1.A1.2. Estimated impacts of change in least distorting support on production and income, 1986-2010
		Annex 1.A2. Definition of OECD indicators of agricultural support
			Box 1.A2.1. Definitions of categories in the PSE classification
	Chapter 2. Fostering innovation and productivity growth in agriculture
		2.1. Agricultural productivity and sustainability: Trends and differences
			Productivity measure: Trends and diversity
				Table 2.1. Developments in global and regional Total Factor Productivity
				Table 2.2. Developments in Total Factor Productivity in OECD countries and emerging economies
				Figure 2.1. Annual growth rates in world crop yields (%)
			Trends in resource use and availability
				Table 2.3. OECD Agriculture’s use of natural resources, farm inputs and contribution to water and air emissions of importance to the environmental performance of agriculture, 2007-09
		2.2. Some factors determining agricultural productivity
			The need for innovation
			Policies and regulations
			Farm structural characteristics
			Market conditions
			Natural environment
			Resource availability
		2.3. Improving Agricultural Innovation Systems
			The case for an Agricultural Innovation Systems approach
				Table 2.4. Defining features in relation with the agricultural innovation systems
			Overview of agricultural education, R&D and extension systems
				Box 2.1. Common approaches to financing innovation
				Table 2.5. Advisory services in OECD countries
			General trends in Agricultural Innovation Systems institutions
			Trends in R&D and extension funding
				Figure 2.2. Government expenditures on agricultural R&D
				Figure 2.3. Government expenditures on extension services
				Figure 2.4. Share of government expenditures on extension services
			Fostering national Agricultural Innovation Systems
				Box 2.2. Models for pull mechanisms
			Key issues for improving Agricultural Innovation Systems
		2.4. The policy challenge
			Trends in agricultural policies
				Figure 2.5. Payments with constraints on production practices
			Agricultural policies fostering productivity growth sustainably
		2.5. Strengthening policy coherence
		Notes
		References
		Annex 2.A1. Background material
			Table 2.A1.1. Developments in world crop yields, 1961-2010
			Table 2.A1.2. Differences in yields across regions, 2008-10
			Table 2.A1.3. Developments in wheat yields in OECD countries and emerging economies, 1961-2010
			Table 2.A1.4. Developments in maize yields in OECD countries and emerging economies, 1961-2010
			Table 2.A1.5. Developments in rice yields in OECD countries and emerging economies, 1961-2010
Part II. Country chapters
	Chapter 3. Developments in agricultural support in the OECD area
		The level and composition of agricultural support in the OECD area
			Figure 3.1. OECD: Composition of Producer Support Estimate, 1986-2011
			Table 3.1. OECD: estimates of support to agriculture
			Table 3.2. OECD: Estimates of support to agriculture
			Box 3.1. Use of PSE in evaluating annual changes in agricultural supportfor the OECD area as a whole
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
	Chapter 4. Australia
		Evaluation of policy developments
		Figure 4.1. Australia: PSE level and composition by support categories, 1986-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 4.1. Australia: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 4.2. Australia: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 4.3. Australia: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 4.2. Australia: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of policy developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy developments in 2011-2012
			Trade Policy developments in 2011-2012
	Chapter 5. Canada
		Box 5.1. Evaluation of policy developments
		Figure 5.1. Canada: PSE level and composition by support categories, 1986-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 5.1. Canada: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 5.2. Canada: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 5.3. Canada: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 5.2. Canada: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of policy developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy developments in 2011-2012
			Trade Policy developments in 2011-2012
	Chapter 6. Chile
		Box 6.1. Evaluation of policy developments
		Figure 6.1. Chile: PSE level and composition by support categories, 1995-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 6.1. Chile: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 6.2. Chile: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 6.3. Chile: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			Producer prices are almost aligned with world prices, reflecting almost no distortions in output markets.
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 6.2. Chile: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of policy developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy developments in 2011-12
			Trade Policy developments in 2011-2012
	Chapter 7. European Union
		Box 7.1. Evaluation of Policy Developments
		Figure 7.1. European Union: PSE level and composition by support categories, 1986-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 7.1. European Union: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 7.2. European Union: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 7.3. European Union: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 7.2. European Union: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of policy developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy developments in 2011-12
			Trade policy developments in 2011-12
		Notes
	Chapter 8. Iceland
		Box 8.1. Evaluation of Policy Developments
		Figure 8.1. Iceland: PSE level and composition by support categories, 1986-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 8.1. Iceland: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 8.2. Iceland: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 8.3. Iceland: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 8.2. Iceland: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of Policy Developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy developments in 2011-12
			Trade policy developments in 2011-12
		Notes
	Chapter 9. Israel
		Box 9.1. Evaluation of policy developments
		Figure 9.1. Israel: PSE level and composition by support categories, 1995-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 9.1. Israel: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 9.2. Israel: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 9.3. Israel: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 9.2. Israel: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of policy developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy developments in 2011-12
			Trade policy developments in 2011-12
	Chapter 10. Japan
		Box 10.1. Evaluation of policy developments
		Figure 10.1. Japan: PSE level and composition by support categories, 1986-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 10.1. Japan: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 10.2. Japan: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 10.3. Japan: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 10.2. Japan: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of policy developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy developments in 2011-12
				Box 10.1. Japan’s Regional Economic Integration and Agricultural Policy Reform
				Box 10.2. Restoration from the Great East Japan Earthquake in agriculture
			Trade policy developments in 2011-12
	Chapter 11. Korea
		Box 11.1. Evaluation of policy developments
		Figure 11.1. Korea: PSE level and composition by support categories, 1986-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 11.1. Korea: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 11.2. Korea: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 11.3. Korea: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 11.2. Korea: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of policy developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy developments in 2011-12
			Trade policy developments in 2011-12
	Chapter 12. Mexico
		Box 12.1. Evaluation of policy developments
		Figure 12.1. Mexico: PSE level and composition by support categories, 1991-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 12.1. Mexico: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 12.2. Mexico: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 12.3. Mexico: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 12.2. Mexico: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of policy developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy developments in 2011-12
			Trade policy developments in 2011-12
	Chapter 13. New Zealand
		Box 13.1. Evaluation of policy developments
		Figure 13.1. New Zealand: PSE level and composition by support categories, 1986-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 13.1. New Zealand: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 13.2. New Zealand: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 13.3. New Zealand: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 13.2. New Zealand: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of policy developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy developments in 2011-12
			Trade policy developments in 2011-12
	Chapter 14. Norway
		Box 14.1. Evaluation of policy developments
		Figure 14.1. Norway: PSE level and composition by support categories, 1986-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 14.1. Norway: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 14.2. Norway: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 14.3. Norway: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 14.2. Norway: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of policy developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy developments in 2011-12
			Trade policy developments in 2011-12
	Chapter 15. Switzerland
		Box 15.1. Evaluation of policy developments
		Figure 15.1. Switzerland: PSE level and composition by support categories, 1986-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 15.1. Switzerland: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 15.2. Switzerland: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 15.3. Switzerland: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 15.2. Switzerland: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of policy developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy developments in 2011-12
			Trade policy developments in 2011-12
	Chapter 16. Turkey
		Box 16.1. Evaluation of policy developments
		Figure 16.1. Turkey: PSE level and composition by support categories, 1986-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 16.1. Turkey: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 16.2. Turkey: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 16.3. Turkey: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 16.2. Turkey: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of policy developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy developments in 2011-12
			Trade policy developments in 2011-12
	Chapter 17. United States
		Box 17.1. Evaluation of policy developments
		Figure 17.1. United States: PSE level and composition by support categories, 986-2011
		Contextual information
			Table 17.1. United States: Contextual indicators, 1995, 2010
			Figure 17.2. United States: Main macroeconomic indicators, 1995-2011
			Figure 17.3. United States: Agro-food trade, 1995-2010
		Development of support to agriculture
			PSE as % of receipts (%PSE)
			Potentially most distorting support as % of PSE
			Ratio of producer price to border price (NPC)
			TSE as % of GDP
			Decomposition of change in PSE, 2010 to 2011
			Transfer to specific commodities (SCT), 2009-11
			Table 17.2. United States: Estimates of support to agriculture
		Description of policy developments
			Main policy instruments
			Domestic policy
			Trade policy
		Sources and definitions of contextual indicators
			Table III.1. OECD: Producer Support Estimate by country
			Table III.2. OECD: Consumer Support Estimate by country
			Table III.3. OECD: General Services Support Estimate by country
			Table III.4. OECD: Total Support Estimate by country
			Table III.5. OECD: Composition of Producer Support Estimate by country
			Table III.6. OECD: Characteristics of policy support by country
			Table III.7. OECD: Composition of General Services Support Estimate
			Table III.8. OECD: Producer Single Commodity Transfers (USD)
			Table III.9. OECD: Producer Single Commodity Transfers (EUR)
			Table III.10. Australia: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.11. Canada: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.12. Chile: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.13. European Union: Producer Single Commodity Transfers (EU27)
			Table III.14. Iceland: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.15. Israel: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.16. Japan: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.17. Korea: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.18. Mexico: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.19. New Zealand: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.20. Norway: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.21. Switzerland: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.22. Turkey: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.23. United States: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.24. OECD: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers (USD)
			Table III.25. OECD: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers (EUR)
			Table III.26. Australia: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.27. Canada: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.28. Chile: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.29. European Union: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers (EU27)
			Table III.30. Iceland: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.31. Israel: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.32. Japan: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.33. Korea: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.34. Mexico: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.35. New Zealand: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.36. Norway: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.37. Switzerland: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.38. Turkey: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.39. United States: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
			Table III.40. Australia: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
			Table III.41. Canada: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
			Table III.42. Chile: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
			Table III.43. European Union: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income (EU27)
			Table III.44. Iceland: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
			Table III.46. Japan: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
			Table III.45. Israel: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
			Table III.47. Korea: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
			Table III.48. Mexico: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
			Table III.49. New Zealand: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
			Table III.50. Norway: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
			Table III.51. Switzerland: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
			Table III.52. Turkey: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
			Table III.53. United States: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
			Table III.54. Contribution to change in Producer Support Estimate by country, 2010 to 2011
			Table III.55. Contribution of Market Price Support to change in Producer Support Estimate by country, 2010 to 2011
			Table III.56. Contribution to change in Border Price by country, 2010 to 2011
Part III. Summary tables of estimates of support for OECD countries
	Table III.1. OECD: Producer Support Estimate by country
	Table III.2. OECD: Consumer Support Estimate by country
	Table III.3. OECD: General Services Support Estimate by country
	Table III.4. OECD: Total Support Estimate by country
	Table III.5. OECD: Composition of Producer Support Estimate by country
	Table III.6. OECD: Characteristics of policy support by country
	Table III.7. OECD: Composition of General Services Support Estimate
	Table III.8. OECD: Producer Single Commodity Transfers (USD)
	Table III.9. OECD: Producer Single Commodity Transfers (EUR)
	Table III.10. Australia: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.11. Canada: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.12. Chile: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.13. European Union: Producer Single Commodity Transfers (EU27)
	Table III.14. Iceland: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.15. Israel: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.16. Japan: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.17. Korea: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.18. Mexico: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.19. New Zealand: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.20. Norway: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.21. Switzerland: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.22. Turkey: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.23. United States: Producer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.24. OECD: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers (USD)
	Table III.25. OECD: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers (EUR)
	Table III.26. Australia: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.27. Canada: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.28. Chile: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.29. European Union: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers (EU27)
	Table III.30. Iceland: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.31. Israel: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.32. Japan: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.33. Korea: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.34. Mexico: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.35. New Zealand: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.36. Norway: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.37. Switzerland: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.38. Turkey: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.39. United States: Consumer Single Commodity Transfers
	Table III.40. Australia: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
	Table III.41. Canada: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
	Table III.42. Chile: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
	Table III.43. European Union: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income (EU27)
	Table III.44. Iceland: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
	Table III.45. Israel: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
	Table III.46. Japan: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
	Table III.47. Korea: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
	Table III.48. Mexico: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
	Table III.49. New Zealand: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
	Table III.50. Norway: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
	Table III.51. Switzerland: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
	Table III.52. Turkey: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
	Table III.53. United States: Payments made on the basis of area, animal numbers, receipts or income
	Table III.54. Contribution to change in Producer Support Estimate by country, 2010 to 2011
	Table III.55. Contribution of Market Price Support to change in Producer Support Estimate by country, 2010 to 2011